壁运动评分指数和左心室射血分数作为急性心肌梗死后心血管事件的预测因子

R. Venkateshwaran, M. A. Arumugam
{"title":"壁运动评分指数和左心室射血分数作为急性心肌梗死后心血管事件的预测因子","authors":"R. Venkateshwaran, M. A. Arumugam","doi":"10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20233158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction serves as a vital gauge of left ventricular overall function and plays a crucial role in assessing the severity and prognosis of ischemic heart disease. Another approach for evaluating left ventricular function is through the assessment of regional function using the wall motion score index. In this study, our objective was to assess and compare the predictive value of both WMSI and LVEF in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction for their ability to predict all-cause mortality and readmission due to heart failure. Methods: This prospective study was conducted on admitted patients in Government Kilpauk Medical College on 70 patients with Acute myocardial infarction between the first 48 hours of symptoms and before hospital discharge. Follow-up with clinic visits was conducted 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality and readmission for heart failure. Results: 63% of patients had LVEF of less than 40%, and 55% had WMSI>1.5. After a follow-up of 1 year, 3.7% mortality and 11% readmission for heart failure were observed. WMSI>1.5 and LVEF<40% were associated with poor survival, while the WMSI proved to be a better predictor for rehospitalisation. 81% of STEMI group patients had EF<40%, but only 18% of the NSTEMI group had EF < 40%, which is statistically significant. There is no superiority between WMSI and LVEF in the STEMI and NSTEMI groups. Killip classification proved to be an independent predictor of mortality, but no statistical significance was observed in readmission. Conclusions: Both LVEF and WMSI were predictors of all-cause mortality, while the WMSI was a predictor for readmission for heart failure.","PeriodicalId":13827,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advances in Medicine","volume":"31 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wall motion score index and left ventricular ejection fraction as predictors of cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction\",\"authors\":\"R. Venkateshwaran, M. A. Arumugam\",\"doi\":\"10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20233158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction serves as a vital gauge of left ventricular overall function and plays a crucial role in assessing the severity and prognosis of ischemic heart disease. Another approach for evaluating left ventricular function is through the assessment of regional function using the wall motion score index. In this study, our objective was to assess and compare the predictive value of both WMSI and LVEF in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction for their ability to predict all-cause mortality and readmission due to heart failure. Methods: This prospective study was conducted on admitted patients in Government Kilpauk Medical College on 70 patients with Acute myocardial infarction between the first 48 hours of symptoms and before hospital discharge. Follow-up with clinic visits was conducted 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality and readmission for heart failure. Results: 63% of patients had LVEF of less than 40%, and 55% had WMSI>1.5. After a follow-up of 1 year, 3.7% mortality and 11% readmission for heart failure were observed. WMSI>1.5 and LVEF<40% were associated with poor survival, while the WMSI proved to be a better predictor for rehospitalisation. 81% of STEMI group patients had EF<40%, but only 18% of the NSTEMI group had EF < 40%, which is statistically significant. There is no superiority between WMSI and LVEF in the STEMI and NSTEMI groups. Killip classification proved to be an independent predictor of mortality, but no statistical significance was observed in readmission. Conclusions: Both LVEF and WMSI were predictors of all-cause mortality, while the WMSI was a predictor for readmission for heart failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advances in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advances in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20233158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advances in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20233158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:左室射血分数是衡量左室整体功能的重要指标,在评估缺血性心脏病的严重程度和预后方面起着至关重要的作用。另一种评估左心室功能的方法是通过使用壁运动评分指数评估局部功能。在这项研究中,我们的目的是评估和比较WMSI和LVEF对急性心肌梗死患者全因死亡率和心力衰竭再入院的预测价值。方法:对70例出现症状48小时至出院前住院的急性心肌梗死患者进行前瞻性研究。出院后3、6、12个月随访。主要终点是全因死亡率和心力衰竭再入院。结果:63%的患者LVEF小于40%,55%的患者wmsi为1.5。随访1年后,死亡率为3.7%,心力衰竭再入院率为11%。WMSI>1.5和LVEF<40%与生存率差相关,而WMSI被证明是再住院的更好预测指标。81%的STEMI组患者有EF<40%,但只有18%的NSTEMI组患者有EF<40%,这在统计上是显著的。在STEMI组和NSTEMI组中,WMSI和LVEF之间没有优势。Killip分类被证明是死亡率的独立预测因子,但在再入院方面没有统计学意义。结论:LVEF和WMSI都是全因死亡率的预测因子,而WMSI是心力衰竭再入院的预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wall motion score index and left ventricular ejection fraction as predictors of cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction
Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction serves as a vital gauge of left ventricular overall function and plays a crucial role in assessing the severity and prognosis of ischemic heart disease. Another approach for evaluating left ventricular function is through the assessment of regional function using the wall motion score index. In this study, our objective was to assess and compare the predictive value of both WMSI and LVEF in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction for their ability to predict all-cause mortality and readmission due to heart failure. Methods: This prospective study was conducted on admitted patients in Government Kilpauk Medical College on 70 patients with Acute myocardial infarction between the first 48 hours of symptoms and before hospital discharge. Follow-up with clinic visits was conducted 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality and readmission for heart failure. Results: 63% of patients had LVEF of less than 40%, and 55% had WMSI>1.5. After a follow-up of 1 year, 3.7% mortality and 11% readmission for heart failure were observed. WMSI>1.5 and LVEF<40% were associated with poor survival, while the WMSI proved to be a better predictor for rehospitalisation. 81% of STEMI group patients had EF<40%, but only 18% of the NSTEMI group had EF < 40%, which is statistically significant. There is no superiority between WMSI and LVEF in the STEMI and NSTEMI groups. Killip classification proved to be an independent predictor of mortality, but no statistical significance was observed in readmission. Conclusions: Both LVEF and WMSI were predictors of all-cause mortality, while the WMSI was a predictor for readmission for heart failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of gender on outcome of adult cardiac surgery Congenital absence of the appendix in a 21-year-old male with clinical presentation of acute appendicitis: a diagnostic challenge at Prince Ali Military Hospital Human immunodeficiency virus infected patient with decreased of consciousness, what do we think? Impact of body mass index on outcome of adult cardiac surgery Exploring the seasonal impact on appendectomy: incidence, patterns, predictors, and healthcare implication of appendectomy at Prince Ali military hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1