{"title":"改善低通量分布式血液学实验室设置与CellaVision®DC-1仪器的周转时间","authors":"Cheri Mayes, Tracey Gwilliam, Etienne R. Mahe","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2023-0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Digital pathology is becoming standard in the delivery of timely, high-quality clinical services, inclusive of morphological assessment in laboratory hematology. While many digital hematology systems are designed with high-throughput in mind, CellaVision ® has recently developed a low-throughput instrument, the CellaVision ® DC-1. The utility of the CellaVision ® DC-1 was tested in a distributed laboratory system, with a focus on turn-around times (TATs). Methods We evaluated the TATs of a CellaVision ® DC-1 workflow, with specimens originating in a small spoke-laboratory referring materials to a central hub-laboratory. Our spoke-laboratories perform on-site complete blood counts (CBC’s) and manual peripheral blood smears (PBS’s), with complex cases referred for review to the hub-laboratory. Baseline TATs were collected, followed by prospective evaluation of 21 cases analyzed using the CellaVision ® DC-1, with digital review by spoke-laboratory staff in concert with remote review by hub-laboratory staff. The TATs for the same 21 cases by standard manual assessment were compared. Results Improvement in the distribution of TATs using the CellaVision ® DC-1 was noted relative to the retrospective spoke-laboratory data (Mann–Whitney U=26, p<0.0001) and the parallel manual PBS review (Wilcoxon W=190, p<0.0001). The CellaVision ® DC-1 permitted a significant reduction in case-assessment times (Wilcoxon W=105, p=0.0001). No significant diagnostic discrepancies were identified during the testing timeframe. Conclusions We describe a real-world assessment of the CellaVision ® DC-1 analyzer in a distributed (hub-and-spoke) laboratory network, linking low-volume laboratories to high-throughput sites. Our evaluation highlights significant improvements in case TATs with a CellaVision ® DC-1 assisted digital pathology workflow.","PeriodicalId":55986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"88 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving turn-around times in low-throughput distributed hematology laboratory settings with the CellaVision<sup>®</sup> DC-1 instrument\",\"authors\":\"Cheri Mayes, Tracey Gwilliam, Etienne R. Mahe\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/labmed-2023-0073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives Digital pathology is becoming standard in the delivery of timely, high-quality clinical services, inclusive of morphological assessment in laboratory hematology. While many digital hematology systems are designed with high-throughput in mind, CellaVision ® has recently developed a low-throughput instrument, the CellaVision ® DC-1. The utility of the CellaVision ® DC-1 was tested in a distributed laboratory system, with a focus on turn-around times (TATs). Methods We evaluated the TATs of a CellaVision ® DC-1 workflow, with specimens originating in a small spoke-laboratory referring materials to a central hub-laboratory. Our spoke-laboratories perform on-site complete blood counts (CBC’s) and manual peripheral blood smears (PBS’s), with complex cases referred for review to the hub-laboratory. Baseline TATs were collected, followed by prospective evaluation of 21 cases analyzed using the CellaVision ® DC-1, with digital review by spoke-laboratory staff in concert with remote review by hub-laboratory staff. The TATs for the same 21 cases by standard manual assessment were compared. Results Improvement in the distribution of TATs using the CellaVision ® DC-1 was noted relative to the retrospective spoke-laboratory data (Mann–Whitney U=26, p<0.0001) and the parallel manual PBS review (Wilcoxon W=190, p<0.0001). The CellaVision ® DC-1 permitted a significant reduction in case-assessment times (Wilcoxon W=105, p=0.0001). No significant diagnostic discrepancies were identified during the testing timeframe. Conclusions We describe a real-world assessment of the CellaVision ® DC-1 analyzer in a distributed (hub-and-spoke) laboratory network, linking low-volume laboratories to high-throughput sites. Our evaluation highlights significant improvements in case TATs with a CellaVision ® DC-1 assisted digital pathology workflow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"88 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2023-0073\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2023-0073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving turn-around times in low-throughput distributed hematology laboratory settings with the CellaVision® DC-1 instrument
Abstract Objectives Digital pathology is becoming standard in the delivery of timely, high-quality clinical services, inclusive of morphological assessment in laboratory hematology. While many digital hematology systems are designed with high-throughput in mind, CellaVision ® has recently developed a low-throughput instrument, the CellaVision ® DC-1. The utility of the CellaVision ® DC-1 was tested in a distributed laboratory system, with a focus on turn-around times (TATs). Methods We evaluated the TATs of a CellaVision ® DC-1 workflow, with specimens originating in a small spoke-laboratory referring materials to a central hub-laboratory. Our spoke-laboratories perform on-site complete blood counts (CBC’s) and manual peripheral blood smears (PBS’s), with complex cases referred for review to the hub-laboratory. Baseline TATs were collected, followed by prospective evaluation of 21 cases analyzed using the CellaVision ® DC-1, with digital review by spoke-laboratory staff in concert with remote review by hub-laboratory staff. The TATs for the same 21 cases by standard manual assessment were compared. Results Improvement in the distribution of TATs using the CellaVision ® DC-1 was noted relative to the retrospective spoke-laboratory data (Mann–Whitney U=26, p<0.0001) and the parallel manual PBS review (Wilcoxon W=190, p<0.0001). The CellaVision ® DC-1 permitted a significant reduction in case-assessment times (Wilcoxon W=105, p=0.0001). No significant diagnostic discrepancies were identified during the testing timeframe. Conclusions We describe a real-world assessment of the CellaVision ® DC-1 analyzer in a distributed (hub-and-spoke) laboratory network, linking low-volume laboratories to high-throughput sites. Our evaluation highlights significant improvements in case TATs with a CellaVision ® DC-1 assisted digital pathology workflow.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Laboratory Medicine (JLM) is a bi-monthly published journal that reports on the latest developments in laboratory medicine. Particular focus is placed on the diagnostic aspects of the clinical laboratory, although technical, regulatory, and educational topics are equally covered. The Journal specializes in the publication of high-standard, competent and timely review articles on clinical, methodological and pathogenic aspects of modern laboratory diagnostics. These reviews are critically reviewed by expert reviewers and JLM’s Associate Editors who are specialists in the various subdisciplines of laboratory medicine. In addition, JLM publishes original research articles, case reports, point/counterpoint articles and letters to the editor, all of which are peer reviewed by at least two experts in the field.