纯度溢价效应:围绕纯度产品的不对称价值变化

IF 8.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Psychology & Marketing Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1002/mar.21937
Yi Li, Mario Pandelaere
{"title":"纯度溢价效应:围绕纯度产品的不对称价值变化","authors":"Yi Li, Mario Pandelaere","doi":"10.1002/mar.21937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research documents a purity premium effect, showing that consumers perceive a greater value difference between a pure product containing 100% of a single material (e.g., 100% wool) and a non‐pure product containing lower quality material (e.g., 80% wool + 20% cotton), compared to two non‐pure products with the same composition difference (e.g., 80% wool + 20% cotton vs. 60% wool + 40% cotton), suggesting a nonlinear value change. However, the value change is linear in the higher‐quality direction, suggesting an asymmetrical change in value distance around pure products. This effect happens because consumers use pure products to categorize products into different quality groups such that pure products belong to a different quality category from the lower quality non‐pure products, but to the same quality category as the higher quality non‐pure products. Based on this theorizing, the perceived quality difference between the pure and non‐pure products, which integrates both the objective material quality difference and the categorical difference, serves as the mechanism to drive the asymmetrical change of value around pure products. Five studies support this asymmetrical purity premium effect and the proposed process. The findings offer direct implications for pricing decisions around pure products. A price premium can be extracted when pricing a higher quality pure product compared to the non‐pure products. However, such a price premium does not apply when the pure product is of lower quality than the non‐pure products.","PeriodicalId":48373,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Marketing","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The purity premium effect: The asymmetrical value change around pure products\",\"authors\":\"Yi Li, Mario Pandelaere\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mar.21937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This research documents a purity premium effect, showing that consumers perceive a greater value difference between a pure product containing 100% of a single material (e.g., 100% wool) and a non‐pure product containing lower quality material (e.g., 80% wool + 20% cotton), compared to two non‐pure products with the same composition difference (e.g., 80% wool + 20% cotton vs. 60% wool + 40% cotton), suggesting a nonlinear value change. However, the value change is linear in the higher‐quality direction, suggesting an asymmetrical change in value distance around pure products. This effect happens because consumers use pure products to categorize products into different quality groups such that pure products belong to a different quality category from the lower quality non‐pure products, but to the same quality category as the higher quality non‐pure products. Based on this theorizing, the perceived quality difference between the pure and non‐pure products, which integrates both the objective material quality difference and the categorical difference, serves as the mechanism to drive the asymmetrical change of value around pure products. Five studies support this asymmetrical purity premium effect and the proposed process. The findings offer direct implications for pricing decisions around pure products. A price premium can be extracted when pricing a higher quality pure product compared to the non‐pure products. However, such a price premium does not apply when the pure product is of lower quality than the non‐pure products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology & Marketing\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology & Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21937\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21937","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究记录了纯度溢价效应,表明消费者认为含有100%单一材料的纯产品(例如100%羊毛)与含有较低质量材料的非纯产品(例如80%羊毛+ 20%棉花与60%羊毛+ 40%棉花)相比,具有相同成分差异的两种非纯产品(例如80%羊毛+ 20%棉花与60%羊毛+ 40%棉花)之间的价值差异更大,这表明价值变化是非线性的。然而,在高质量方向上,价值变化是线性的,这表明纯产品周围的价值距离变化是不对称的。这种效应的发生是因为消费者使用纯产品将产品分类为不同的质量组,这样纯产品与低质量的非纯产品属于不同的质量类别,但与高质量的非纯产品属于同一质量类别。基于这一理论,纯产品与非纯产品之间的感知质量差异是驱动纯产品周围价值不对称变化的机制,它集客观物质质量差异和范畴差异于一体。五项研究支持这种不对称纯度溢价效应和提议的过程。这些发现为纯产品的定价决策提供了直接的启示。与非纯产品相比,为高质量的纯产品定价时,可以提取价格溢价。然而,当纯产品的质量低于非纯产品时,这种溢价就不适用了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The purity premium effect: The asymmetrical value change around pure products
Abstract This research documents a purity premium effect, showing that consumers perceive a greater value difference between a pure product containing 100% of a single material (e.g., 100% wool) and a non‐pure product containing lower quality material (e.g., 80% wool + 20% cotton), compared to two non‐pure products with the same composition difference (e.g., 80% wool + 20% cotton vs. 60% wool + 40% cotton), suggesting a nonlinear value change. However, the value change is linear in the higher‐quality direction, suggesting an asymmetrical change in value distance around pure products. This effect happens because consumers use pure products to categorize products into different quality groups such that pure products belong to a different quality category from the lower quality non‐pure products, but to the same quality category as the higher quality non‐pure products. Based on this theorizing, the perceived quality difference between the pure and non‐pure products, which integrates both the objective material quality difference and the categorical difference, serves as the mechanism to drive the asymmetrical change of value around pure products. Five studies support this asymmetrical purity premium effect and the proposed process. The findings offer direct implications for pricing decisions around pure products. A price premium can be extracted when pricing a higher quality pure product compared to the non‐pure products. However, such a price premium does not apply when the pure product is of lower quality than the non‐pure products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
20.90%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Psychology & Marketing (P&M) publishes original research and review articles dealing with the application of psychological theories and techniques to marketing. As an interdisciplinary journal, P&M serves practitioners and academicians in the fields of psychology and marketing and is an appropriate outlet for articles designed to be of interest, concern, and applied value to its audience of scholars and professionals. Manuscripts that use psychological theory to better understand the various aspects of the marketing of products and services are appropriate for submission.
期刊最新文献
The bittersweet of consumer–human brand relationships in the social media context Eliminating customer experience pain points in complex customer journeys through smart service solutions The purity premium effect: The asymmetrical value change around pure products When “good enough” is not good enough: How maximizing benefits financial well‐being Beyond humans: Consumer reluctance to adopt zoonotic artificial intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1