{"title":"弥散张量成像参数在脑膜炎患者中的应用:一项病例对照研究","authors":"Sargam Miglani, Shruti Chandak, Yogender ., Ankur Malhotra, Arjit Agarwal, Jigar Haria","doi":"10.7860/jcdr/2023/65460.18391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Neuroimaging plays an important role in the assessment of meningitis, but conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is insensitive for early and specific diagnosis. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) can illustrate disturbances in white matter integrity before they become obvious on conventional MRI. Aim: To determine DTI parameters, specifically Fractional Anisotropy (FA) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), in patients with meningitis and compare them with controls. Materials and Methods: This case-control study was conducted over a period of 18 months at Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre in Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. The study included a total of 61 clinically diagnosed meningitis patients, aged 18 years and above, who were referred to the Department of Radiodiagnosis for an MRI Brain. Additionally, 61 controls were included. Conventional MRI images were obtained followed by DTI. FA and ADC values were calculated by placing Regions Of Interest (ROI) at different levels for both groups. DTI parameters for different causative organisms (bacterial, viral, tubercular, and fungal) were compared. Data was analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 24.0, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test was used to identify significant differences. The p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: FA values were significantly lower in cases compared to controls at all levels in the brain (mean whole brain FA value of 0.30±0.036 in cases vs 0.43±0.030 in controls). ADC values were significantly higher in cases at the cerebellum, brainstem, and whole brain levels compared to controls (mean whole brain ADC value of 0.812±0.095 in cases vs 0.758±0.026 in controls) (p-value<0.05 considered statistically significant). These differences were evident in patients with clinically proven meningitis who had a normal appearance on conventional MRI, demonstrating the superiority of DTI over conventional MRI for the diagnosis of meningitis. Statistically significant differences were also found among different aetiological agents, highlighting the potential utility of DTI in the differential diagnosis of meningitis cases (mean whole brain FA of 0.31±0.038 in bacterial cases, 0.029±0.037 in viral cases, 0.299±0.034 in tubercular cases, and 0.27±0.00 in fungal cases vs. 0.43±0.030 in controls (p-value <0.01) and mean whole brain ADC values of 0.80±0.051 in bacterial, 0.85±0.14 in viral, 0.79±0.058 in tubercular, 1.03±0.00 in fungal cases vs. 0.758±0.026 in controls (p-value <0.01)). Conclusion: DTI is more sensitive than conventional MRI and is a useful early indicator of inflammatory process in patients with meningitis.","PeriodicalId":15483,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Patients with Meningitis: A Case-control Study\",\"authors\":\"Sargam Miglani, Shruti Chandak, Yogender ., Ankur Malhotra, Arjit Agarwal, Jigar Haria\",\"doi\":\"10.7860/jcdr/2023/65460.18391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Neuroimaging plays an important role in the assessment of meningitis, but conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is insensitive for early and specific diagnosis. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) can illustrate disturbances in white matter integrity before they become obvious on conventional MRI. Aim: To determine DTI parameters, specifically Fractional Anisotropy (FA) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), in patients with meningitis and compare them with controls. Materials and Methods: This case-control study was conducted over a period of 18 months at Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre in Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. The study included a total of 61 clinically diagnosed meningitis patients, aged 18 years and above, who were referred to the Department of Radiodiagnosis for an MRI Brain. Additionally, 61 controls were included. Conventional MRI images were obtained followed by DTI. FA and ADC values were calculated by placing Regions Of Interest (ROI) at different levels for both groups. DTI parameters for different causative organisms (bacterial, viral, tubercular, and fungal) were compared. Data was analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 24.0, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test was used to identify significant differences. The p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: FA values were significantly lower in cases compared to controls at all levels in the brain (mean whole brain FA value of 0.30±0.036 in cases vs 0.43±0.030 in controls). ADC values were significantly higher in cases at the cerebellum, brainstem, and whole brain levels compared to controls (mean whole brain ADC value of 0.812±0.095 in cases vs 0.758±0.026 in controls) (p-value<0.05 considered statistically significant). These differences were evident in patients with clinically proven meningitis who had a normal appearance on conventional MRI, demonstrating the superiority of DTI over conventional MRI for the diagnosis of meningitis. Statistically significant differences were also found among different aetiological agents, highlighting the potential utility of DTI in the differential diagnosis of meningitis cases (mean whole brain FA of 0.31±0.038 in bacterial cases, 0.029±0.037 in viral cases, 0.299±0.034 in tubercular cases, and 0.27±0.00 in fungal cases vs. 0.43±0.030 in controls (p-value <0.01) and mean whole brain ADC values of 0.80±0.051 in bacterial, 0.85±0.14 in viral, 0.79±0.058 in tubercular, 1.03±0.00 in fungal cases vs. 0.758±0.026 in controls (p-value <0.01)). Conclusion: DTI is more sensitive than conventional MRI and is a useful early indicator of inflammatory process in patients with meningitis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2023/65460.18391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2023/65460.18391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:神经影像学在评估脑膜炎中起着重要作用,但传统的磁共振成像(MRI)对早期和特异性诊断不敏感。弥散张量成像(Diffusion Tensor Imaging, DTI)可以在常规MRI显示白质完整性紊乱之前显示出来。目的:确定脑膜炎患者的DTI参数,特别是分数各向异性(FA)和表观扩散系数(ADC),并与对照组进行比较。材料和方法:本病例对照研究在印度北方邦莫拉达巴德的Teerthanker Mahaveer医学院和研究中心进行了为期18个月的研究。该研究包括61名临床诊断为脑膜炎的患者,年龄在18岁及以上,他们被转介到放射诊断部门进行MRI脑部检查。此外,还纳入了61名对照。常规MRI成像,DTI成像。通过将两组的感兴趣区域(ROI)置于不同的水平来计算FA和ADC值。比较不同病原菌(细菌、病毒、结核和真菌)的DTI参数。采用SPSS 24.0版社会科学统计软件包(Statistical Package for Social Sciences)对数据进行分析,采用方差分析(ANOVA)检验是否存在显著差异。p值<0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:与对照组相比,病例中脑内所有水平的FA值均显著降低(病例平均全脑FA值为0.30±0.036,对照组为0.43±0.030)。与对照组相比,小脑、脑干和全脑水平的ADC值显著升高(病例全脑ADC平均值为0.812±0.095,对照组为0.758±0.026)(p值0.05认为有统计学意义)。这些差异在临床证实的脑膜炎患者中很明显,这些患者在常规MRI上表现正常,表明DTI在诊断脑膜炎方面优于常规MRI。不同病因间的差异也有统计学意义,突出了DTI在脑膜炎病例鉴别诊断中的潜在应用价值(细菌性病例全脑平均FA为0.31±0.038,病毒性病例为0.029±0.037,结核病例为0.299±0.034,真菌病例为0.27±0.00,对照组为0.43±0.030 (p值<0.01);细菌性病例全脑平均ADC为0.80±0.051,病毒性病例为0.85±0.14,结核病例为0.79±0.058。真菌组为1.03±0.00,对照组为0.758±0.026 (p值<0.01)。结论:DTI比常规MRI更敏感,是脑膜炎患者炎症过程的一个有用的早期指标。
Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Patients with Meningitis: A Case-control Study
Introduction: Neuroimaging plays an important role in the assessment of meningitis, but conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is insensitive for early and specific diagnosis. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) can illustrate disturbances in white matter integrity before they become obvious on conventional MRI. Aim: To determine DTI parameters, specifically Fractional Anisotropy (FA) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), in patients with meningitis and compare them with controls. Materials and Methods: This case-control study was conducted over a period of 18 months at Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre in Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. The study included a total of 61 clinically diagnosed meningitis patients, aged 18 years and above, who were referred to the Department of Radiodiagnosis for an MRI Brain. Additionally, 61 controls were included. Conventional MRI images were obtained followed by DTI. FA and ADC values were calculated by placing Regions Of Interest (ROI) at different levels for both groups. DTI parameters for different causative organisms (bacterial, viral, tubercular, and fungal) were compared. Data was analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 24.0, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test was used to identify significant differences. The p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: FA values were significantly lower in cases compared to controls at all levels in the brain (mean whole brain FA value of 0.30±0.036 in cases vs 0.43±0.030 in controls). ADC values were significantly higher in cases at the cerebellum, brainstem, and whole brain levels compared to controls (mean whole brain ADC value of 0.812±0.095 in cases vs 0.758±0.026 in controls) (p-value<0.05 considered statistically significant). These differences were evident in patients with clinically proven meningitis who had a normal appearance on conventional MRI, demonstrating the superiority of DTI over conventional MRI for the diagnosis of meningitis. Statistically significant differences were also found among different aetiological agents, highlighting the potential utility of DTI in the differential diagnosis of meningitis cases (mean whole brain FA of 0.31±0.038 in bacterial cases, 0.029±0.037 in viral cases, 0.299±0.034 in tubercular cases, and 0.27±0.00 in fungal cases vs. 0.43±0.030 in controls (p-value <0.01) and mean whole brain ADC values of 0.80±0.051 in bacterial, 0.85±0.14 in viral, 0.79±0.058 in tubercular, 1.03±0.00 in fungal cases vs. 0.758±0.026 in controls (p-value <0.01)). Conclusion: DTI is more sensitive than conventional MRI and is a useful early indicator of inflammatory process in patients with meningitis.