{"title":"规范域中的原因减法","authors":"Federico L. G. Faroldi","doi":"10.1007/s11196-023-10048-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Practical reasons can be aggregated to decide what one ought to do. This paper explores an operation that undoes aggregation: subtraction. I consider several distinctions concerning subtraction: subtracting content and subtracting strength; and subtracting one reason from one other reason or from a set of reasons. I put forward a precise understanding of subtracting the content of one reason from another, based on an operation of difference on a state-like, structured notion of content. Finally, I apply my approach to subtracting reasons to normative domains, and in particular to belief revision and norm change.","PeriodicalId":376841,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique","volume":"118 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subtracting Reasons in Normative Domains\",\"authors\":\"Federico L. G. Faroldi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11196-023-10048-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Practical reasons can be aggregated to decide what one ought to do. This paper explores an operation that undoes aggregation: subtraction. I consider several distinctions concerning subtraction: subtracting content and subtracting strength; and subtracting one reason from one other reason or from a set of reasons. I put forward a precise understanding of subtracting the content of one reason from another, based on an operation of difference on a state-like, structured notion of content. Finally, I apply my approach to subtracting reasons to normative domains, and in particular to belief revision and norm change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique\",\"volume\":\"118 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10048-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10048-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实际的理由可以综合起来决定一个人应该做什么。本文探讨了一种取消聚合的操作:减法。我考虑了减法的几个区别:减法内容和减法强度;用一个原因减去另一个原因或者从一系列原因中减去一个原因。我提出了一个关于从一个原因减去另一个原因的内容的精确理解,这是基于一个类似于状态的、结构化的内容概念的差异操作。最后,我将我的方法应用于减少规范性领域的原因,特别是信念修正和规范改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Subtracting Reasons in Normative Domains
Abstract Practical reasons can be aggregated to decide what one ought to do. This paper explores an operation that undoes aggregation: subtraction. I consider several distinctions concerning subtraction: subtracting content and subtracting strength; and subtracting one reason from one other reason or from a set of reasons. I put forward a precise understanding of subtracting the content of one reason from another, based on an operation of difference on a state-like, structured notion of content. Finally, I apply my approach to subtracting reasons to normative domains, and in particular to belief revision and norm change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Corpus - Critical Discourse Analysis of the Representation of the Yemeni Violent Crisis in the Press The Overreliance on Termed Imprisonment and the Challenges within Youth Criminal Sentencing Framework: The Case of Vietnam State Sovereignty: Concept and Conceptions Image jurilinguistique des animaux dans les codes civils français et polonais Reading “Il Diritto Africano” Some Thirty Years Later: a Brief Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1