区块链与善政权:善政全球化的阻碍还是阻碍?

Migle Laukyte
{"title":"区块链与善政权:善政全球化的阻碍还是阻碍?","authors":"Migle Laukyte","doi":"10.2979/gls.2023.a886167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: In this article, the author addresses the complex and multifaceted relationship between the right to good administration enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the uses of blockchain technology by the public administration, which is in charge of making the right to good administration real. The opportunities and threats come hand in hand, and there is an urgent need to push forward a public debate on the uses and misuses of blockchain to guarantee public services, so much so that many aspects of blockchain are not compatible with citizens' expectations in relation to the public sector. Although the focus is on Europe, and the right to good administration is not technically recognized on the international level, the globalization produced by technological advancements on the one hand, and the emergence of global administrative law on the other hand, makes this debate relevant to the rest of the democratic states that want to foster human-centric technologies for the well-being of their citizens.","PeriodicalId":39188,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blockchain and the Right to Good Administration: Adding Blocks to or Blocking of the Globalization of Good Administration?\",\"authors\":\"Migle Laukyte\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/gls.2023.a886167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT: In this article, the author addresses the complex and multifaceted relationship between the right to good administration enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the uses of blockchain technology by the public administration, which is in charge of making the right to good administration real. The opportunities and threats come hand in hand, and there is an urgent need to push forward a public debate on the uses and misuses of blockchain to guarantee public services, so much so that many aspects of blockchain are not compatible with citizens' expectations in relation to the public sector. Although the focus is on Europe, and the right to good administration is not technically recognized on the international level, the globalization produced by technological advancements on the one hand, and the emergence of global administrative law on the other hand, makes this debate relevant to the rest of the democratic states that want to foster human-centric technologies for the well-being of their citizens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2023.a886167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2023.a886167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:在本文中,作者论述了《欧盟基本权利宪章》中规定的善政权与负责实现善政权的公共行政部门使用区块链技术之间复杂而多方面的关系。机遇和威胁齐头并进,迫切需要就区块链的使用和滥用进行公开辩论,以保证公共服务,以至于区块链的许多方面都不符合公民对公共部门的期望。虽然焦点集中在欧洲,良好行政的权利在国际层面上并没有得到技术上的承认,但一方面,技术进步所产生的全球化,另一方面,全球行政法的出现,使得这场辩论与其他民主国家有关,这些国家希望为其公民的福祉培育以人为本的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Blockchain and the Right to Good Administration: Adding Blocks to or Blocking of the Globalization of Good Administration?
ABSTRACT: In this article, the author addresses the complex and multifaceted relationship between the right to good administration enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the uses of blockchain technology by the public administration, which is in charge of making the right to good administration real. The opportunities and threats come hand in hand, and there is an urgent need to push forward a public debate on the uses and misuses of blockchain to guarantee public services, so much so that many aspects of blockchain are not compatible with citizens' expectations in relation to the public sector. Although the focus is on Europe, and the right to good administration is not technically recognized on the international level, the globalization produced by technological advancements on the one hand, and the emergence of global administrative law on the other hand, makes this debate relevant to the rest of the democratic states that want to foster human-centric technologies for the well-being of their citizens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managing Digital Resale in the Era of International Exhaustion The Digital Transformation of Tax Systems Progress, Pitfalls, and Protection in a Danish Context Blockchain and the Right to Good Administration: Adding Blocks to or Blocking of the Globalization of Good Administration? The Risk of Digitalization: Transforming Government into a Digital Leviathan Guilty of Probable Cause: Public Arrest Records and Dignity in the Information Age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1