MRI检查安全管理的全国多机构随访调查研究

Minako AZUMA, Tsukasa DOI, Mitsuyuki TAKAHASHI, Hirofumi HATA, Tsuyoshi UEYAMA, Junji TAKAHASHI, Kazuyuki SAKAI, Noriko OYAMA-MANABE, Junichi HATA, Masako KATAOKA, Kagayaki KURODA, Shinpei IJICHI, Shigeki AOKI, Toshinori HIRAI
{"title":"MRI检查安全管理的全国多机构随访调查研究","authors":"Minako AZUMA, Tsukasa DOI, Mitsuyuki TAKAHASHI, Hirofumi HATA, Tsuyoshi UEYAMA, Junji TAKAHASHI, Kazuyuki SAKAI, Noriko OYAMA-MANABE, Junichi HATA, Masako KATAOKA, Kagayaki KURODA, Shinpei IJICHI, Shigeki AOKI, Toshinori HIRAI","doi":"10.2463/jjmrm.2023-1792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2022, a follow-up survey was conducted to the National Survey on Safety Management of MRI Examinations carried out in 2018. This study aimed to compare the two surveys to determine how the “Guidelines for the Safe Operation of Clinical MRI” affect the safe management of MRI examinations in clinical practice, and to identify factors associated with incidents affecting patient health. Automated machine learning was used to identify factors associated with major incidents. Of the 5,816 medical facilities we approached, 2,668 (45.9%) provided full or partial responses, with 2,582 (44.4%) valid responses. Although the number of facilities that participated in the survey and provided valid responses had increased by 567 from the previous survey, the response to safety management varied again in this survey. On the other hand, improvement was seen on most items related to safety management and MRI exam operations. Between October 2020 and September 2021, 242 major incidents occurred at 166 facilities (6%), a 1% increase from 2018. Most of these were related to contrast administration. Minor incidents also increased by 5% (2,068 incidents) at 833 facilities (32%). The largest contributor to the increase in major incidents was the number of examinations per month. Although there was wide variation in the safety standards applied by Japanese facilities performing clinical MRI examinations, facility responses improved for most items related to the safe management and operation of MRI scans.","PeriodicalId":471579,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Jiki Kyōmei Igakkai zasshi","volume":"233 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI検査の安全管理に対する全国多施設フォローアップ調査研究\",\"authors\":\"Minako AZUMA, Tsukasa DOI, Mitsuyuki TAKAHASHI, Hirofumi HATA, Tsuyoshi UEYAMA, Junji TAKAHASHI, Kazuyuki SAKAI, Noriko OYAMA-MANABE, Junichi HATA, Masako KATAOKA, Kagayaki KURODA, Shinpei IJICHI, Shigeki AOKI, Toshinori HIRAI\",\"doi\":\"10.2463/jjmrm.2023-1792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2022, a follow-up survey was conducted to the National Survey on Safety Management of MRI Examinations carried out in 2018. This study aimed to compare the two surveys to determine how the “Guidelines for the Safe Operation of Clinical MRI” affect the safe management of MRI examinations in clinical practice, and to identify factors associated with incidents affecting patient health. Automated machine learning was used to identify factors associated with major incidents. Of the 5,816 medical facilities we approached, 2,668 (45.9%) provided full or partial responses, with 2,582 (44.4%) valid responses. Although the number of facilities that participated in the survey and provided valid responses had increased by 567 from the previous survey, the response to safety management varied again in this survey. On the other hand, improvement was seen on most items related to safety management and MRI exam operations. Between October 2020 and September 2021, 242 major incidents occurred at 166 facilities (6%), a 1% increase from 2018. Most of these were related to contrast administration. Minor incidents also increased by 5% (2,068 incidents) at 833 facilities (32%). The largest contributor to the increase in major incidents was the number of examinations per month. Although there was wide variation in the safety standards applied by Japanese facilities performing clinical MRI examinations, facility responses improved for most items related to the safe management and operation of MRI scans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":471579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Jiki Kyōmei Igakkai zasshi\",\"volume\":\"233 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Jiki Kyōmei Igakkai zasshi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2463/jjmrm.2023-1792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Jiki Kyōmei Igakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/jjmrm.2023-1792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022年对2018年开展的《全国MRI检查安全管理调查》进行了后续调查。本研究旨在比较两项调查,以确定《临床MRI安全操作指南》在临床实践中如何影响MRI检查的安全管理,并确定影响患者健康的事件相关因素。自动机器学习用于识别与重大事件相关的因素。在我们接触的5816家医疗机构中,2668家(45.9%)提供了完整或部分回复,2582家(44.4%)提供了有效回复。虽然参与调查并提供有效答复的设施数量比上一次调查增加了567家,但在这次调查中,对安全管理的反应再次发生变化。另一方面,与安全管理和核磁共振检查操作相关的大多数项目都有所改善。2020年10月至2021年9月期间,166个设施发生了242起重大事故(6%),比2018年增加了1%。其中大多数与对照剂有关。在833个设施(32%)发生的轻微事故亦增加5%(2,068起)。重大事故增加的最大原因是每月的考试次数。尽管日本进行临床核磁共振检查的机构所采用的安全标准存在很大差异,但在与核磁共振扫描的安全管理和操作有关的大多数项目上,机构的反应都有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MRI検査の安全管理に対する全国多施設フォローアップ調査研究
In 2022, a follow-up survey was conducted to the National Survey on Safety Management of MRI Examinations carried out in 2018. This study aimed to compare the two surveys to determine how the “Guidelines for the Safe Operation of Clinical MRI” affect the safe management of MRI examinations in clinical practice, and to identify factors associated with incidents affecting patient health. Automated machine learning was used to identify factors associated with major incidents. Of the 5,816 medical facilities we approached, 2,668 (45.9%) provided full or partial responses, with 2,582 (44.4%) valid responses. Although the number of facilities that participated in the survey and provided valid responses had increased by 567 from the previous survey, the response to safety management varied again in this survey. On the other hand, improvement was seen on most items related to safety management and MRI exam operations. Between October 2020 and September 2021, 242 major incidents occurred at 166 facilities (6%), a 1% increase from 2018. Most of these were related to contrast administration. Minor incidents also increased by 5% (2,068 incidents) at 833 facilities (32%). The largest contributor to the increase in major incidents was the number of examinations per month. Although there was wide variation in the safety standards applied by Japanese facilities performing clinical MRI examinations, facility responses improved for most items related to the safe management and operation of MRI scans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptive Gaussian Search : A Novel Non-linear Minimization Technique [Presidential Award Proceedings] Variable TI UTE 4D-MRAへのTIDOR(TI依存型画像再構成最適化法)の適応による脳末梢血管描出能の改善[大会長賞記録] GRASP-VIBEを用いた非造影腎動脈MRAの試み 至適撮像条件の検討 経頭蓋MRガイド下集束超音波治療(transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery:TcMRgFUS)へのfiber tractography解析の応用 High-resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging for the Diagnosis of Endometrial and Cervical Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1