Raymond Hung Kei Wong, Raymond Wing Cheong Au, Chan Wai Lan, Chiu Pi Fan, Frank Pi Fan Chiu, Mann Man Keung Chu, Thomas Chung Lung Kong, Ada Wai Yu Lo, Donald Chi Shing Mak, Justina KP Wong, Sharifa YP Yam
{"title":"一项关于精神分裂症谱系障碍患者精简疾病管理和康复计划有效性的随机对照试验","authors":"Raymond Hung Kei Wong, Raymond Wing Cheong Au, Chan Wai Lan, Chiu Pi Fan, Frank Pi Fan Chiu, Mann Man Keung Chu, Thomas Chung Lung Kong, Ada Wai Yu Lo, Donald Chi Shing Mak, Justina KP Wong, Sharifa YP Yam","doi":"10.1177/15691861231204904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of an abridged version of the Illness Management and Recovery Programme (AIMR) that was modified and developed in Hong Kong through a mult-centre randomized controlled trial for patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Methods This study was implemented in 10 occupational therapy departments, psychiatric day hospitals of 7 Hospital Authority clusters in Hong Kong. A total of 211 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was recruited and randomized into either the experimental or the control condition. In the control group, the subjects went through conventional occupational therapy programmes. In the experimental group, the subjects went through an additional 10-session programme of AIMR. Participants were measured at baseline, completion of the AIMR, and 3-month after the AIMR programme. Measures include the expanded version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-E), the client version of the Illness Management and Recovery Scale (IMRS), the Snyder Hope Scale, the Social and Occupational and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), the WHO Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF), and the Chinese Version of the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (C-SWEMWBS). Results Both the experimental and control cohorts had comparable clinical and socio-demographic characteristics except years of education and duration of illness. These two variables were entered as covariates in the linear mixed model which showed that the experimental group had significantly higher improvement than the control group in terms of illness management (F = 4.82; p = .03; Cohen’s d = .45), functional (F = 10.65; p = .001; Cohen’s d = .58), and hope (F = 5.52; p = .02; Cohen’s d = .08) measures after the completion of treatment. Conclusion The results supported the effectiveness of the AIMR programm which would be important in the recovery oriented practices in psychiatry.","PeriodicalId":55049,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of the abridged illness management and recovery program for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders\",\"authors\":\"Raymond Hung Kei Wong, Raymond Wing Cheong Au, Chan Wai Lan, Chiu Pi Fan, Frank Pi Fan Chiu, Mann Man Keung Chu, Thomas Chung Lung Kong, Ada Wai Yu Lo, Donald Chi Shing Mak, Justina KP Wong, Sharifa YP Yam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15691861231204904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of an abridged version of the Illness Management and Recovery Programme (AIMR) that was modified and developed in Hong Kong through a mult-centre randomized controlled trial for patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Methods This study was implemented in 10 occupational therapy departments, psychiatric day hospitals of 7 Hospital Authority clusters in Hong Kong. A total of 211 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was recruited and randomized into either the experimental or the control condition. In the control group, the subjects went through conventional occupational therapy programmes. In the experimental group, the subjects went through an additional 10-session programme of AIMR. Participants were measured at baseline, completion of the AIMR, and 3-month after the AIMR programme. Measures include the expanded version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-E), the client version of the Illness Management and Recovery Scale (IMRS), the Snyder Hope Scale, the Social and Occupational and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), the WHO Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF), and the Chinese Version of the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (C-SWEMWBS). Results Both the experimental and control cohorts had comparable clinical and socio-demographic characteristics except years of education and duration of illness. These two variables were entered as covariates in the linear mixed model which showed that the experimental group had significantly higher improvement than the control group in terms of illness management (F = 4.82; p = .03; Cohen’s d = .45), functional (F = 10.65; p = .001; Cohen’s d = .58), and hope (F = 5.52; p = .02; Cohen’s d = .08) measures after the completion of treatment. Conclusion The results supported the effectiveness of the AIMR programm which would be important in the recovery oriented practices in psychiatry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15691861231204904\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15691861231204904","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在通过一项多中心随机对照试验,探讨在香港修订和发展的精简版疾病管理和康复计划(AIMR)对精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的有效性。方法本研究在香港7个医院管理局分院的10个职业治疗科、精神科日间医院进行。共招募了211名精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者,并随机分为实验组和对照组。在对照组,受试者接受传统的职业治疗方案。在实验组中,受试者进行了额外的10次AIMR训练。参与者在基线、完成AIMR和AIMR项目后3个月进行测量。测量方法包括扩展版精神病学简易评定量表(BPRS-E)、客户版疾病管理与康复量表(IMRS)、Snyder Hope量表、社会与职业与职业功能评估量表(SOFAS)、WHO生活质量量表(WHOQOL-BREF)和中文版华威-爱丁堡心理健康简易量表(C-SWEMWBS)。结果除了受教育年限和疾病持续时间外,实验组和对照组的临床和社会人口学特征具有可比性。这两个变量作为协变量输入到线性混合模型中,结果表明实验组在疾病管理方面的改善明显高于对照组(F = 4.82;P = .03;Cohen’s d = 0.45),泛函(F = 10.65;P = .001;Cohen’s d = .58)和hope (F = 5.52;P = .02;Cohen’s d = .08)。结论本研究结果支持AIMR项目的有效性,在精神病学康复实践中具有重要意义。
A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of the abridged illness management and recovery program for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders
Objective This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of an abridged version of the Illness Management and Recovery Programme (AIMR) that was modified and developed in Hong Kong through a mult-centre randomized controlled trial for patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Methods This study was implemented in 10 occupational therapy departments, psychiatric day hospitals of 7 Hospital Authority clusters in Hong Kong. A total of 211 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was recruited and randomized into either the experimental or the control condition. In the control group, the subjects went through conventional occupational therapy programmes. In the experimental group, the subjects went through an additional 10-session programme of AIMR. Participants were measured at baseline, completion of the AIMR, and 3-month after the AIMR programme. Measures include the expanded version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-E), the client version of the Illness Management and Recovery Scale (IMRS), the Snyder Hope Scale, the Social and Occupational and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), the WHO Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF), and the Chinese Version of the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (C-SWEMWBS). Results Both the experimental and control cohorts had comparable clinical and socio-demographic characteristics except years of education and duration of illness. These two variables were entered as covariates in the linear mixed model which showed that the experimental group had significantly higher improvement than the control group in terms of illness management (F = 4.82; p = .03; Cohen’s d = .45), functional (F = 10.65; p = .001; Cohen’s d = .58), and hope (F = 5.52; p = .02; Cohen’s d = .08) measures after the completion of treatment. Conclusion The results supported the effectiveness of the AIMR programm which would be important in the recovery oriented practices in psychiatry.
期刊介绍:
The Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy is the official peer-reviewed open access publication of the Hong Kong Occupational Therapy Association. The Journal aims to promote the development of theory and practice in occupational therapy (OT), and facilitate documentation and communication among educators, researchers and practitioners. It also works to advance availability, use, support and excellence of OT and maintain professional standards to promote better understanding of OT.