休克指数:易于使用,但它能预测重大腹部急诊手术后的结果吗?

IF 5.2 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2023291
Kai Siang Chan, Kok Yang Tan, Jerry Tiong Thye Goo
{"title":"休克指数:易于使用,但它能预测重大腹部急诊手术后的结果吗?","authors":"Kai Siang Chan, Kok Yang Tan, Jerry Tiong Thye Goo","doi":"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2023291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Major abdominal emergency surgery (MAES) is commonly performed for various potentially life-threatening intra-abdominal surgical conditions with high perioperative mortality of up to 45%.1 Certain patient factors (e.g. advanced age, frailty, and presence of multiple comorbidities) and disease factors (e.g. perforated viscus and intra-abdominal sepsis) have been shown to predict higher post-operative complications and mortality following MAES.2 Pre-operative risk stratification scores, such as the Portsmouth-Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (P-POSSUM) and National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) score, have also been developed to assist clinicians and/or surgeons in decision making and patient counselling. While these scoring systems have been widely studied and validated in patients of various demographics,3 they require input of multiple variables which may be cumbersome, especially in the emergency setting. Simple bedside scoring systems remain attractive for quick risk stratification and guidance of subsequent management.","PeriodicalId":50774,"journal":{"name":"Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shock index: Easy to use, but can it predict outcomes following major abdominal emergency surgery?\",\"authors\":\"Kai Siang Chan, Kok Yang Tan, Jerry Tiong Thye Goo\",\"doi\":\"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2023291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Major abdominal emergency surgery (MAES) is commonly performed for various potentially life-threatening intra-abdominal surgical conditions with high perioperative mortality of up to 45%.1 Certain patient factors (e.g. advanced age, frailty, and presence of multiple comorbidities) and disease factors (e.g. perforated viscus and intra-abdominal sepsis) have been shown to predict higher post-operative complications and mortality following MAES.2 Pre-operative risk stratification scores, such as the Portsmouth-Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (P-POSSUM) and National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) score, have also been developed to assist clinicians and/or surgeons in decision making and patient counselling. While these scoring systems have been widely studied and validated in patients of various demographics,3 they require input of multiple variables which may be cumbersome, especially in the emergency setting. Simple bedside scoring systems remain attractive for quick risk stratification and guidance of subsequent management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2023291\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2023291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腹部大急诊手术(MAES)通常用于各种可能危及生命的腹内手术,围手术期死亡率高达45% 1某些患者因素(如高龄、虚弱和存在多种合共病)和疾病因素(如内脏穿孔和腹腔内败血症)已被证明可以预测mas术后更高的并发症和死亡率。2术前风险分层评分,如死亡率和发病率计数的朴茨茅斯生理和手术严重程度评分(P-POSSUM)和国家紧急剖腹手术审计(NELA)评分。也已开发,以协助临床医生和/或外科医生在决策和患者咨询。虽然这些评分系统已经在不同人口统计数据的患者中得到了广泛的研究和验证,但它们需要输入多个变量,这可能很麻烦,特别是在紧急情况下。简单的床边评分系统对于快速风险分层和指导后续管理仍然具有吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shock index: Easy to use, but can it predict outcomes following major abdominal emergency surgery?
Major abdominal emergency surgery (MAES) is commonly performed for various potentially life-threatening intra-abdominal surgical conditions with high perioperative mortality of up to 45%.1 Certain patient factors (e.g. advanced age, frailty, and presence of multiple comorbidities) and disease factors (e.g. perforated viscus and intra-abdominal sepsis) have been shown to predict higher post-operative complications and mortality following MAES.2 Pre-operative risk stratification scores, such as the Portsmouth-Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (P-POSSUM) and National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) score, have also been developed to assist clinicians and/or surgeons in decision making and patient counselling. While these scoring systems have been widely studied and validated in patients of various demographics,3 they require input of multiple variables which may be cumbersome, especially in the emergency setting. Simple bedside scoring systems remain attractive for quick risk stratification and guidance of subsequent management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore
Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals is the official journal of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. Established in 1972, Annals is the leading medical journal in Singapore which aims to publish novel findings from clinical research as well as medical practices that can benefit the medical community.
期刊最新文献
Singapore’s Experience in Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Key Lessons from the Ground COVID-19: The virus, vaccine and paediatric heart Cardiovascular effects of COVID-19 in children Long COVID prevalence, risk factors and impact of vaccination in the paediatric population: a survey study in Singapore Association of quality-of-care indicators with asthma outcomes: An observational study for asthma care in Singapore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1