《智力评估:1860-1910年英国的成长小说和人类潜能政治》

IF 0.4 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS MODERN PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1086/727794
Aleksandar Stević
{"title":"《智力评估:1860-1910年英国的成长小说和人类潜能政治》","authors":"Aleksandar Stević","doi":"10.1086/727794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I am happy to report that I found no serious shortcomings in Assessing Intelligence, as the book skillfully and persuasively intertwines literary and intellectual history and approaches literary texts in a manner that is both incisive and generous: although it notes the many contradictions that pervade the treatment of intelligence in the novels of Eliot, Hardy, James, Wells, and Woolf, Assessing Intelligence has the virtue of not thinking itself cleverer than the texts it analyzes. Among its other virtues are the clarity of writing (which should make it accessible even to those not thoroughly acquainted with Victorian literary and intellectual history) and the quality of close readings: to invoke just one example, Lyons’s treatment of The Mill on the Floss should be thoroughly illuminating even to seasoned scholars of Eliot’s fiction.","PeriodicalId":45201,"journal":{"name":"MODERN PHILOLOGY","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\":<i>Assessing Intelligence: The Bildungsroman and the Politics of Human Potential in England, 1860–1910</i>\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandar Stević\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/727794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I am happy to report that I found no serious shortcomings in Assessing Intelligence, as the book skillfully and persuasively intertwines literary and intellectual history and approaches literary texts in a manner that is both incisive and generous: although it notes the many contradictions that pervade the treatment of intelligence in the novels of Eliot, Hardy, James, Wells, and Woolf, Assessing Intelligence has the virtue of not thinking itself cleverer than the texts it analyzes. Among its other virtues are the clarity of writing (which should make it accessible even to those not thoroughly acquainted with Victorian literary and intellectual history) and the quality of close readings: to invoke just one example, Lyons’s treatment of The Mill on the Floss should be thoroughly illuminating even to seasoned scholars of Eliot’s fiction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MODERN PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MODERN PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/727794\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/727794","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我很高兴地告诉大家,我没有发现《智力评估》的严重缺陷,因为这本书巧妙而有说服力地将文学史和思想史交织在一起,并以一种既深刻又慷慨的方式处理文学文本:尽管它注意到艾略特、哈代、詹姆斯、威尔斯和伍尔夫的小说中对智力的处理中充斥着许多矛盾,但《智力评估》的优点是,它并不认为自己比它分析的文本更聪明。它的其他优点包括文字清晰(即使是那些不完全熟悉维多利亚文学和思想史的人也能读懂)和精读的质量:仅举一个例子,里昂对弗洛斯河上的磨坊的处理,即使是对艾略特小说经验丰富的学者也应该有充分的启发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
:Assessing Intelligence: The Bildungsroman and the Politics of Human Potential in England, 1860–1910
I am happy to report that I found no serious shortcomings in Assessing Intelligence, as the book skillfully and persuasively intertwines literary and intellectual history and approaches literary texts in a manner that is both incisive and generous: although it notes the many contradictions that pervade the treatment of intelligence in the novels of Eliot, Hardy, James, Wells, and Woolf, Assessing Intelligence has the virtue of not thinking itself cleverer than the texts it analyzes. Among its other virtues are the clarity of writing (which should make it accessible even to those not thoroughly acquainted with Victorian literary and intellectual history) and the quality of close readings: to invoke just one example, Lyons’s treatment of The Mill on the Floss should be thoroughly illuminating even to seasoned scholars of Eliot’s fiction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MODERN PHILOLOGY
MODERN PHILOLOGY Multiple-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Founded in 1903, Modern Philology sets the standard for literary scholarship, history, and criticism. In addition to innovative and scholarly articles (in English) on literature in all modern world languages, MP also publishes insightful book reviews of recent books as well as review articles and research on archival documents. Editor Richard Strier is happy to announce that we now welcome contributions on literature in non-European languages and contributions that productively compare texts or traditions from European and non-European literatures. In general, we expect contributions to be written in (or translated into) English, and we expect quotations from non-English languages to be translated into English as well as reproduced in the original.
期刊最新文献
:Black Shakespeare: Reading and Misreading Race :Pain, Penance, and Protest: Peine Forte et Dure in Medieval England :The Politics of Speech in Later Twentieth-Century Poetry: Local Tongues in Heaney, Brooks, Harrison, and Clifton :Melville, Beauty, and American Literary Studies: An Aesthetics in All Things :Heroic Awe: The Sublime and the Remaking of Renaissance Epic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1