利用合作伙伴关系保护美国少年司法系统中涉及的儿童的人权

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1353/cpr.2023.a907985
Melissa Coretz Goemann, Mikah Owen
{"title":"利用合作伙伴关系保护美国少年司法系统中涉及的儿童的人权","authors":"Melissa Coretz Goemann, Mikah Owen","doi":"10.1353/cpr.2023.a907985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leveraging Collaborative Partnerships to Protect the Human Rights of Children Involved in the United States' Juvenile Justice System Melissa Coretz Goemann, JD and Mikah Owen, MD, MPH, MBA Keywords Policy, youth justice, collaborative research, legislative advocacy, juvenile legal system, minimum age In 2019, United States' courts with juvenile justice jurisdiction handled more than 720,000 youth delinquency cases.1 Research demonstrates that children and adolescents involved with the legal system often have complex and unmet social, developmental, legal, medical, and mental health needs.2 Given the unique needs of justice-involved youth, it is imperative that the United States treat children in a developmentally appropriate way and promote and protect the human rights of justice-involved youth. The core elements of a justice system that would protect children's human rights are outlined in a series of international guidelines, laws, and treaties that establish minimum standards for treatment of children in conflict with the law. Unfortunately, when it comes to protecting the human rights of children involved with the justice system, the United States routinely fails to meet international standards. In this issue of Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research Education and Action, Drs. Elizabeth Barnert and Laura Abrams highlight one way in which the United States systematically fails to protect the human rights of children involved with the justice system. As described in their article, international standards and norms establish the minimum age of criminal responsibility at no younger than ages 12 to 14 years. Despite these international standards, the United States lacks federal protection from prosecution for children under 12 years of age. Furthermore, many U.S. states also lack a minimum age of criminal responsibility for children. The lack of federal and state protections can have devastating effects on children and families. Whether it is the arrest of a 6-year-old in Florida for throwing a temper tantrum in school3 or officers handcuffing and pepper spraying a 9-year-old in New York for a family disturbance call,4 news headlines and child narratives reveal the traumatic impact that arrest, prosecution, and incarceration can have on young children and their families. In addition to news headlines and firsthand accounts from children, scientific evidence confirms that courtrooms and detention facilities are no place for young children. Over the last two decades, advances in neuroscience and neuroimaging show the brain undergoes numerous structural and functional changes throughout childhood and the process of brain maturation is not complete until at least 26. Furthermore, research shows that the brain develops in stages, culminating in the maturation of the prefrontal cortex. The prefrontal cortex, sometimes referred to as the 'control center of the brain,' is the area of the brain responsible for a variety of executive functions, including decision making, impulse control and emotional regulation.5 [End Page 545] The developmental immaturity of the prefrontal cortex underscores that young children do not have the cognitive ability to fully understand the moral and legal implications of their actions and may lack the capacity or competency to stand trial.6 Numerous legal experts and social scientists have also expressed significant concerns about a young child's competency to understand and exercise their legal rights, to meaningfully participate in their own defense, or to understand what happens procedurally in court.7 Given their developmental immaturity, it is not surprising that involvement with the justice system can be detrimental to the well-being and developmental trajectory of young children. Research shows early contact with the juvenile justice system increases the likelihood of future system involvement … Detention at a young age is associated with poor adult health outcomes across physical and mental health domains. Juvenile justice involvement may also interrupt health development, serve as a traumatic experience for youth already at heightened risk for exposure to trauma, and subject young children to victimization and abuse.5 The United States' failure to shield young children from involvement with the justice system represents a systemic failure to protect the basic human rights of marginalized children within our society. This failure is exacerbated by the fact that Black, Brown, Indigenous, disabled, and LGBTQIA+ children have been disproportionately criminalized for decades with significant disparities at virtually every decision point...","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging Collaborative Partnerships to Protect the Human Rights of Children Involved in the United States' Juvenile Justice System\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Coretz Goemann, Mikah Owen\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cpr.2023.a907985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Leveraging Collaborative Partnerships to Protect the Human Rights of Children Involved in the United States' Juvenile Justice System Melissa Coretz Goemann, JD and Mikah Owen, MD, MPH, MBA Keywords Policy, youth justice, collaborative research, legislative advocacy, juvenile legal system, minimum age In 2019, United States' courts with juvenile justice jurisdiction handled more than 720,000 youth delinquency cases.1 Research demonstrates that children and adolescents involved with the legal system often have complex and unmet social, developmental, legal, medical, and mental health needs.2 Given the unique needs of justice-involved youth, it is imperative that the United States treat children in a developmentally appropriate way and promote and protect the human rights of justice-involved youth. The core elements of a justice system that would protect children's human rights are outlined in a series of international guidelines, laws, and treaties that establish minimum standards for treatment of children in conflict with the law. Unfortunately, when it comes to protecting the human rights of children involved with the justice system, the United States routinely fails to meet international standards. In this issue of Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research Education and Action, Drs. Elizabeth Barnert and Laura Abrams highlight one way in which the United States systematically fails to protect the human rights of children involved with the justice system. As described in their article, international standards and norms establish the minimum age of criminal responsibility at no younger than ages 12 to 14 years. Despite these international standards, the United States lacks federal protection from prosecution for children under 12 years of age. Furthermore, many U.S. states also lack a minimum age of criminal responsibility for children. The lack of federal and state protections can have devastating effects on children and families. Whether it is the arrest of a 6-year-old in Florida for throwing a temper tantrum in school3 or officers handcuffing and pepper spraying a 9-year-old in New York for a family disturbance call,4 news headlines and child narratives reveal the traumatic impact that arrest, prosecution, and incarceration can have on young children and their families. In addition to news headlines and firsthand accounts from children, scientific evidence confirms that courtrooms and detention facilities are no place for young children. Over the last two decades, advances in neuroscience and neuroimaging show the brain undergoes numerous structural and functional changes throughout childhood and the process of brain maturation is not complete until at least 26. Furthermore, research shows that the brain develops in stages, culminating in the maturation of the prefrontal cortex. The prefrontal cortex, sometimes referred to as the 'control center of the brain,' is the area of the brain responsible for a variety of executive functions, including decision making, impulse control and emotional regulation.5 [End Page 545] The developmental immaturity of the prefrontal cortex underscores that young children do not have the cognitive ability to fully understand the moral and legal implications of their actions and may lack the capacity or competency to stand trial.6 Numerous legal experts and social scientists have also expressed significant concerns about a young child's competency to understand and exercise their legal rights, to meaningfully participate in their own defense, or to understand what happens procedurally in court.7 Given their developmental immaturity, it is not surprising that involvement with the justice system can be detrimental to the well-being and developmental trajectory of young children. Research shows early contact with the juvenile justice system increases the likelihood of future system involvement … Detention at a young age is associated with poor adult health outcomes across physical and mental health domains. Juvenile justice involvement may also interrupt health development, serve as a traumatic experience for youth already at heightened risk for exposure to trauma, and subject young children to victimization and abuse.5 The United States' failure to shield young children from involvement with the justice system represents a systemic failure to protect the basic human rights of marginalized children within our society. This failure is exacerbated by the fact that Black, Brown, Indigenous, disabled, and LGBTQIA+ children have been disproportionately criminalized for decades with significant disparities at virtually every decision point...\",\"PeriodicalId\":46970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2023.a907985\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2023.a907985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关键词政策、青年司法、合作研究、立法倡导、少年法律制度、最低年龄2019年,美国少年司法管辖法院共审理青少年犯罪案件72万多起研究表明,涉及法律制度的儿童和青少年往往有复杂的、未得到满足的社会、发展、法律、医疗和心理健康需求鉴于参与司法的青年的独特需求,美国必须以一种适合发展的方式对待儿童,并促进和保护参与司法的青年的人权。保护儿童人权的司法系统的核心要素在一系列国际准则、法律和条约中得到概述,这些准则、法律和条约为处理触犯法律的儿童确立了最低标准。不幸的是,当涉及到保护涉及司法系统的儿童人权时,美国经常不能达到国际标准。在本期《社区卫生伙伴关系进展:研究、教育和行动》中,伊丽莎白·巴纳特和劳拉·艾布拉姆斯强调了美国在司法系统中系统性地未能保护儿童人权的一个方面。如其文章所述,国际标准和规范规定最低刑事责任年龄不得低于12至14岁。尽管有这些国际标准,但美国缺乏对12岁以下儿童免于起诉的联邦保护。此外,美国许多州也没有规定儿童承担刑事责任的最低年龄。缺乏联邦和州的保护可能会对儿童和家庭造成毁灭性的影响。无论是佛罗里达州一个6岁的孩子因为在学校里发脾气而被逮捕,还是纽约一个9岁的孩子因为家庭闹事而被警察戴上手铐并喷洒胡椒喷雾,新闻头条和孩子们的叙述都揭示了逮捕、起诉和监禁对年幼的孩子和他们的家庭造成的创伤性影响。除了新闻头条和儿童的第一手叙述外,科学证据证实,法庭和拘留设施不是儿童的地方。在过去的二十年里,神经科学和神经影像学的进步表明,大脑在整个童年时期经历了许多结构和功能的变化,大脑成熟的过程至少要到26岁才完成。此外,研究表明,大脑的发育是分阶段的,在前额皮质成熟时达到高潮。前额叶皮层有时被称为“大脑的控制中心”,是大脑中负责各种执行功能的区域,包括决策、冲动控制和情绪调节。前额叶皮层发育不成熟强调了幼儿没有完全理解其行为的道德和法律含义的认知能力,并且可能缺乏接受审判的能力或能力许多法律专家和社会科学家也对幼儿理解和行使其法律权利的能力、有意义地参与自己的辩护或理解法庭程序上发生的事情的能力表示了极大的关注鉴于他们的发育不成熟,参与司法系统可能对幼儿的福祉和发展轨迹有害,这并不奇怪。研究表明,与少年司法系统的早期接触增加了未来参与该系统的可能性……在年轻时被拘留与成年后身体和精神健康方面的不良健康结果有关。参与少年司法还可能中断健康发展,对已经面临较高创伤风险的青少年造成创伤经历,并使幼儿受到伤害和虐待美国未能保护幼儿免于卷入司法系统,这代表了在保护我们社会中边缘化儿童的基本人权方面的系统性失败。几十年来,黑人、棕色人种、土著、残疾人和LGBTQIA+儿童被不成比例地定罪,几乎在每个决策点都存在巨大差异,这一事实加剧了这种失败……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Leveraging Collaborative Partnerships to Protect the Human Rights of Children Involved in the United States' Juvenile Justice System
Leveraging Collaborative Partnerships to Protect the Human Rights of Children Involved in the United States' Juvenile Justice System Melissa Coretz Goemann, JD and Mikah Owen, MD, MPH, MBA Keywords Policy, youth justice, collaborative research, legislative advocacy, juvenile legal system, minimum age In 2019, United States' courts with juvenile justice jurisdiction handled more than 720,000 youth delinquency cases.1 Research demonstrates that children and adolescents involved with the legal system often have complex and unmet social, developmental, legal, medical, and mental health needs.2 Given the unique needs of justice-involved youth, it is imperative that the United States treat children in a developmentally appropriate way and promote and protect the human rights of justice-involved youth. The core elements of a justice system that would protect children's human rights are outlined in a series of international guidelines, laws, and treaties that establish minimum standards for treatment of children in conflict with the law. Unfortunately, when it comes to protecting the human rights of children involved with the justice system, the United States routinely fails to meet international standards. In this issue of Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research Education and Action, Drs. Elizabeth Barnert and Laura Abrams highlight one way in which the United States systematically fails to protect the human rights of children involved with the justice system. As described in their article, international standards and norms establish the minimum age of criminal responsibility at no younger than ages 12 to 14 years. Despite these international standards, the United States lacks federal protection from prosecution for children under 12 years of age. Furthermore, many U.S. states also lack a minimum age of criminal responsibility for children. The lack of federal and state protections can have devastating effects on children and families. Whether it is the arrest of a 6-year-old in Florida for throwing a temper tantrum in school3 or officers handcuffing and pepper spraying a 9-year-old in New York for a family disturbance call,4 news headlines and child narratives reveal the traumatic impact that arrest, prosecution, and incarceration can have on young children and their families. In addition to news headlines and firsthand accounts from children, scientific evidence confirms that courtrooms and detention facilities are no place for young children. Over the last two decades, advances in neuroscience and neuroimaging show the brain undergoes numerous structural and functional changes throughout childhood and the process of brain maturation is not complete until at least 26. Furthermore, research shows that the brain develops in stages, culminating in the maturation of the prefrontal cortex. The prefrontal cortex, sometimes referred to as the 'control center of the brain,' is the area of the brain responsible for a variety of executive functions, including decision making, impulse control and emotional regulation.5 [End Page 545] The developmental immaturity of the prefrontal cortex underscores that young children do not have the cognitive ability to fully understand the moral and legal implications of their actions and may lack the capacity or competency to stand trial.6 Numerous legal experts and social scientists have also expressed significant concerns about a young child's competency to understand and exercise their legal rights, to meaningfully participate in their own defense, or to understand what happens procedurally in court.7 Given their developmental immaturity, it is not surprising that involvement with the justice system can be detrimental to the well-being and developmental trajectory of young children. Research shows early contact with the juvenile justice system increases the likelihood of future system involvement … Detention at a young age is associated with poor adult health outcomes across physical and mental health domains. Juvenile justice involvement may also interrupt health development, serve as a traumatic experience for youth already at heightened risk for exposure to trauma, and subject young children to victimization and abuse.5 The United States' failure to shield young children from involvement with the justice system represents a systemic failure to protect the basic human rights of marginalized children within our society. This failure is exacerbated by the fact that Black, Brown, Indigenous, disabled, and LGBTQIA+ children have been disproportionately criminalized for decades with significant disparities at virtually every decision point...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊最新文献
Lessons from Two Latino Communities Working with Academic Partners to Increase Access to COVID-19 Testing. Infectious Disease Preparedness for Homeless Populations: Recommendations from a Community-Academic Partnership. Evaluating the Impact and Effectiveness of Flint's Community Ethics Review Board (CBOP-CERB): A Pilot Study. Bridging the Gap: Addressing Immigrant Health Through Community-initiated Screening Events. Engaging with Rural Communities for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Using Modified Boot Camp Translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1