金枪鱼的组织环境和合作竞争网络成员的需求,以“stropy.pl”组织中的建筑公司为例

Artur Kisiołek, Marcin Gurtatowski
{"title":"金枪鱼的组织环境和合作竞争网络成员的需求,以“stropy.pl”组织中的建筑公司为例","authors":"Artur Kisiołek, Marcin Gurtatowski","doi":"10.29119/1641-3466.2023.178.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of the study is to find out the needs of co-opetition network members in the building material market, under the conditions of the TUNA organisational environment. Design/methodology/approach: In order to test the research hypotheses, an empirical research method was applied, involving a standardised interview questionnaire carried out using the CAPI technique among the companies associated in the “Stropy.pl” co-opetition network. The survey involved 53 respondents. Findings: Under the conditions of the TUNA organisational environment, there occurred differences in assessments of the economic situation in the building material market by the members of the coopetition network. Differences in assessments of the economic situation in the building material market have a moderate to large positive impact on the differentiation of needs of the members of the co-opetition network. Improving the quality of panel floors was more important for those who expected a moderate or high economic situation compared to those who were very or little optimistic. On the other hand, those who were very or little optimistic paid more attention to the clarity of communication, more frequent contact with the head office and new materials regarding the cooperation with “Stropy.pl”. In contrast, those who expected moderate or high economic situation were more appreciative of the improved sales availability of panel floors and the personalisation of fittings. Research limitations/implications: In order to obtain a more complete picture of the needs of the building material market in Poland, in the context of the TUNA organisational environment, it is recommended to conduct further research with the participation of end- users of these materials. Practical implications: The applicability of the study relates to the possibilities for company managers to use knowledge about the needs of members of a co-opetition network in the building material market, in the context of the TUNA organisational environment. Originality/value: The conclusions of the study made it possible to identify the correlation between the TUNA organisational environment, causing discrepancies in assessments of the economic situation in the building material market, and the needs of members of a co-opetition network. Conducting considerations in relation to the building material industry market further enhances the originality of the study. Keywords: co-opetition, organisational environment, TUNA, building material market. Category of the paper: research paper.","PeriodicalId":23940,"journal":{"name":"Zeszyty Naukowe KUL","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TUNA organisational environment and the needs of members of a co-opetition network, using the example of construction companies associated in the “stropy.pl” organisation\",\"authors\":\"Artur Kisiołek, Marcin Gurtatowski\",\"doi\":\"10.29119/1641-3466.2023.178.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The purpose of the study is to find out the needs of co-opetition network members in the building material market, under the conditions of the TUNA organisational environment. Design/methodology/approach: In order to test the research hypotheses, an empirical research method was applied, involving a standardised interview questionnaire carried out using the CAPI technique among the companies associated in the “Stropy.pl” co-opetition network. The survey involved 53 respondents. Findings: Under the conditions of the TUNA organisational environment, there occurred differences in assessments of the economic situation in the building material market by the members of the coopetition network. Differences in assessments of the economic situation in the building material market have a moderate to large positive impact on the differentiation of needs of the members of the co-opetition network. Improving the quality of panel floors was more important for those who expected a moderate or high economic situation compared to those who were very or little optimistic. On the other hand, those who were very or little optimistic paid more attention to the clarity of communication, more frequent contact with the head office and new materials regarding the cooperation with “Stropy.pl”. In contrast, those who expected moderate or high economic situation were more appreciative of the improved sales availability of panel floors and the personalisation of fittings. Research limitations/implications: In order to obtain a more complete picture of the needs of the building material market in Poland, in the context of the TUNA organisational environment, it is recommended to conduct further research with the participation of end- users of these materials. Practical implications: The applicability of the study relates to the possibilities for company managers to use knowledge about the needs of members of a co-opetition network in the building material market, in the context of the TUNA organisational environment. Originality/value: The conclusions of the study made it possible to identify the correlation between the TUNA organisational environment, causing discrepancies in assessments of the economic situation in the building material market, and the needs of members of a co-opetition network. Conducting considerations in relation to the building material industry market further enhances the originality of the study. Keywords: co-opetition, organisational environment, TUNA, building material market. Category of the paper: research paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeszyty Naukowe KUL\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeszyty Naukowe KUL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.178.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeszyty Naukowe KUL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.178.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究的目的是找出在金枪鱼组织环境条件下,建材市场中合作竞争网络成员的需求。设计/方法/方法:为了检验研究假设,采用了实证研究方法,包括在“Stropy.pl”合作竞争网络中的相关公司中使用CAPI技术进行标准化访谈问卷。该调查涉及53名受访者。研究发现:在金枪鱼组织环境条件下,合作网络成员对建材市场经济形势的评价存在差异。对建材市场经济状况评估的差异对合作竞争网络成员的需求差异有中等到较大的积极影响。与那些非常乐观或不太乐观的人相比,对于那些预期经济形势温和或良好的人来说,提高面板地板的质量更为重要。另一方面,对于与“Stropy.pl”的合作,非常乐观或不太乐观的人更关注沟通的清晰性、与总部的频繁接触以及新材料。相比之下,那些预期经济状况温和或良好的人更欣赏面板地板的销售改善和配件的个性化。研究限制/影响:为了更全面地了解波兰建筑材料市场的需求,在金枪鱼组织环境的背景下,建议在这些材料的最终用户的参与下进行进一步的研究。实际意义:该研究的适用性涉及公司经理在金枪鱼组织环境的背景下,在建材市场中使用有关合作竞争网络成员需求的知识的可能性。原创性/价值:这项研究的结论使人们能够确定金枪鱼的组织环境之间的相互关系,这在评估建筑材料市场的经济情况和合作竞争网络成员的需要方面造成了差异。对建材行业市场的考虑进一步增强了研究的原创性。关键词:合作竞争,组织环境,金枪鱼,建材市场。论文类别:研究论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TUNA organisational environment and the needs of members of a co-opetition network, using the example of construction companies associated in the “stropy.pl” organisation
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to find out the needs of co-opetition network members in the building material market, under the conditions of the TUNA organisational environment. Design/methodology/approach: In order to test the research hypotheses, an empirical research method was applied, involving a standardised interview questionnaire carried out using the CAPI technique among the companies associated in the “Stropy.pl” co-opetition network. The survey involved 53 respondents. Findings: Under the conditions of the TUNA organisational environment, there occurred differences in assessments of the economic situation in the building material market by the members of the coopetition network. Differences in assessments of the economic situation in the building material market have a moderate to large positive impact on the differentiation of needs of the members of the co-opetition network. Improving the quality of panel floors was more important for those who expected a moderate or high economic situation compared to those who were very or little optimistic. On the other hand, those who were very or little optimistic paid more attention to the clarity of communication, more frequent contact with the head office and new materials regarding the cooperation with “Stropy.pl”. In contrast, those who expected moderate or high economic situation were more appreciative of the improved sales availability of panel floors and the personalisation of fittings. Research limitations/implications: In order to obtain a more complete picture of the needs of the building material market in Poland, in the context of the TUNA organisational environment, it is recommended to conduct further research with the participation of end- users of these materials. Practical implications: The applicability of the study relates to the possibilities for company managers to use knowledge about the needs of members of a co-opetition network in the building material market, in the context of the TUNA organisational environment. Originality/value: The conclusions of the study made it possible to identify the correlation between the TUNA organisational environment, causing discrepancies in assessments of the economic situation in the building material market, and the needs of members of a co-opetition network. Conducting considerations in relation to the building material industry market further enhances the originality of the study. Keywords: co-opetition, organisational environment, TUNA, building material market. Category of the paper: research paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ZAR1 Resistosome RSV Fusion Glycoprotein Semaglutide Exenatide Liraglutide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1