{"title":"业绩记录:一个警世故事","authors":"Alice C.W. Huang","doi":"10.1086/728459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the literature on expert trust, it is often assumed that track records are the gold standard for evaluating expertise, and the di ffi culty of expert identification arises from either the lack of access to track records","PeriodicalId":55327,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","volume":"22 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Track Records: A Cautionary Tale\",\"authors\":\"Alice C.W. Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/728459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the literature on expert trust, it is often assumed that track records are the gold standard for evaluating expertise, and the di ffi culty of expert identification arises from either the lack of access to track records\",\"PeriodicalId\":55327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science\",\"volume\":\"22 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/728459\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/728459","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
In the literature on expert trust, it is often assumed that track records are the gold standard for evaluating expertise, and the di ffi culty of expert identification arises from either the lack of access to track records
期刊介绍：
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science encourages the application of philosophical techniques to issues raised by the natural and human sciences. These include general questions of scientific knowledge and objectivity, as well as more particular problems arising within specific disciplines.
Topics currently being discussed in the journal include: causation, the logic of natural selection, the interpretation of quantum mechanics, the direction of time, probability, confirmation, foundations of mathematics, supertasks and the theory of emotion.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
