PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗晚期肝细胞癌的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Tzu Chi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_159_23
Tzu-Rong Peng, Li-Jou Yang, Ta-Wei Wu
{"title":"PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗晚期肝细胞癌的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Tzu-Rong Peng, Li-Jou Yang, Ta-Wei Wu","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_159_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A BSTRACT Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published until November 2022. Studies reporting the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with advanced HCC were eligible for inclusion. The outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and ≥ Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TrAEs). Results: Fourteen trials with 4515 patients with HCC were included. Our results showed that treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was associated with better ORR and DCR than that with control (placebo or sorafenib or lenvatinib) (odds ratio [OR], 3.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.55–5.95 and OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.11–1.95, respectively). The overall hazard ratio (HR) of PFS and OS were 0.66 (95% CI 0.56–0.78) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.55–0.77), respectively. In subgroup analysis, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination therapy had an advantage in terms of PFS (HR: 0.57 vs. 0.81) compared to that of PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. The incidence of grade 3–5 TrAEs was not significantly higher with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors than that with the control (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.70–1.81). However, the combination of PD-1inhibitor with higher incidence of Grade 3–5 TrAEs (OR: 2.04, 95% CI 0.66–6.32) than the combination PD-L1 inhibitor (OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.50–1.81). Conclusion: The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and targeted agents significantly improved the clinical outcomes in patients with advanced HCC. However, the incidence of Grade 3–5 TrAEs with PD-1 inhibitor combination therapy was higher than the combination PD-L1 inhibitor.","PeriodicalId":45873,"journal":{"name":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","volume":"95 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Tzu-Rong Peng, Li-Jou Yang, Ta-Wei Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_159_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A BSTRACT Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published until November 2022. Studies reporting the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with advanced HCC were eligible for inclusion. The outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and ≥ Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TrAEs). Results: Fourteen trials with 4515 patients with HCC were included. Our results showed that treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was associated with better ORR and DCR than that with control (placebo or sorafenib or lenvatinib) (odds ratio [OR], 3.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.55–5.95 and OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.11–1.95, respectively). The overall hazard ratio (HR) of PFS and OS were 0.66 (95% CI 0.56–0.78) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.55–0.77), respectively. In subgroup analysis, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination therapy had an advantage in terms of PFS (HR: 0.57 vs. 0.81) compared to that of PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. The incidence of grade 3–5 TrAEs was not significantly higher with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors than that with the control (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.70–1.81). However, the combination of PD-1inhibitor with higher incidence of Grade 3–5 TrAEs (OR: 2.04, 95% CI 0.66–6.32) than the combination PD-L1 inhibitor (OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.50–1.81). Conclusion: The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and targeted agents significantly improved the clinical outcomes in patients with advanced HCC. However, the incidence of Grade 3–5 TrAEs with PD-1 inhibitor combination therapy was higher than the combination PD-L1 inhibitor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tzu Chi Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"95 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tzu Chi Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_159_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_159_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨程序性细胞死亡-1 (PD-1)/程序性死亡配体-1 (PD-L1)抑制剂在晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane Library,检索截止到2022年11月发表的文章。报道PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂对晚期HCC患者疗效的研究符合纳入条件。结果包括客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和≥3级治疗相关不良事件(TrAEs)。结果:纳入14项试验,4515例HCC患者。我们的研究结果显示,与对照组(安慰剂、索拉非尼或lenvatinib)相比,PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗的ORR和DCR更好(优势比[or], 3.89;95%置信区间(CI)为2.55 ~ 5.95,OR为1.47;95% CI分别为1.11-1.95)。PFS的总体风险比(人力资源)和操作系统分别为0.66 (95% CI 0.56 - -0.78)和0.65 (95% CI 0.55 - -0.77),分别。在亚组分析中,PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合治疗在PFS方面比PD-1/PD-L1单药治疗有优势(HR: 0.57 vs. 0.81)。PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂组3-5级trae的发生率与对照组相比没有显著升高(OR, 1.12;95%可信区间,0.70 - -1.81)。然而,联合pd -1抑制剂的3-5级TrAEs发生率(OR: 2.04, 95% CI 0.66-6.32)高于联合PD-L1抑制剂(OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.50-1.81)。结论:PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合靶向药物可显著改善晚期HCC患者的临床预后。然而,PD-1抑制剂联合治疗的3-5级TrAEs发生率高于PD-L1抑制剂联合治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
A BSTRACT Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published until November 2022. Studies reporting the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with advanced HCC were eligible for inclusion. The outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and ≥ Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TrAEs). Results: Fourteen trials with 4515 patients with HCC were included. Our results showed that treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was associated with better ORR and DCR than that with control (placebo or sorafenib or lenvatinib) (odds ratio [OR], 3.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.55–5.95 and OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.11–1.95, respectively). The overall hazard ratio (HR) of PFS and OS were 0.66 (95% CI 0.56–0.78) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.55–0.77), respectively. In subgroup analysis, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination therapy had an advantage in terms of PFS (HR: 0.57 vs. 0.81) compared to that of PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. The incidence of grade 3–5 TrAEs was not significantly higher with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors than that with the control (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.70–1.81). However, the combination of PD-1inhibitor with higher incidence of Grade 3–5 TrAEs (OR: 2.04, 95% CI 0.66–6.32) than the combination PD-L1 inhibitor (OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.50–1.81). Conclusion: The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and targeted agents significantly improved the clinical outcomes in patients with advanced HCC. However, the incidence of Grade 3–5 TrAEs with PD-1 inhibitor combination therapy was higher than the combination PD-L1 inhibitor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Tzu Chi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Tzu Chi Medical Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, and includes original research papers on clinical medicine and basic science, case reports, clinical pathological pages, and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Epigenetic modification in radiotherapy and immunotherapy for cancers. Natural phytochemicals as small-molecule proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. The obesity paradox exists in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of body mass index effects on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in Asia. Unraveling the interplay between inflammation and stem cell mobilization or homing: Implications for tissue repair and therapeutics. C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12-C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 signaling axis in cancer and the development of chemotherapeutic molecules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1