保罗、罗马和大象讨论的延伸

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION EXPOSITORY TIMES Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1177/00145246231202112
Alex W. Muir
{"title":"保罗、罗马和大象讨论的延伸","authors":"Alex W. Muir","doi":"10.1177/00145246231202112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"enables much of the later discussion about the Transfiguration as a participatory event), his use of the language of glory, his use of the phrase ‘behold two men’ at Luke 9.30 and Acts 1.10 (which may invite readers or hearers to link the Transfiguration with the Ascension, which only Luke narrates), as well as his description of the sleepiness of the disciples and his reference to Peter not knowing what he said. The sub-title of the book is important. It draws attention to its author’s interest in the difference between how people saw things in antiquity, and how they may see them today, and how these different ways of seeing (‘scopic regimes’) are themselves shaped by different understandings of vision. This theoretical framework approach proves fruitful, not least in the way in which it allows Anthony to delineate differences between modern historical-critical and patristic approaches to the Transfiguration. The latter, he notes, begin from what they perceive as the inherent strangeness of the story of the Transfiguration. The former, however, see these accounts as texts that invite readers and hearers who identify as disciples of Jesus to enter into and participate in the narrative and so find it transformative for themselves and for the Church. Anthony writes in full awareness of modern historical-critical approaches, and shows how attention to reception history can contribute to answering contemporary questions about how to understand the New Testament in is historical context, by learning from how it was understood by readers whose cultural world was much closer to that of the gospel writers than is ours today. He also demonstrates how contemporary readers who share their predecessors’ faith in God may gain insights into a wider understanding of the meaning and significance of the Transfiguration than answers to solely historical-critical or nontheological questions could ever reasonably be expected to give. His book is a useful contribution to the history of biblical interpretation and a valuable resource for those interested in the theological reading of Scripture.","PeriodicalId":43287,"journal":{"name":"EXPOSITORY TIMES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extending the Discussion on Paul, Rome, and Elephants\",\"authors\":\"Alex W. Muir\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00145246231202112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"enables much of the later discussion about the Transfiguration as a participatory event), his use of the language of glory, his use of the phrase ‘behold two men’ at Luke 9.30 and Acts 1.10 (which may invite readers or hearers to link the Transfiguration with the Ascension, which only Luke narrates), as well as his description of the sleepiness of the disciples and his reference to Peter not knowing what he said. The sub-title of the book is important. It draws attention to its author’s interest in the difference between how people saw things in antiquity, and how they may see them today, and how these different ways of seeing (‘scopic regimes’) are themselves shaped by different understandings of vision. This theoretical framework approach proves fruitful, not least in the way in which it allows Anthony to delineate differences between modern historical-critical and patristic approaches to the Transfiguration. The latter, he notes, begin from what they perceive as the inherent strangeness of the story of the Transfiguration. The former, however, see these accounts as texts that invite readers and hearers who identify as disciples of Jesus to enter into and participate in the narrative and so find it transformative for themselves and for the Church. Anthony writes in full awareness of modern historical-critical approaches, and shows how attention to reception history can contribute to answering contemporary questions about how to understand the New Testament in is historical context, by learning from how it was understood by readers whose cultural world was much closer to that of the gospel writers than is ours today. He also demonstrates how contemporary readers who share their predecessors’ faith in God may gain insights into a wider understanding of the meaning and significance of the Transfiguration than answers to solely historical-critical or nontheological questions could ever reasonably be expected to give. His book is a useful contribution to the history of biblical interpretation and a valuable resource for those interested in the theological reading of Scripture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EXPOSITORY TIMES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EXPOSITORY TIMES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00145246231202112\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EXPOSITORY TIMES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00145246231202112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extending the Discussion on Paul, Rome, and Elephants
enables much of the later discussion about the Transfiguration as a participatory event), his use of the language of glory, his use of the phrase ‘behold two men’ at Luke 9.30 and Acts 1.10 (which may invite readers or hearers to link the Transfiguration with the Ascension, which only Luke narrates), as well as his description of the sleepiness of the disciples and his reference to Peter not knowing what he said. The sub-title of the book is important. It draws attention to its author’s interest in the difference between how people saw things in antiquity, and how they may see them today, and how these different ways of seeing (‘scopic regimes’) are themselves shaped by different understandings of vision. This theoretical framework approach proves fruitful, not least in the way in which it allows Anthony to delineate differences between modern historical-critical and patristic approaches to the Transfiguration. The latter, he notes, begin from what they perceive as the inherent strangeness of the story of the Transfiguration. The former, however, see these accounts as texts that invite readers and hearers who identify as disciples of Jesus to enter into and participate in the narrative and so find it transformative for themselves and for the Church. Anthony writes in full awareness of modern historical-critical approaches, and shows how attention to reception history can contribute to answering contemporary questions about how to understand the New Testament in is historical context, by learning from how it was understood by readers whose cultural world was much closer to that of the gospel writers than is ours today. He also demonstrates how contemporary readers who share their predecessors’ faith in God may gain insights into a wider understanding of the meaning and significance of the Transfiguration than answers to solely historical-critical or nontheological questions could ever reasonably be expected to give. His book is a useful contribution to the history of biblical interpretation and a valuable resource for those interested in the theological reading of Scripture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EXPOSITORY TIMES
EXPOSITORY TIMES RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
223
期刊介绍: For over a century, the monthly Expository Times has distinguished itself from other periodicals by successfully combining an interest in all pastoral matters, practical and theoretical with the latest international biblical and theological scholarship. Each edition contains a central section which offers resources for the month for those conducting worship: a sermon by a preacher of distinction, exegetical notes and reports of group readings of the texts for the month, prayers and material for children"s worship. The Expository Times is an invaluable tool for disseminating scholarship relevant to the ministry, giving practical help to preachers, and maintaining a healthy interaction between theology and practice.
期刊最新文献
Christology, Ontology and Depictions of Divinity 10th December: 2nd Sunday of Advent: Isaiah 40.1–11; Psalm 85.1–2, 8–13; 2 Peter 3.8–15a; Mark 1.1–8 There Never Was a Plan B Thriving Amidst Challenges: Costly Grace Revisited Pastoral Virtues for Artificial Intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1