Impact of digital positron emission tomography/computed tomography on the delineation of clinical target volume in advanced lung cancer

The present study investigated the differences between digital [18F]‑Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography [PET]/computed tomography [CT] (dPET/CT) and conventional PET/CT (cPET/CT) in delineating the clinical target volume (CTV) in patients with advanced lung cancer in the involved field radiation therapy (IFRT) era. Patients with advanced lung cancer were scanned using two dual‑imaging protocols (dPET/CT and cPET/CT). Two virtual delineations contoured with reference to dPET/CT and cPET/CT images were created for each patient by five radiation oncologists. Changes in the delineation of target volumes in each patient were examined. A total of 10 patients [male/female, 9/1; median age, 65 years (range, 58‑80 years)] were enrolled between April 2020 and September 2020. Significant changes in the delineation of CTVs were uncommon between dPET/CT and cPET/CT. A notable increase in CTVn was observed in 10% of the patients (1/10; P<0.05; Smirnov‑Grubbs analysis). In this patient, a node that was not assessed as lymph node metastasis when cPET/CT was used was assessed as lymph node metastasis when dPET/CT was used and was included in the CTVn by all five radiation oncologists. In patients with advanced lung cancer, notable changes in CTV delineations are uncommon, regardless of whether dPET/CT or cPET/CT is used. However, in some cases, CTVn delineation with reference to dPET/CT may improve the treatment outcomes of IFRT for advanced lung cancer.