哥伦比亚和厄瓜多尔的传统知识政策合作生产

IF 1 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1080/25729861.2023.2188107
Martha Isabel Gómez Lee, André-Noël Roth Deubel
{"title":"哥伦比亚和厄瓜多尔的传统知识政策合作生产","authors":"Martha Isabel Gómez Lee, André-Noël Roth Deubel","doi":"10.1080/25729861.2023.2188107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper opens the black box of policy co-production processes presented by the Colombian and Ecuadorian governments, regarding the traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, in keeping with the necessities of Indigenous peoples. The purpose of this paper is to analyze what similarities and differences there exist in the role of the Ecuadorian and Colombian States as organizers, guarantors of plural expression, and facilitators of public deliberation, and how policymakers have opened the space for Indigenous peoples for producing traditional knowledge policy. The paper turns to qualitative research focused on collecting information from public actors. The data obtained assesses our working hypothesis that the role of the State in the production of traditional knowledge policy has been more democratic in Ecuador than in Colombia.","PeriodicalId":36898,"journal":{"name":"Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society","volume":"170 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traditional knowledge policy co-production in Colombia and Ecuador\",\"authors\":\"Martha Isabel Gómez Lee, André-Noël Roth Deubel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25729861.2023.2188107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper opens the black box of policy co-production processes presented by the Colombian and Ecuadorian governments, regarding the traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, in keeping with the necessities of Indigenous peoples. The purpose of this paper is to analyze what similarities and differences there exist in the role of the Ecuadorian and Colombian States as organizers, guarantors of plural expression, and facilitators of public deliberation, and how policymakers have opened the space for Indigenous peoples for producing traditional knowledge policy. The paper turns to qualitative research focused on collecting information from public actors. The data obtained assesses our working hypothesis that the role of the State in the production of traditional knowledge policy has been more democratic in Ecuador than in Colombia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society\",\"volume\":\"170 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2023.2188107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2023.2188107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文打开了哥伦比亚和厄瓜多尔政府提出的关于与遗传资源相关的传统知识的政策共同生产过程的黑箱,以符合土著人民的需要。本文的目的是分析厄瓜多尔和哥伦比亚两国作为组织者、多元表达保障者和公共审议促进者的角色有何异同,以及政策制定者如何为土著人民制定传统知识政策打开空间。本文转向定性研究,侧重于从公共行为者收集信息。所获得的数据评估了我们的工作假设,即国家在制定传统知识政策方面的作用在厄瓜多尔比在哥伦比亚更为民主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Traditional knowledge policy co-production in Colombia and Ecuador
This paper opens the black box of policy co-production processes presented by the Colombian and Ecuadorian governments, regarding the traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, in keeping with the necessities of Indigenous peoples. The purpose of this paper is to analyze what similarities and differences there exist in the role of the Ecuadorian and Colombian States as organizers, guarantors of plural expression, and facilitators of public deliberation, and how policymakers have opened the space for Indigenous peoples for producing traditional knowledge policy. The paper turns to qualitative research focused on collecting information from public actors. The data obtained assesses our working hypothesis that the role of the State in the production of traditional knowledge policy has been more democratic in Ecuador than in Colombia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society
Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge mobilization in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) researchers: an approach to the Mexican national health system Changes in the landscape, threats, and the struggle of the quilombola communities from Alto Trombetas for their territories Seminal ideas for old and new problems in Latin America: José Medina Echavarría and his legacy Scalar dissonances, knowledge-making, sense of urgency, and social narratives about the future. Contours of the climate change debate in Latin America A new history of sociology? Southern perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1