同种异体骨移植技术在前交叉韧带分期翻修手术中的应用

Søren Vindfeld, Line Lindanger, Eivind Inderhaug
{"title":"同种异体骨移植技术在前交叉韧带分期翻修手术中的应用","authors":"Søren Vindfeld, Line Lindanger, Eivind Inderhaug","doi":"10.1177/26350254231200038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tunnel widening, slightly malplaced former tunnels or bone loss due to hardware removal might prevent a 1-stage anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision procedure due to tunnel convergence or challenging graft fixation. A range of graft sources and bone grafting techniques are described—all with their strengths and limitations. Common autograft techniques come with substantial donor site morbidity that might hinder postoperative rehabilitation. Indications: Graft tunnel issues might prompt the need for structural grafts and a 2-stage ACL revision approach. The use of the current dowel allograft technique gives a flexible approach where 1 or several cylindrical grafts can be placed in prepared sockets for reliable bony ingrowth. Technique Description: Using femoral head allografts and cannulated coring reamers, multiple bone dowels (up to 6) can give a flexible and adaptable bone grafting situation. The intra-articular tunnels are dilated, and dowels are produced to allow a press-fit fixation that facilitates good bone healing. Removal of sclerotic bone and microfracture is key to allow optimal bone-to-bone healing. Use of cannulas inserted through the arthroscopic portals and tamps plug advancement will give a reliable graft deployment without dowel breakage. Results: The current authors have used this uniform technique for 119 patients since 2014. All cases displayed good bony healing at 5 months after surgery on computed tomography and radiographs, and 115 out of 119 went on to have a stage 2 revision ACL surgery at 6 months spacing from the bone grafting. The most common reason for not going through the second-stage revision was improvement of symptoms due to graft removal and bone grafting during the first surgery. Discussion/Conclusion: The current allograft dowel bone grafting allows for a flexible bone grafting in cases where a 1-step ACL revision procedure is not feasible. Reliable bony ingrowth is seen in the current cohort allowing the final step of ACL revision at 6 months spacing from bone grafting. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.","PeriodicalId":485913,"journal":{"name":"Video journal of sports medicine","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allogenous Bone Grafting Technique for Staged Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Søren Vindfeld, Line Lindanger, Eivind Inderhaug\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26350254231200038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Tunnel widening, slightly malplaced former tunnels or bone loss due to hardware removal might prevent a 1-stage anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision procedure due to tunnel convergence or challenging graft fixation. A range of graft sources and bone grafting techniques are described—all with their strengths and limitations. Common autograft techniques come with substantial donor site morbidity that might hinder postoperative rehabilitation. Indications: Graft tunnel issues might prompt the need for structural grafts and a 2-stage ACL revision approach. The use of the current dowel allograft technique gives a flexible approach where 1 or several cylindrical grafts can be placed in prepared sockets for reliable bony ingrowth. Technique Description: Using femoral head allografts and cannulated coring reamers, multiple bone dowels (up to 6) can give a flexible and adaptable bone grafting situation. The intra-articular tunnels are dilated, and dowels are produced to allow a press-fit fixation that facilitates good bone healing. Removal of sclerotic bone and microfracture is key to allow optimal bone-to-bone healing. Use of cannulas inserted through the arthroscopic portals and tamps plug advancement will give a reliable graft deployment without dowel breakage. Results: The current authors have used this uniform technique for 119 patients since 2014. All cases displayed good bony healing at 5 months after surgery on computed tomography and radiographs, and 115 out of 119 went on to have a stage 2 revision ACL surgery at 6 months spacing from the bone grafting. The most common reason for not going through the second-stage revision was improvement of symptoms due to graft removal and bone grafting during the first surgery. Discussion/Conclusion: The current allograft dowel bone grafting allows for a flexible bone grafting in cases where a 1-step ACL revision procedure is not feasible. Reliable bony ingrowth is seen in the current cohort allowing the final step of ACL revision at 6 months spacing from bone grafting. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":485913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Video journal of sports medicine\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Video journal of sports medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254231200038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video journal of sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254231200038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:隧道变宽、前隧道轻微错位或硬体移除导致的骨丢失可能会因隧道收敛或移植物固定困难而阻止一期前交叉韧带(ACL)翻修手术。一系列的移植物来源和骨移植技术被描述-所有与他们的优势和局限性。常见的自体移植物技术伴有大量的供区发病率,可能会阻碍术后康复。适应症:移植物隧道问题可能提示需要结构移植物和2阶段ACL翻修方法。目前使用的同种异体钉移植技术提供了一种灵活的方法,可以将1个或多个圆柱形移植物放置在准备好的骨槽中,以实现可靠的骨长入。技术描述:使用同种异体股骨头和空心取心铰刀,多个骨钉(最多6个)可以提供灵活和适应性强的植骨情况。扩张关节内隧道,并制造销钉,以便加压固定,促进良好的骨愈合。去除硬化骨和微骨折是实现最佳骨对骨愈合的关键。使用通过关节镜入口插入的套管和夯实塞推进将提供可靠的移植物部署,而不会破坏销钉。结果:自2014年以来,目前的作者已经对119例患者使用了这种统一的技术。所有病例在术后5个月的计算机断层扫描和x线片显示骨愈合良好,119例中有115例在植骨后6个月进行了2期ACL翻修手术。不进行第二阶段翻修的最常见原因是在第一次手术中由于移植物切除和植骨而症状改善。讨论/结论:目前的同种异体钉骨移植允许在一步前交叉韧带翻修手术不可行的情况下进行柔性骨移植。在当前队列中可以看到可靠的骨长入,允许在植骨间隔6个月时进行ACL翻修的最后一步。患者同意披露声明:作者证明已获得本出版物中出现的任何患者的同意。如果患者的身份是可识别的,作者必须在提交的文件中附上患者的免责声明或其他书面批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Allogenous Bone Grafting Technique for Staged Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery
Background: Tunnel widening, slightly malplaced former tunnels or bone loss due to hardware removal might prevent a 1-stage anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision procedure due to tunnel convergence or challenging graft fixation. A range of graft sources and bone grafting techniques are described—all with their strengths and limitations. Common autograft techniques come with substantial donor site morbidity that might hinder postoperative rehabilitation. Indications: Graft tunnel issues might prompt the need for structural grafts and a 2-stage ACL revision approach. The use of the current dowel allograft technique gives a flexible approach where 1 or several cylindrical grafts can be placed in prepared sockets for reliable bony ingrowth. Technique Description: Using femoral head allografts and cannulated coring reamers, multiple bone dowels (up to 6) can give a flexible and adaptable bone grafting situation. The intra-articular tunnels are dilated, and dowels are produced to allow a press-fit fixation that facilitates good bone healing. Removal of sclerotic bone and microfracture is key to allow optimal bone-to-bone healing. Use of cannulas inserted through the arthroscopic portals and tamps plug advancement will give a reliable graft deployment without dowel breakage. Results: The current authors have used this uniform technique for 119 patients since 2014. All cases displayed good bony healing at 5 months after surgery on computed tomography and radiographs, and 115 out of 119 went on to have a stage 2 revision ACL surgery at 6 months spacing from the bone grafting. The most common reason for not going through the second-stage revision was improvement of symptoms due to graft removal and bone grafting during the first surgery. Discussion/Conclusion: The current allograft dowel bone grafting allows for a flexible bone grafting in cases where a 1-step ACL revision procedure is not feasible. Reliable bony ingrowth is seen in the current cohort allowing the final step of ACL revision at 6 months spacing from bone grafting. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Arthroscopic Decompression of Calcific Tendinitis of the Shoulder and Repair of Residual Rotator Cuff Defect Open Approach for Repair of Tibial PCL Avulsion Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Restoration: Surgical Technique Fibrin Clot–Augmented Meniscal Repair Anterior Opening-Wedge Proximal Tibial Osteotomy for Slope Correction of Genu Recurvatum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1