决策辅助程序影响前列腺癌治疗患者后悔:随机对照试验的系统回顾

Q4 Medicine Palliative Medicine in Practice Pub Date : 2023-09-04 DOI:10.5603/pmp.96856
Muhammad Luthfi Adnan, Widyo Nugroho Utomo, Miranti Dewi Pramaningtyas
{"title":"决策辅助程序影响前列腺癌治疗患者后悔:随机对照试验的系统回顾","authors":"Muhammad Luthfi Adnan, Widyo Nugroho Utomo, Miranti Dewi Pramaningtyas","doi":"10.5603/pmp.96856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Long-term treatment and associated side effects can affect a patient's quality of life, one of which is the patient's regret during the treatment program of prostate cancer. The Decision Aid (DA) program can help patients with chronic diseases to face disease treatment, but the effect on the treatment of prostate cancer patients has not been evaluated further. This study aims to assess the effect of a decision aid program on treatment regret in prostate cancer patients. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines with the search engines PubMed and Google Scholar from January–March 2023. The inclusion criteria used were randomized controlled-trial studies with full text in English, published for the last ten years, the decision regret during or after treatment program was reported and the type of regret measurement was described. Results: Based on a literature search, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. The relationship between decision aid and regret was not significantly lower, but has significant effect for long-term (12 months) and in minority ethnic. Studies on a wider and heterogeneous population are needed to assess the effect of decision aids on the perspective of patients with prostate cancer programs. Conclusions: Decision aid may affect the level of regret of prostate cancer patients in the treatment program.","PeriodicalId":19965,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine in Practice","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision aid program affect regret in patients with prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Luthfi Adnan, Widyo Nugroho Utomo, Miranti Dewi Pramaningtyas\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/pmp.96856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Long-term treatment and associated side effects can affect a patient's quality of life, one of which is the patient's regret during the treatment program of prostate cancer. The Decision Aid (DA) program can help patients with chronic diseases to face disease treatment, but the effect on the treatment of prostate cancer patients has not been evaluated further. This study aims to assess the effect of a decision aid program on treatment regret in prostate cancer patients. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines with the search engines PubMed and Google Scholar from January–March 2023. The inclusion criteria used were randomized controlled-trial studies with full text in English, published for the last ten years, the decision regret during or after treatment program was reported and the type of regret measurement was described. Results: Based on a literature search, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. The relationship between decision aid and regret was not significantly lower, but has significant effect for long-term (12 months) and in minority ethnic. Studies on a wider and heterogeneous population are needed to assess the effect of decision aids on the perspective of patients with prostate cancer programs. Conclusions: Decision aid may affect the level of regret of prostate cancer patients in the treatment program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Medicine in Practice\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Medicine in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/pmp.96856\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/pmp.96856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期治疗和相关的副作用会影响患者的生活质量,其中之一就是患者在前列腺癌治疗方案期间的后悔。决策辅助(DA)计划可以帮助慢性病患者面对疾病治疗,但对前列腺癌患者的治疗效果尚未得到进一步评估。本研究旨在评估决策辅助程序对前列腺癌患者治疗后悔的影响。方法:本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行,检索引擎为PubMed和Google Scholar,检索时间为2023年1 - 3月。入选标准为近十年发表的随机对照试验研究,有英文全文,报告了治疗计划期间或之后的决定后悔,并描述了后悔测量的类型。结果:经文献检索,有5项研究符合纳入标准。决策辅助与后悔的关系不显著降低,但对长期(12个月)和少数民族有显著影响。需要对更广泛的异质人群进行研究,以评估决策辅助对前列腺癌项目患者观点的影响。结论:辅助决策可能影响前列腺癌患者在治疗方案中的后悔程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decision aid program affect regret in patients with prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Introduction: Long-term treatment and associated side effects can affect a patient's quality of life, one of which is the patient's regret during the treatment program of prostate cancer. The Decision Aid (DA) program can help patients with chronic diseases to face disease treatment, but the effect on the treatment of prostate cancer patients has not been evaluated further. This study aims to assess the effect of a decision aid program on treatment regret in prostate cancer patients. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines with the search engines PubMed and Google Scholar from January–March 2023. The inclusion criteria used were randomized controlled-trial studies with full text in English, published for the last ten years, the decision regret during or after treatment program was reported and the type of regret measurement was described. Results: Based on a literature search, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. The relationship between decision aid and regret was not significantly lower, but has significant effect for long-term (12 months) and in minority ethnic. Studies on a wider and heterogeneous population are needed to assess the effect of decision aids on the perspective of patients with prostate cancer programs. Conclusions: Decision aid may affect the level of regret of prostate cancer patients in the treatment program.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine in Practice
Palliative Medicine in Practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and experiences about medical cannabis in palliative care patients and caregivers in Thailand: a qualitative study Effectiveness of an online educational intervention for pressure injury prevention in caregivers: a pre-test post-test study Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) in a Palliative care setting Unravelling the landscape of image-guided radiotherapy: a comprehensive overview Gastrostomies and clinical outcomes: a cohort of different enteral feeding techniques in advanced cancer palliative care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1