土著社区生存的一种(非)常见补救措施:重新审视传统知识共享

IF 3 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Journal of Human Rights and the Environment Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4337/jhre.2023.01.02
Christos Zois, Vassilis Pergantis
{"title":"土著社区生存的一种(非)常见补救措施:重新审视传统知识共享","authors":"Christos Zois, Vassilis Pergantis","doi":"10.4337/jhre.2023.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indigenous Traditional Knowledge (ITK) has been at the centre of heated debates about patent and intellectual protection for a long time. Efforts to normatively regulate the protection of ITK are imbued by a property-based logic associated most prominently with intellectual property regimes, which focus primarily on its economic value. However, such an approach collides with the spiritual, cultural and sacred character of Indigenous Traditional Knowledge. This article aims to provide an alternative for ITK protection through the revamping of the Traditional Knowledge Commons (TKC) concept. It elucidates those TKC traits beneficial to Indigenous communities and identifies potential challenges associated with TKC implementation. The article highlights instances of successfully enacted TKC as evidence of the economic and social capacity of such communitarian schemes, which can further empower Indigenous communities. Lastly, the article explores the viability of establishing a commons-alike ITK management regime on a global scale given the divergent views and aspirations both of communities providing ITK and potential ITK users.","PeriodicalId":43831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Rights and the Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An (un)common remedy to Indigenous communities’ subsistence: revisiting Traditional Knowledge Commons\",\"authors\":\"Christos Zois, Vassilis Pergantis\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/jhre.2023.01.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indigenous Traditional Knowledge (ITK) has been at the centre of heated debates about patent and intellectual protection for a long time. Efforts to normatively regulate the protection of ITK are imbued by a property-based logic associated most prominently with intellectual property regimes, which focus primarily on its economic value. However, such an approach collides with the spiritual, cultural and sacred character of Indigenous Traditional Knowledge. This article aims to provide an alternative for ITK protection through the revamping of the Traditional Knowledge Commons (TKC) concept. It elucidates those TKC traits beneficial to Indigenous communities and identifies potential challenges associated with TKC implementation. The article highlights instances of successfully enacted TKC as evidence of the economic and social capacity of such communitarian schemes, which can further empower Indigenous communities. Lastly, the article explores the viability of establishing a commons-alike ITK management regime on a global scale given the divergent views and aspirations both of communities providing ITK and potential ITK users.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Rights and the Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Rights and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2023.01.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Rights and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2023.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,土著传统知识(ITK)一直是有关专利和知识产权保护的激烈争论的焦点。规范管理信息技术知识产权保护的努力充满了一种以产权为基础的逻辑,这种逻辑最突出地与知识产权制度联系在一起,主要侧重于其经济价值。然而,这种做法与土著传统知识的精神、文化和神圣性相冲突。本文旨在通过改进传统知识共享(TKC)概念,为知识产权保护提供一种替代方案。它阐明了对土著社区有益的TKC特征,并确定了与TKC实施相关的潜在挑战。这篇文章强调了成功实施TKC的实例,作为这种社区主义计划的经济和社会能力的证据,它可以进一步赋予土著社区权力。最后,鉴于提供ITK的社区和潜在的ITK用户的不同观点和愿望,本文探讨了在全球范围内建立一个类似公共的ITK管理制度的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An (un)common remedy to Indigenous communities’ subsistence: revisiting Traditional Knowledge Commons
Indigenous Traditional Knowledge (ITK) has been at the centre of heated debates about patent and intellectual protection for a long time. Efforts to normatively regulate the protection of ITK are imbued by a property-based logic associated most prominently with intellectual property regimes, which focus primarily on its economic value. However, such an approach collides with the spiritual, cultural and sacred character of Indigenous Traditional Knowledge. This article aims to provide an alternative for ITK protection through the revamping of the Traditional Knowledge Commons (TKC) concept. It elucidates those TKC traits beneficial to Indigenous communities and identifies potential challenges associated with TKC implementation. The article highlights instances of successfully enacted TKC as evidence of the economic and social capacity of such communitarian schemes, which can further empower Indigenous communities. Lastly, the article explores the viability of establishing a commons-alike ITK management regime on a global scale given the divergent views and aspirations both of communities providing ITK and potential ITK users.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The relationship between human rights and the environment is fascinating, uneasy and increasingly urgent. This international journal provides a strategic academic forum for an extended interdisciplinary and multi-layered conversation that explores emergent possibilities, existing tensions, and multiple implications of entanglements between human and non-human forms of liveliness. We invite critical engagements on these themes, especially as refracted through human rights and environmental law, politics, policy-making and community level activisms.
期刊最新文献
Book review: Matthew C Canfield, Translating Food Sovereignty: Cultivating Justice in an Age of Transnational Governance (Stanford University Press, Stanford 2022) 264 pp. Book review: Rupert Read, Why Climate Breakdown Matters (Bloomsbury, London 2022) 232 pp. Constitutionalizing in the Anthropocene: an introduction Book review: Yoram Bauman and Grady Klein, The Cartoon Introduction to Climate Change, Revised Edition (Island Press, Washington DC 2022) 224 pp. Entanglements: the ambivalent role of law in the Anthropocene
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1