交界性卵巢肿瘤:在三级中心二十年的经验

Fatih SAHİN, Erhan AKTÜRK, Osman Samet GÜNKAYA, Savaş ÖZDEMİR, Merve KONAL, Simten GENÇ, Arzu YURCİ, Ozgur AKBAYİR
{"title":"交界性卵巢肿瘤:在三级中心二十年的经验","authors":"Fatih SAHİN, Erhan AKTÜRK, Osman Samet GÜNKAYA, Savaş ÖZDEMİR, Merve KONAL, Simten GENÇ, Arzu YURCİ, Ozgur AKBAYİR","doi":"10.38053/acmj.1243317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To investigate whether there is a difference between serum tumor markers panel (CA 125, CA 19-9, CA 15-3, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)) and tumor size and histopathology in well-staged patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs). 
 Methods: Over the past 20 years (January 2001 to January 2021), the results of four tumor markers (CA 125, CA 19-9, CA 15-3, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)) have been clinically analyzed for for this retrospective cohort study of 156 patients who underwent surgery and were diagnosed with histopathology consistent with a borderline ovarian tumor.
 Results: The average age of patients with borderline ovarian tumors was determined to be 51.67 (4.726) years. Before the first surgery, high CA 125 levels (>35 U/l) were found in 53 patients (34%), high CEA levels (>4 ng/ml) were found in 24 patients (15.4%), high CA 19-9 levels (>37 U/ml) were found in 29 patients (18.6%), and high CA 15-3 (>30 ng/ml) levels were found in 12 patients (7.7%). The average CA 125 levels in tumors with serous histopathology [372.8 (1805.2)] were higher than those in tumors with mucinous histopathology (p=0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in tumor markers between tumors smaller than 8 cm and larger than 8 cm [(CA 125 p=0,257), (CEA p=0.9), (CA 19-9 p=0.295), (CA 15-3 p=0.404)].
 Conclusion: Our primary outcome of the study is an increase in CA 125 levels, which indicates serous histopathology. Our secondary outcome is the higher levels of tumor markers, but it does not suggest larger tumors.","PeriodicalId":307693,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Borderline ovarian tumors: twenty years of experience at a tertiary center\",\"authors\":\"Fatih SAHİN, Erhan AKTÜRK, Osman Samet GÜNKAYA, Savaş ÖZDEMİR, Merve KONAL, Simten GENÇ, Arzu YURCİ, Ozgur AKBAYİR\",\"doi\":\"10.38053/acmj.1243317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: To investigate whether there is a difference between serum tumor markers panel (CA 125, CA 19-9, CA 15-3, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)) and tumor size and histopathology in well-staged patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs). 
 Methods: Over the past 20 years (January 2001 to January 2021), the results of four tumor markers (CA 125, CA 19-9, CA 15-3, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)) have been clinically analyzed for for this retrospective cohort study of 156 patients who underwent surgery and were diagnosed with histopathology consistent with a borderline ovarian tumor.
 Results: The average age of patients with borderline ovarian tumors was determined to be 51.67 (4.726) years. Before the first surgery, high CA 125 levels (>35 U/l) were found in 53 patients (34%), high CEA levels (>4 ng/ml) were found in 24 patients (15.4%), high CA 19-9 levels (>37 U/ml) were found in 29 patients (18.6%), and high CA 15-3 (>30 ng/ml) levels were found in 12 patients (7.7%). The average CA 125 levels in tumors with serous histopathology [372.8 (1805.2)] were higher than those in tumors with mucinous histopathology (p=0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in tumor markers between tumors smaller than 8 cm and larger than 8 cm [(CA 125 p=0,257), (CEA p=0.9), (CA 19-9 p=0.295), (CA 15-3 p=0.404)].
 Conclusion: Our primary outcome of the study is an increase in CA 125 levels, which indicates serous histopathology. Our secondary outcome is the higher levels of tumor markers, but it does not suggest larger tumors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatolian Current Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatolian Current Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1243317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1243317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨分期良好的交界性卵巢肿瘤(BOTs)患者血清肿瘤标志物(ca125、ca19 -9、ca15 -3和癌胚抗原(CEA))、肿瘤大小和组织病理学的差异。& # x0D;方法:在过去的20年里(2001年1月至2021年1月),我们对156例接受手术并经组织病理学诊断为交界性卵巢肿瘤的患者进行了回顾性队列研究,对四种肿瘤标志物(CA 125、CA 19-9、CA 15-3和癌胚抗原(CEA))的结果进行了临床分析。结果:交界性卵巢肿瘤患者的平均年龄为51.67(4.726)岁。首次手术前,53例(34%)患者发现CA 125高水平(> 35u /l), 24例(15.4%)患者发现CEA高水平(> 4ng /ml), 29例(18.6%)患者发现CA 19-9高水平(> 37u /ml), 12例(7.7%)患者发现CA 15-3高水平(> 30ng /ml)。浆液型组织病理学肿瘤中CA 125的平均水平[372.8(1805.2)]高于黏液型组织病理学肿瘤(p=0.006)。小于8 cm与大于8 cm的肿瘤标志物比较,差异无统计学意义[(CA 125 p=0,257), (CEA p=0.9), (CA 19-9 p=0.295), (CA 15-3 p=0.404)]。 结论:我们研究的主要结果是CA 125水平升高,这表明严重的组织病理学。我们的次要结果是更高水平的肿瘤标志物,但这并不意味着更大的肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Borderline ovarian tumors: twenty years of experience at a tertiary center
Aims: To investigate whether there is a difference between serum tumor markers panel (CA 125, CA 19-9, CA 15-3, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)) and tumor size and histopathology in well-staged patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs). Methods: Over the past 20 years (January 2001 to January 2021), the results of four tumor markers (CA 125, CA 19-9, CA 15-3, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)) have been clinically analyzed for for this retrospective cohort study of 156 patients who underwent surgery and were diagnosed with histopathology consistent with a borderline ovarian tumor. Results: The average age of patients with borderline ovarian tumors was determined to be 51.67 (4.726) years. Before the first surgery, high CA 125 levels (>35 U/l) were found in 53 patients (34%), high CEA levels (>4 ng/ml) were found in 24 patients (15.4%), high CA 19-9 levels (>37 U/ml) were found in 29 patients (18.6%), and high CA 15-3 (>30 ng/ml) levels were found in 12 patients (7.7%). The average CA 125 levels in tumors with serous histopathology [372.8 (1805.2)] were higher than those in tumors with mucinous histopathology (p=0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in tumor markers between tumors smaller than 8 cm and larger than 8 cm [(CA 125 p=0,257), (CEA p=0.9), (CA 19-9 p=0.295), (CA 15-3 p=0.404)]. Conclusion: Our primary outcome of the study is an increase in CA 125 levels, which indicates serous histopathology. Our secondary outcome is the higher levels of tumor markers, but it does not suggest larger tumors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pan-immune inflammation value as a biomarker in ankylosing spondilitis and associated with disease activity ChatGPT in medical writing: enhancing healthcare communication through artificial intelligence and human expertise Temporal alterations in P-wave electrocardiographic metrics post patent foramen ovale closure: a retrospective study Asymptomatic COVID-19 and structural changes in the brain Exploring the nexus: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical correlations of urinary tract infections in diabetes mellitus patients - a comprehensive retrospective analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1