评价各种非甾体抗炎药对绝经后骨性关节炎炎症型妇女的疗效和安全性

Q4 Medicine Meditsinskiy Sovet Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.21518/ms2023-281
I. A. Shafieva, S. V. Bulgakova, A. V. Shafieva, D. P. Kurmayev
{"title":"评价各种非甾体抗炎药对绝经后骨性关节炎炎症型妇女的疗效和安全性","authors":"I. A. Shafieva, S. V. Bulgakova, A. V. Shafieva, D. P. Kurmayev","doi":"10.21518/ms2023-281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction . Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are currently the mainstay of the management for relieving pain syndrome in osteoarthritis (OA). NSAIDs are characterized by an individual reaction to medication, as well as a quite high frequency of gastrointestinal side effects. The issue of the disadvantages and advantages of a particular group of NSAIDs is still open. Aim . To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Meloxicam at a dose of 15 mg/day as compared with Nimesulide and placebo in postmenopausal women with an inflammatory phenotype of OA. Results and discussion . The frequency of all adverse events was comparable among the group of patients receiving meloxicam (40.0%), and lower than in the nimesulide group (48.0%), but higher than in the placebo group. A decrease in pain syndrome was observed as early as at 2 weeks of treatment in the group of patients receiving meloxicam. A significant decrease in WOMAC scores (overall result, pain syndrome, stiffness, function) was observed in the group of patients receiving meloxicam, and in the group of patients receiving nimesulide, after 3 weeks of treatment. meloxicam and nimesulide demonstrated high efficacy at 3 weeks compared with the initial VAS scores. The placebo group showed no efficacy. Conclusion . The frequency of all adverse events was lower while taking meloxicam as compared to nimesulide. Our results substantiate the concept to prescribe meloxicam at a dose 15 mg once daily for the treatment of pain and stiffness in post-menopausal women with OA.","PeriodicalId":36137,"journal":{"name":"Meditsinskiy Sovet","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of various non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in postmenopausal women with an inflammatory phenotype of osteoarthritis\",\"authors\":\"I. A. Shafieva, S. V. Bulgakova, A. V. Shafieva, D. P. Kurmayev\",\"doi\":\"10.21518/ms2023-281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction . Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are currently the mainstay of the management for relieving pain syndrome in osteoarthritis (OA). NSAIDs are characterized by an individual reaction to medication, as well as a quite high frequency of gastrointestinal side effects. The issue of the disadvantages and advantages of a particular group of NSAIDs is still open. Aim . To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Meloxicam at a dose of 15 mg/day as compared with Nimesulide and placebo in postmenopausal women with an inflammatory phenotype of OA. Results and discussion . The frequency of all adverse events was comparable among the group of patients receiving meloxicam (40.0%), and lower than in the nimesulide group (48.0%), but higher than in the placebo group. A decrease in pain syndrome was observed as early as at 2 weeks of treatment in the group of patients receiving meloxicam. A significant decrease in WOMAC scores (overall result, pain syndrome, stiffness, function) was observed in the group of patients receiving meloxicam, and in the group of patients receiving nimesulide, after 3 weeks of treatment. meloxicam and nimesulide demonstrated high efficacy at 3 weeks compared with the initial VAS scores. The placebo group showed no efficacy. Conclusion . The frequency of all adverse events was lower while taking meloxicam as compared to nimesulide. Our results substantiate the concept to prescribe meloxicam at a dose 15 mg once daily for the treatment of pain and stiffness in post-menopausal women with OA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meditsinskiy Sovet\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meditsinskiy Sovet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2023-281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meditsinskiy Sovet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2023-281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)是目前治疗骨关节炎(OA)疼痛综合征的主要药物。非甾体抗炎药的特点是对药物的个体反应,以及相当高的胃肠道副作用。一组特定的非甾体抗炎药的利弊问题仍然是开放的。的目标。评估美洛昔康15mg /天的剂量与尼美舒利和安慰剂在绝经后骨性关节炎炎症型妇女中的安全性和有效性。结果和讨论。所有不良事件发生的频率在接受美洛昔康组(40.0%)的患者中是相当的,低于尼美舒利组(48.0%),但高于安慰剂组。在接受美洛昔康治疗的患者中,早在治疗2周时就观察到疼痛综合征的减轻。治疗3周后,美洛昔康组和尼美舒利组的WOMAC评分(总体结果、疼痛综合征、僵硬、功能)显著下降。与初始VAS评分相比,美洛昔康和尼美舒利在3周时显示出较高的疗效。安慰剂组无疗效。结论。与尼美舒利相比,服用美洛昔康的所有不良事件发生率均较低。我们的研究结果证实了处方美洛昔康的概念,剂量为15mg,每天一次,用于治疗绝经后OA妇女的疼痛和僵硬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of various non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in postmenopausal women with an inflammatory phenotype of osteoarthritis
Introduction . Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are currently the mainstay of the management for relieving pain syndrome in osteoarthritis (OA). NSAIDs are characterized by an individual reaction to medication, as well as a quite high frequency of gastrointestinal side effects. The issue of the disadvantages and advantages of a particular group of NSAIDs is still open. Aim . To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Meloxicam at a dose of 15 mg/day as compared with Nimesulide and placebo in postmenopausal women with an inflammatory phenotype of OA. Results and discussion . The frequency of all adverse events was comparable among the group of patients receiving meloxicam (40.0%), and lower than in the nimesulide group (48.0%), but higher than in the placebo group. A decrease in pain syndrome was observed as early as at 2 weeks of treatment in the group of patients receiving meloxicam. A significant decrease in WOMAC scores (overall result, pain syndrome, stiffness, function) was observed in the group of patients receiving meloxicam, and in the group of patients receiving nimesulide, after 3 weeks of treatment. meloxicam and nimesulide demonstrated high efficacy at 3 weeks compared with the initial VAS scores. The placebo group showed no efficacy. Conclusion . The frequency of all adverse events was lower while taking meloxicam as compared to nimesulide. Our results substantiate the concept to prescribe meloxicam at a dose 15 mg once daily for the treatment of pain and stiffness in post-menopausal women with OA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Meditsinskiy Sovet
Meditsinskiy Sovet Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
418
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Direct comparative study of the effectiveness of mepolizumab and dupilumab in patients with severe non-allergic eosinophilic asthma Possibilities of modern pharmacotherapy in patients with dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi Microscopic colitis of incomplete collagen type in combination with lactase deficiency Approaches to the management of surgical patients with antibiotic-associated mild diarrhea Irritable bowel syndrome: modern ideas about pathology and the possibility of its correction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1