临床能力的“真实”评估:我们所处的位置和未来的发展方向

Abu Sadat Mohammad Nurunnabi, Riffat Rahim, Dilara Alo, Md Abdul Muqueet, Hasan Hafizur Rahman, Nelema Jahan, Mohammad Abu Sayeed Talukder, Thanadar Tamjeeda Tapu
{"title":"临床能力的“真实”评估:我们所处的位置和未来的发展方向","authors":"Abu Sadat Mohammad Nurunnabi, Riffat Rahim, Dilara Alo, Md Abdul Muqueet, Hasan Hafizur Rahman, Nelema Jahan, Mohammad Abu Sayeed Talukder, Thanadar Tamjeeda Tapu","doi":"10.3329/mumcj.v6i1.68987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assessment of clinical competence is one of the most difficult tasks facing medical education. Teaching and assessment need to be meaningful for the students and their relevance in real life context and challenges should be apparent. Ideally, assessment tasks should require students to use the same competencies, or combinations of knowledge, skills, and attitudes that they need to apply in their future professional life. However, for the medical teachers of our country the term “authentic assessment” is very new, as most of them are very stick to traditional assessment while running a course or training students in different medical colleges. Clinical competence is an extremely complex construct and one that requires multiple, mixed, and higher order methods of assessment. As we have experienced a recent pandemic situation, it seems that plenty of questions remain in relation to clinical competence assessment in medical colleges for now and near future. In authentic assessment, students will go beyond the textual reproduction of fragmented and low order content and move towards understanding, establishing relationships between new ideas and previous knowledge, linking theoretical concepts with everyday experience, deriving conclusions from the analysis of data, allowing them to examine both the logic of the arguments present in the theory, as well as its practical scope. That is why we are moving away from traditional, limited test formats to new, more complex, yet innovative, mixed methods of ‘authentic’ assessment – from faculty observation ratings and paper-and-pencil examinations to online MCQ tests, SBA questions, experimentation with advanced OSPE and OSCE, and project-based assessment supplemented with clinical reasoning. These moves are expected to bring not only several challenges but also great educational rewards for the measurement and advancement of clinical competence among students. We would like to continue to work on those progressions. Mugda Med Coll J. 2023; 6(1): 37-43","PeriodicalId":499854,"journal":{"name":"Mugda Medical College Journal","volume":"416 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Authentic’ Assessment of Clinical Competence: Where We Are and Where We Want to Go in Future\",\"authors\":\"Abu Sadat Mohammad Nurunnabi, Riffat Rahim, Dilara Alo, Md Abdul Muqueet, Hasan Hafizur Rahman, Nelema Jahan, Mohammad Abu Sayeed Talukder, Thanadar Tamjeeda Tapu\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/mumcj.v6i1.68987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The assessment of clinical competence is one of the most difficult tasks facing medical education. Teaching and assessment need to be meaningful for the students and their relevance in real life context and challenges should be apparent. Ideally, assessment tasks should require students to use the same competencies, or combinations of knowledge, skills, and attitudes that they need to apply in their future professional life. However, for the medical teachers of our country the term “authentic assessment” is very new, as most of them are very stick to traditional assessment while running a course or training students in different medical colleges. Clinical competence is an extremely complex construct and one that requires multiple, mixed, and higher order methods of assessment. As we have experienced a recent pandemic situation, it seems that plenty of questions remain in relation to clinical competence assessment in medical colleges for now and near future. In authentic assessment, students will go beyond the textual reproduction of fragmented and low order content and move towards understanding, establishing relationships between new ideas and previous knowledge, linking theoretical concepts with everyday experience, deriving conclusions from the analysis of data, allowing them to examine both the logic of the arguments present in the theory, as well as its practical scope. That is why we are moving away from traditional, limited test formats to new, more complex, yet innovative, mixed methods of ‘authentic’ assessment – from faculty observation ratings and paper-and-pencil examinations to online MCQ tests, SBA questions, experimentation with advanced OSPE and OSCE, and project-based assessment supplemented with clinical reasoning. These moves are expected to bring not only several challenges but also great educational rewards for the measurement and advancement of clinical competence among students. We would like to continue to work on those progressions. Mugda Med Coll J. 2023; 6(1): 37-43\",\"PeriodicalId\":499854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mugda Medical College Journal\",\"volume\":\"416 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mugda Medical College Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/mumcj.v6i1.68987\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mugda Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/mumcj.v6i1.68987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床能力评估是医学教育面临的最艰巨的任务之一。教学和评估需要对学生有意义,并且与现实生活环境和挑战的相关性应该很明显。理想情况下,评估任务应该要求学生使用相同的能力,或知识、技能和态度的组合,他们需要在未来的职业生涯中应用。然而,对于我国的医学教师来说,“真实评估”这个词是一个很新的概念,因为他们大多在不同的医学院校开设课程或培养学生时都非常坚持传统的评估。临床能力是一个极其复杂的结构,需要多种、混合的、高阶的评估方法。在经历了最近一次大流行的情况下,目前和不久的将来,医学院校的临床能力评估似乎还存在很多问题。在真实的评估中,学生将超越碎片化和低顺序内容的文本复制,并走向理解,建立新思想和先前知识之间的关系,将理论概念与日常经验联系起来,从数据分析中得出结论,使他们能够检查理论中论点的逻辑,以及它的实际范围。这就是为什么我们正在从传统的、有限的测试形式转向新的、更复杂的、创新的、“真实”评估的混合方法——从教师观察评级和纸笔考试到在线MCQ测试、SBA问题、先进的ose和OSCE实验,以及辅以临床推理的基于项目的评估。预计这些举措不仅带来了一些挑战,但也为学生临床能力的测量和提高带来了巨大的教育回报。我们将继续为这些进展而努力。中华医学杂志[j];6 (1): 37-43
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Authentic’ Assessment of Clinical Competence: Where We Are and Where We Want to Go in Future
The assessment of clinical competence is one of the most difficult tasks facing medical education. Teaching and assessment need to be meaningful for the students and their relevance in real life context and challenges should be apparent. Ideally, assessment tasks should require students to use the same competencies, or combinations of knowledge, skills, and attitudes that they need to apply in their future professional life. However, for the medical teachers of our country the term “authentic assessment” is very new, as most of them are very stick to traditional assessment while running a course or training students in different medical colleges. Clinical competence is an extremely complex construct and one that requires multiple, mixed, and higher order methods of assessment. As we have experienced a recent pandemic situation, it seems that plenty of questions remain in relation to clinical competence assessment in medical colleges for now and near future. In authentic assessment, students will go beyond the textual reproduction of fragmented and low order content and move towards understanding, establishing relationships between new ideas and previous knowledge, linking theoretical concepts with everyday experience, deriving conclusions from the analysis of data, allowing them to examine both the logic of the arguments present in the theory, as well as its practical scope. That is why we are moving away from traditional, limited test formats to new, more complex, yet innovative, mixed methods of ‘authentic’ assessment – from faculty observation ratings and paper-and-pencil examinations to online MCQ tests, SBA questions, experimentation with advanced OSPE and OSCE, and project-based assessment supplemented with clinical reasoning. These moves are expected to bring not only several challenges but also great educational rewards for the measurement and advancement of clinical competence among students. We would like to continue to work on those progressions. Mugda Med Coll J. 2023; 6(1): 37-43
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anti-inflammatory Effect of Methanolic Extract of Mangifera Indica Leaves on Inflammed Rats in Comparison to Indomethacin Comparison of Treatment Outcome of Ganciclovir Ophthalmic Gel and Moxifloxacin Eye Drop in Acute Adenoviral Keratoconjunctivitis Ophthalmic Manifestations of Leukemia and Their Management Anthropometric Study of Correlation between the Selected Craniofacial Measurements with the Stature in Adult Bangladeshi Manipuri Males Modified D2 Gastrectomy operation in Gastric Cancer Patients and Outcome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1