不同时间点静脉给药纳布啡对腺扁桃体切除术儿童术后镇痛镇静的影响:一项前瞻性、随机对照试验

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PEDIATRICS World Journal of Pediatric Surgery Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1136/wjps-2023-000662
Hongmin Cao, Chunying Bao, Haiya Tu, Jing Gao, Jinjin Huang, Qixing Chen
{"title":"不同时间点静脉给药纳布啡对腺扁桃体切除术儿童术后镇痛镇静的影响:一项前瞻性、随机对照试验","authors":"Hongmin Cao, Chunying Bao, Haiya Tu, Jing Gao, Jinjin Huang, Qixing Chen","doi":"10.1136/wjps-2023-000662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To compare the efficacy of intravenous administration of nalbuphine at different time points for postoperative analgesia and sedation in adenotonsillectomized children. Methods Patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome scheduled for adenotonsillectomy were randomly divided into group A (patients received intravenous nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg before anesthesia induction), group B (patients received intravenous nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg 10 min before the end of surgery), and group C (patients did not receive nalbuphine injection). The time points for measuring outcomes were before anesthesia induction (T0), extubation (T1), and 0, 15, 30, or 45 min in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) (T2–T5, respectively). Results There were 40 patients in group A, 41 patients in group B and 39 patients in group C. Patients in group B had significantly lower FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) pain scores at T2–T5 than those in group C (all p<0.05). Patients in group B had higher Ramsay Sedation Score at T2–T4 than those in group C (all p<0.05). The proportion of patients who received remedial analgesia in the PACU in group A (17.5%, p=0.008) and group B (9.8%, p<0.001) was significantly lower than that in group C (46.2%). Conclusion Intravenous administration of nalbuphine 10 min before the end of adenotonsillectomy in children could decrease pain intensity and increase sedation levels during the recovery period with the reduction of remedial analgesia in the PACU. Trial registration number ChiCTR2200060118.","PeriodicalId":23823,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of intravenous administration of nalbuphine at different time points for postoperative analgesia and sedation in adenotonsillectomized children: a prospective, randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Hongmin Cao, Chunying Bao, Haiya Tu, Jing Gao, Jinjin Huang, Qixing Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/wjps-2023-000662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To compare the efficacy of intravenous administration of nalbuphine at different time points for postoperative analgesia and sedation in adenotonsillectomized children. Methods Patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome scheduled for adenotonsillectomy were randomly divided into group A (patients received intravenous nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg before anesthesia induction), group B (patients received intravenous nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg 10 min before the end of surgery), and group C (patients did not receive nalbuphine injection). The time points for measuring outcomes were before anesthesia induction (T0), extubation (T1), and 0, 15, 30, or 45 min in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) (T2–T5, respectively). Results There were 40 patients in group A, 41 patients in group B and 39 patients in group C. Patients in group B had significantly lower FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) pain scores at T2–T5 than those in group C (all p<0.05). Patients in group B had higher Ramsay Sedation Score at T2–T4 than those in group C (all p<0.05). The proportion of patients who received remedial analgesia in the PACU in group A (17.5%, p=0.008) and group B (9.8%, p<0.001) was significantly lower than that in group C (46.2%). Conclusion Intravenous administration of nalbuphine 10 min before the end of adenotonsillectomy in children could decrease pain intensity and increase sedation levels during the recovery period with the reduction of remedial analgesia in the PACU. Trial registration number ChiCTR2200060118.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2023-000662\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2023-000662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较不同时间点静脉给药纳布啡用于小儿腺扁桃体切除术后镇痛镇静的效果。方法将拟行腺扁桃体切除术的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者随机分为A组(麻醉诱导前静脉注射纳布啡0.2 mg/kg)、B组(手术结束前10 min静脉注射纳布啡0.2 mg/kg)和C组(未注射纳布啡)。测量结果的时间点分别为麻醉诱导前(T0)、拔管前(T1)和麻醉后护理单元(PACU)的0、15、30或45分钟(分别为T2-T5)。结果A组40例,B组41例,C组39例。B组患者t2 ~ t5期FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability)疼痛评分显著低于C组(p < 0.05)。B组患者T2-T4 Ramsay Sedation Score高于C组(p < 0.05)。A组(17.5%,p=0.008)和B组(9.8%,p= 0.001)在PACU内接受治疗性镇痛的患者比例显著低于C组(46.2%)。结论小儿腺扁桃体切除术结束前10 min静脉给予纳布啡可减轻患儿恢复期的疼痛强度,增加镇静水平,减少PACU的治疗性镇痛。试验注册号ChiCTR2200060118。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of intravenous administration of nalbuphine at different time points for postoperative analgesia and sedation in adenotonsillectomized children: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
Objective To compare the efficacy of intravenous administration of nalbuphine at different time points for postoperative analgesia and sedation in adenotonsillectomized children. Methods Patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome scheduled for adenotonsillectomy were randomly divided into group A (patients received intravenous nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg before anesthesia induction), group B (patients received intravenous nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg 10 min before the end of surgery), and group C (patients did not receive nalbuphine injection). The time points for measuring outcomes were before anesthesia induction (T0), extubation (T1), and 0, 15, 30, or 45 min in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) (T2–T5, respectively). Results There were 40 patients in group A, 41 patients in group B and 39 patients in group C. Patients in group B had significantly lower FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) pain scores at T2–T5 than those in group C (all p<0.05). Patients in group B had higher Ramsay Sedation Score at T2–T4 than those in group C (all p<0.05). The proportion of patients who received remedial analgesia in the PACU in group A (17.5%, p=0.008) and group B (9.8%, p<0.001) was significantly lower than that in group C (46.2%). Conclusion Intravenous administration of nalbuphine 10 min before the end of adenotonsillectomy in children could decrease pain intensity and increase sedation levels during the recovery period with the reduction of remedial analgesia in the PACU. Trial registration number ChiCTR2200060118.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
38
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hirschsprung disease: common and uncommon variants. Role of genetics and the environment in the etiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Surgical management of the diaphragmatic defect in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a contemporary review. Lung-protective ventilation in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of pulmonary sequestration in children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1