肠袋-肛门吻合术治疗溃疡性结肠炎后大便失禁患者的肛肠压力测定:一项队列研究

IF 1.8 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Crohn's & Colitis 360 Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1093/crocol/otad063
Sigrid Young, Briton Lee, Scott Smukalla, Jordan Axelrad, Shannon Chang
{"title":"肠袋-肛门吻合术治疗溃疡性结肠炎后大便失禁患者的肛肠压力测定:一项队列研究","authors":"Sigrid Young, Briton Lee, Scott Smukalla, Jordan Axelrad, Shannon Chang","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otad063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Fecal incontinence commonly occurs in patients with ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. There is a paucity of manometric data in pouch patients. We aimed to better define manometric parameters in pouch patients with fecal incontinence. Methods We compared clinical and manometric variables in ulcerative colitis patients with pouch and fecal incontinence to ulcerative colitis patients with pouch without fecal incontinence and to non-ulcerative colitis patients with fecal incontinence. Manometric data for the three cohorts were compared to established normative data. An independent samples t-test was performed for continuous variables; chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of incontinence in pouch patients (p<0.05). Results Among 26 pouch patients with fecal incontinence (73% female), 26 pouch patients without fecal incontinence (35% female), and 84 patients with fecal incontinence without ulcerative colitis (68% female), there were no differences in anorectal pressures between patients with fecal incontinence. Lower pressures were observed in pouch patients with fecal incontinence compared to those without fecal incontinence. Resting pressure was similar between pouch patients with fecal incontinence and healthy controls (60.9±36.1mmHg vs. 66.9±3.2mmHg, p=0.40). Female sex (p=0.019) and defecatory disorders (p=0.033) each independently predicted fecal incontinence in pouch patients. Conclusions Pouch patients with fecal incontinence have lower anorectal pressures compared to pouch patients without incontinence, though have similar pressures to non-ulcerative colitis patients with fecal incontinence. Pouch patients with fecal incontinence have similar resting pressures as healthy controls. Distinct manometric normative values for pouch patients are needed.","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anorectal Manometry in Patients with Fecal Incontinence After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis: A Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Sigrid Young, Briton Lee, Scott Smukalla, Jordan Axelrad, Shannon Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/crocol/otad063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Fecal incontinence commonly occurs in patients with ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. There is a paucity of manometric data in pouch patients. We aimed to better define manometric parameters in pouch patients with fecal incontinence. Methods We compared clinical and manometric variables in ulcerative colitis patients with pouch and fecal incontinence to ulcerative colitis patients with pouch without fecal incontinence and to non-ulcerative colitis patients with fecal incontinence. Manometric data for the three cohorts were compared to established normative data. An independent samples t-test was performed for continuous variables; chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of incontinence in pouch patients (p<0.05). Results Among 26 pouch patients with fecal incontinence (73% female), 26 pouch patients without fecal incontinence (35% female), and 84 patients with fecal incontinence without ulcerative colitis (68% female), there were no differences in anorectal pressures between patients with fecal incontinence. Lower pressures were observed in pouch patients with fecal incontinence compared to those without fecal incontinence. Resting pressure was similar between pouch patients with fecal incontinence and healthy controls (60.9±36.1mmHg vs. 66.9±3.2mmHg, p=0.40). Female sex (p=0.019) and defecatory disorders (p=0.033) each independently predicted fecal incontinence in pouch patients. Conclusions Pouch patients with fecal incontinence have lower anorectal pressures compared to pouch patients without incontinence, though have similar pressures to non-ulcerative colitis patients with fecal incontinence. Pouch patients with fecal incontinence have similar resting pressures as healthy controls. Distinct manometric normative values for pouch patients are needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otad063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otad063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景溃疡性结肠炎和回肠袋-肛门吻合术患者常发生大便失禁。眼袋患者的血压测量数据缺乏。我们的目的是更好地定义袋尿失禁患者的压力测量参数。方法比较溃疡性结肠炎伴袋尿失禁患者、伴袋尿失禁溃疡性结肠炎伴袋尿失禁患者和伴袋尿失禁非溃疡性结肠炎伴袋尿失禁患者的临床和测压变量。将三个队列的测压数据与已建立的规范数据进行比较。对连续变量进行独立样本t检验;分类变量采用卡方检验。采用Logistic回归分析确定眼袋患者尿失禁的预测因素(p<0.05)。结果在26例大便失禁袋患者(女性占73%)、26例无大便失禁袋患者(女性占35%)和84例无溃疡性结肠炎的大便失禁患者(女性占68%)中,大便失禁患者的肛肠压力无差异。与无大便失禁的荷包患者相比,有大便失禁的荷包患者血压较低。袋尿失禁患者的静息压与健康对照组相似(60.9±36.1mmHg vs 66.9±3.2mmHg, p=0.40)。女性(p=0.019)和排便障碍(p=0.033)分别独立预测尿袋患者的大便失禁。结论:与非溃疡性结肠炎伴大便失禁的患者相比,袋装大便失禁患者的肛肠压力较低,但其肛肠压力与非溃疡性结肠炎伴大便失禁患者相似。袋尿失禁患者的静息压力与健康对照组相似。眼袋患者需要明确的测压标准值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anorectal Manometry in Patients with Fecal Incontinence After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis: A Cohort Study
Abstract Background Fecal incontinence commonly occurs in patients with ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. There is a paucity of manometric data in pouch patients. We aimed to better define manometric parameters in pouch patients with fecal incontinence. Methods We compared clinical and manometric variables in ulcerative colitis patients with pouch and fecal incontinence to ulcerative colitis patients with pouch without fecal incontinence and to non-ulcerative colitis patients with fecal incontinence. Manometric data for the three cohorts were compared to established normative data. An independent samples t-test was performed for continuous variables; chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of incontinence in pouch patients (p&lt;0.05). Results Among 26 pouch patients with fecal incontinence (73% female), 26 pouch patients without fecal incontinence (35% female), and 84 patients with fecal incontinence without ulcerative colitis (68% female), there were no differences in anorectal pressures between patients with fecal incontinence. Lower pressures were observed in pouch patients with fecal incontinence compared to those without fecal incontinence. Resting pressure was similar between pouch patients with fecal incontinence and healthy controls (60.9±36.1mmHg vs. 66.9±3.2mmHg, p=0.40). Female sex (p=0.019) and defecatory disorders (p=0.033) each independently predicted fecal incontinence in pouch patients. Conclusions Pouch patients with fecal incontinence have lower anorectal pressures compared to pouch patients without incontinence, though have similar pressures to non-ulcerative colitis patients with fecal incontinence. Pouch patients with fecal incontinence have similar resting pressures as healthy controls. Distinct manometric normative values for pouch patients are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crohn's & Colitis 360
Crohn's & Colitis 360 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Real-World Treatment Outcomes Associated With Early Versus Delayed Vedolizumab Initiation in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Like a Punch in the Gut: A Novel Perspective On Annual Recurrences of Ulcerative Colitis. Interventions for Adjunctive Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Permanent Ileostomy: A Systematic Review. Clinical Approach to STRIDE-II in Real-Life Settings: Analysis and Practical Recommendations. Evaluation of the Symptoms and Clinical Characteristics of Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis That Affect Healthcare Providers' Treatment Choices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1