Manisha Bharadia, Zoë Dworsky-Fried, Mackenzie Moir, Manasi Rajagopal, Serge Gouin, Scott Sawyer, Stephanie Pellerin, Lise Bourrier, Naveen Poonai, Antonia Stang, Michael van Manen, Samina Ali
{"title":"影响父母对肌肉骨骼损伤相关疼痛患儿镇痛决策的75个因素:一项定性研究","authors":"Manisha Bharadia, Zoë Dworsky-Fried, Mackenzie Moir, Manasi Rajagopal, Serge Gouin, Scott Sawyer, Stephanie Pellerin, Lise Bourrier, Naveen Poonai, Antonia Stang, Michael van Manen, Samina Ali","doi":"10.1093/pch/pxad055.075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Parents/caregivers are often the gatekeepers for the pharmacologic management of their children’s pain. Parents’ unique expertise in assessing their children’s pain reactions, alongside a deep emotional drive to protect their children, make them invaluable advocates and partners. Parents are highly invested in optimizing pain management outcomes for children. Concerns and preferences regarding medications, including opioids, influence their choices. An improved understanding of caregiver decision-making should encourage a family-centred approach to communication with parents when deciding analgesic plans for children with acute pain, facilitate shared clinical decision-making, and optimize paediatric pain management outcomes in the clinical setting. Objectives Our primary objective was to explore and understand caregiver decision-making as it relates to acute pain management for children presenting to the emergency department, with particular focus on opioids. Design/Methods This qualitative study was embedded within an ongoing paediatric clinical trial (‘The No OUCH Trials’, NCT03767933), which aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a combination of oral opioid (hydromorphone) and non-opioid (ibuprofen and acetaminophen) analgesics to manage paediatric musculoskeletal injury-related pain. This study employed one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Parents of children with acute musculoskeletal injuries were recruited from three Canadian paediatric emergency departments (Stollery Children’s Hospital [Edmonton, Alta.], CHU Sainte-Justine [Montreal, Qué.], and Winnipeg Children’s Hospital [Winnipeg, Man.]). Interviews were conducted via telephone from June 2019 to March 2021. Verbatim transcription and thematic analyses occurred concurrently with data collection, supporting data saturation and theory development considerations. Results Twenty-seven interviews were completed. Five major themes regarding pain assessment and treatment emerged: a) My child’s comfort is a priority; b) Every situation is unique; c) Opioids only if necessary; d) Considerations when choosing opioids; and e) Pain research is important. Overall, parents were highly comfortable with their assessment of their child’s pain. Participants’ willingness to use opioid analgesia for their children was primarily dependent on perceptions of injury and pain severity. Although considerations for opioid use were similar between opioid-averse and opioid-willing families, the trade-offs between maximizing pain relief and minimizing risks were weighed differently. Conclusion Our study revealed that parents assess their child’s pain and distress as a global entity, with great confidence in their own assessment and decision-making. For most parents, the desire to relieve their children’s pain outweighed concerns of addiction, misuse, and adverse events when making decisions about opioid analgesia for short-term use. These results can inform evidence-based family-centred approaches to co-decision-making of analgesic plans for children with acute pain.","PeriodicalId":19730,"journal":{"name":"Paediatrics & child health","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"75 Factors that Influence Parental Decision-making Regarding Analgesia for their Children with Musculoskeletal Injury-related Pain: A Qualitative Study\",\"authors\":\"Manisha Bharadia, Zoë Dworsky-Fried, Mackenzie Moir, Manasi Rajagopal, Serge Gouin, Scott Sawyer, Stephanie Pellerin, Lise Bourrier, Naveen Poonai, Antonia Stang, Michael van Manen, Samina Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pch/pxad055.075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Parents/caregivers are often the gatekeepers for the pharmacologic management of their children’s pain. Parents’ unique expertise in assessing their children’s pain reactions, alongside a deep emotional drive to protect their children, make them invaluable advocates and partners. Parents are highly invested in optimizing pain management outcomes for children. Concerns and preferences regarding medications, including opioids, influence their choices. An improved understanding of caregiver decision-making should encourage a family-centred approach to communication with parents when deciding analgesic plans for children with acute pain, facilitate shared clinical decision-making, and optimize paediatric pain management outcomes in the clinical setting. Objectives Our primary objective was to explore and understand caregiver decision-making as it relates to acute pain management for children presenting to the emergency department, with particular focus on opioids. Design/Methods This qualitative study was embedded within an ongoing paediatric clinical trial (‘The No OUCH Trials’, NCT03767933), which aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a combination of oral opioid (hydromorphone) and non-opioid (ibuprofen and acetaminophen) analgesics to manage paediatric musculoskeletal injury-related pain. This study employed one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Parents of children with acute musculoskeletal injuries were recruited from three Canadian paediatric emergency departments (Stollery Children’s Hospital [Edmonton, Alta.], CHU Sainte-Justine [Montreal, Qué.], and Winnipeg Children’s Hospital [Winnipeg, Man.]). Interviews were conducted via telephone from June 2019 to March 2021. Verbatim transcription and thematic analyses occurred concurrently with data collection, supporting data saturation and theory development considerations. Results Twenty-seven interviews were completed. Five major themes regarding pain assessment and treatment emerged: a) My child’s comfort is a priority; b) Every situation is unique; c) Opioids only if necessary; d) Considerations when choosing opioids; and e) Pain research is important. Overall, parents were highly comfortable with their assessment of their child’s pain. Participants’ willingness to use opioid analgesia for their children was primarily dependent on perceptions of injury and pain severity. Although considerations for opioid use were similar between opioid-averse and opioid-willing families, the trade-offs between maximizing pain relief and minimizing risks were weighed differently. Conclusion Our study revealed that parents assess their child’s pain and distress as a global entity, with great confidence in their own assessment and decision-making. For most parents, the desire to relieve their children’s pain outweighed concerns of addiction, misuse, and adverse events when making decisions about opioid analgesia for short-term use. These results can inform evidence-based family-centred approaches to co-decision-making of analgesic plans for children with acute pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatrics & child health\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatrics & child health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxad055.075\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatrics & child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxad055.075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景父母/照顾者往往是孩子疼痛药物管理的把关人。父母在评估孩子的疼痛反应方面的独特专长,以及保护孩子的深层情感驱动,使他们成为宝贵的倡导者和合作伙伴。父母在优化儿童疼痛管理结果方面投入了大量资金。对药物(包括阿片类药物)的担忧和偏好会影响他们的选择。提高对护理人员决策的理解应鼓励以家庭为中心的方法与父母沟通,以决定急性疼痛儿童的镇痛方案,促进共享临床决策,并优化临床环境中的儿科疼痛管理结果。我们的主要目标是探索和理解护理人员的决策,因为它与急诊科儿童的急性疼痛管理有关,特别关注阿片类药物。设计/方法:本定性研究纳入一项正在进行的儿科临床试验(“The No OUCH Trials”,NCT03767933),旨在评估口服阿片类药物(氢吗啡酮)和非阿片类药物(布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚)镇痛药联合治疗儿童肌肉骨骼损伤相关疼痛的临床疗效。本研究采用一对一半结构化访谈。急性肌肉骨骼损伤儿童的父母从加拿大三家儿科急诊科(斯托勒里儿童医院[埃德蒙顿,阿尔塔省])招募。, CHU Sainte-Justine[蒙特利尔,ququire]。和温尼伯儿童医院[温尼伯,曼.])。采访于2019年6月至2021年3月期间通过电话进行。逐字抄写和专题分析与数据收集同时进行,支持数据饱和和理论发展考虑。结果共完成27次访谈。关于疼痛评估和治疗的五个主要主题出现了:a)我孩子的舒适是优先考虑的;b)每个情况都是独一无二的;c)仅在必要时使用阿片类药物;d)选择阿片类药物时的考虑因素;e)疼痛研究很重要。总的来说,父母对他们对孩子疼痛的评估非常满意。参与者是否愿意为他们的孩子使用阿片类镇痛药主要取决于对损伤和疼痛严重程度的感知。尽管阿片类药物使用的考虑因素在阿片类药物厌恶家庭和阿片类药物愿意家庭之间是相似的,但在最大限度地缓解疼痛和最大限度地降低风险之间的权衡是不同的。我们的研究表明,父母将孩子的痛苦和困扰作为一个整体来评估,对自己的评估和决策有很大的信心。对于大多数父母来说,在决定短期使用阿片类镇痛药时,减轻孩子疼痛的愿望超过了对成瘾、滥用和不良事件的担忧。这些结果可以为以证据为基础的以家庭为中心的方法提供信息,以共同决策急性疼痛儿童的镇痛计划。
75 Factors that Influence Parental Decision-making Regarding Analgesia for their Children with Musculoskeletal Injury-related Pain: A Qualitative Study
Abstract Background Parents/caregivers are often the gatekeepers for the pharmacologic management of their children’s pain. Parents’ unique expertise in assessing their children’s pain reactions, alongside a deep emotional drive to protect their children, make them invaluable advocates and partners. Parents are highly invested in optimizing pain management outcomes for children. Concerns and preferences regarding medications, including opioids, influence their choices. An improved understanding of caregiver decision-making should encourage a family-centred approach to communication with parents when deciding analgesic plans for children with acute pain, facilitate shared clinical decision-making, and optimize paediatric pain management outcomes in the clinical setting. Objectives Our primary objective was to explore and understand caregiver decision-making as it relates to acute pain management for children presenting to the emergency department, with particular focus on opioids. Design/Methods This qualitative study was embedded within an ongoing paediatric clinical trial (‘The No OUCH Trials’, NCT03767933), which aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a combination of oral opioid (hydromorphone) and non-opioid (ibuprofen and acetaminophen) analgesics to manage paediatric musculoskeletal injury-related pain. This study employed one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Parents of children with acute musculoskeletal injuries were recruited from three Canadian paediatric emergency departments (Stollery Children’s Hospital [Edmonton, Alta.], CHU Sainte-Justine [Montreal, Qué.], and Winnipeg Children’s Hospital [Winnipeg, Man.]). Interviews were conducted via telephone from June 2019 to March 2021. Verbatim transcription and thematic analyses occurred concurrently with data collection, supporting data saturation and theory development considerations. Results Twenty-seven interviews were completed. Five major themes regarding pain assessment and treatment emerged: a) My child’s comfort is a priority; b) Every situation is unique; c) Opioids only if necessary; d) Considerations when choosing opioids; and e) Pain research is important. Overall, parents were highly comfortable with their assessment of their child’s pain. Participants’ willingness to use opioid analgesia for their children was primarily dependent on perceptions of injury and pain severity. Although considerations for opioid use were similar between opioid-averse and opioid-willing families, the trade-offs between maximizing pain relief and minimizing risks were weighed differently. Conclusion Our study revealed that parents assess their child’s pain and distress as a global entity, with great confidence in their own assessment and decision-making. For most parents, the desire to relieve their children’s pain outweighed concerns of addiction, misuse, and adverse events when making decisions about opioid analgesia for short-term use. These results can inform evidence-based family-centred approaches to co-decision-making of analgesic plans for children with acute pain.
期刊介绍:
Paediatrics & Child Health (PCH) is the official journal of the Canadian Paediatric Society, and the only peer-reviewed paediatric journal in Canada. Its mission is to advocate for the health and well-being of all Canadian children and youth and to educate child and youth health professionals across the country.
PCH reaches 8,000 paediatricians, family physicians and other child and youth health professionals, as well as ministers and officials in various levels of government who are involved with child and youth health policy in Canada.