{"title":"深层与表层:古代文学批评与怀疑的解释学","authors":"Benjamin Willstead","doi":"10.1353/are.2023.a907200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Meandering its way from Philodemus’s On Poems through to the writings of the Byzantine scholars Cometas and Leo the Philosopher, this article attempts to outline and identify the use of metaphors of “surface” and “depth” as they apply to texts in ancient literary criticism and compare such instances with their use today. In doing so, the hope is to weaponize classical texts to provide a means to think beyond “suspicious” hermeneutic approaches to literature, and to demonstrate the pitfalls of more recent attempts by literary scholars to do just this.","PeriodicalId":44750,"journal":{"name":"ARETHUSA","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Surfaces and Surficial Depths: Ancient Literary Criticism and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Willstead\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/are.2023.a907200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Meandering its way from Philodemus’s On Poems through to the writings of the Byzantine scholars Cometas and Leo the Philosopher, this article attempts to outline and identify the use of metaphors of “surface” and “depth” as they apply to texts in ancient literary criticism and compare such instances with their use today. In doing so, the hope is to weaponize classical texts to provide a means to think beyond “suspicious” hermeneutic approaches to literature, and to demonstrate the pitfalls of more recent attempts by literary scholars to do just this.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARETHUSA\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARETHUSA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2023.a907200\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARETHUSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2023.a907200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deep Surfaces and Surficial Depths: Ancient Literary Criticism and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion
Meandering its way from Philodemus’s On Poems through to the writings of the Byzantine scholars Cometas and Leo the Philosopher, this article attempts to outline and identify the use of metaphors of “surface” and “depth” as they apply to texts in ancient literary criticism and compare such instances with their use today. In doing so, the hope is to weaponize classical texts to provide a means to think beyond “suspicious” hermeneutic approaches to literature, and to demonstrate the pitfalls of more recent attempts by literary scholars to do just this.
期刊介绍:
Arethusa is known for publishing original literary and cultural studies of the ancient world and of the field of classics that combine contemporary theoretical perspectives with more traditional approaches to literary and material evidence. Interdisciplinary in nature, this distinguished journal often features special thematic issues.