“Keo”案的理论、临床、实践与个人思考

Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2023-01-17 DOI:10.55818/pcsp.v19i1.2130

Jerrold Lee Shapiro

{"title":"“Keo”案的理论、临床、实践与个人思考","authors":"Jerrold Lee Shapiro","doi":"10.55818/pcsp.v19i1.2130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I want to thank Arthur Bohart (2023) and Amy Curtis and Ronald Miller (2023) for each writing an excellent commentary on my existential, multicultural case study of \"Keo\" (Shapiro, 2023). In this response, I begin by discussing Bohart’s comments, which deal with more theoretical issues; and then I turn to the questions raised by Curtis and Miller, which address more clinical, practical, and personal issues.","PeriodicalId":53239,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy","volume":"361 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical, Clinical, Practical, and Personal Reflections on the Case of \\\"Keo\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Jerrold Lee Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.55818/pcsp.v19i1.2130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I want to thank Arthur Bohart (2023) and Amy Curtis and Ronald Miller (2023) for each writing an excellent commentary on my existential, multicultural case study of \\\"Keo\\\" (Shapiro, 2023). In this response, I begin by discussing Bohart’s comments, which deal with more theoretical issues; and then I turn to the questions raised by Curtis and Miller, which address more clinical, practical, and personal issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"361 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55818/pcsp.v19i1.2130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55818/pcsp.v19i1.2130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我要感谢亚瑟·博哈特(2023)、艾米·柯蒂斯和罗纳德·米勒(2023)，他们对我的存在主义、多元文化的“Keo”案例研究(夏皮罗，2023)都写了一篇精彩的评论。在这篇回应中，我将首先讨论博哈特的评论，这些评论涉及更多的理论问题;然后我转向柯蒂斯和米勒提出的问题，这些问题涉及更多的临床、实际和个人问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Theoretical, Clinical, Practical, and Personal Reflections on the Case of "Keo"

I want to thank Arthur Bohart (2023) and Amy Curtis and Ronald Miller (2023) for each writing an excellent commentary on my existential, multicultural case study of "Keo" (Shapiro, 2023). In this response, I begin by discussing Bohart’s comments, which deal with more theoretical issues; and then I turn to the questions raised by Curtis and Miller, which address more clinical, practical, and personal issues.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊