一种治疗慢性ACL/MCL合并损伤的新算法:让我们回到“旋转不稳定性测试”

Nicolas Bouguennec, Thibault Marty-Diloy, Philippe Colombet, Nicolas Graveleau, James Robinson
{"title":"一种治疗慢性ACL/MCL合并损伤的新算法:让我们回到“旋转不稳定性测试”","authors":"Nicolas Bouguennec, Thibault Marty-Diloy, Philippe Colombet, Nicolas Graveleau, James Robinson","doi":"10.1177/26350254231204385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic combined medial collateral ligament (MCL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are frequent. Medial residual laxity is a risk factor for ACL rerupture. It should be treated at the same time as the ACL reconstruction (ACLR) if necessary, but there are still questions surrounding the indications for abstention or surgery of the medial plan, especially for grade 2 MCL injuries of the Fetto and Marshall classification. Indications: The purpose is to come back to a simple test, the “Rotatory Instability Test” as described by Slocum and Larson in 1968 for systematic clinical examination of the knee to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of the deep MCL (dMCL) and superficial MCL (sMCL) examination and to propose a decision-making algorithm for the treatment of the chronic combined ACL/MCL injuries based on the assessment of anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI). Technique Description: Examination of the ACL with Lachman test, anterior drawer in neutral rotation, and pivot shift test confirm the ACL injury. Valgus laxity is tested in extension and at 20° of flexion. Then, an anterior drawer test at 90° of flexion with external rotation is done (the anterior drawer in external rotation [ADER] test) allowing to identify isolated dMCL, dMCL + sMCL, or MCL + posterior oblique ligament (POL) injuries. Discussion: As persistent medial laxity is a risk factor for ACL graft failure and there is no reliable method of instrumented laxity assessment, careful clinical examination remains essential. Systematic examination of the medial side with valgus laxity testing at 0° and 20° flexion combined with the ADER test assessment of AMRI can guide treatment of the MCL injury component. Where there is no valgus laxity and the ADER test is negative, isolated ACLR is indicated. If there is significant medial laxity at 0°, this suggests combining sMCL and POL reconstruction with ACLR. Where the knee is stable at 0° but there is valgus laxity at 20° and a positive ADER test, the dMCL can be reconstructed using a gracilis graft or a combined sMCL and dMCL reconstruction can be added to the ACLR depending on the degree of laxity. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.","PeriodicalId":485913,"journal":{"name":"Video journal of sports medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Algorithm to Treat Chronic Combined ACL/MCL Injuries: Let's Come Back to the “Rotatory Instability Test”\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Bouguennec, Thibault Marty-Diloy, Philippe Colombet, Nicolas Graveleau, James Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26350254231204385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Chronic combined medial collateral ligament (MCL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are frequent. Medial residual laxity is a risk factor for ACL rerupture. It should be treated at the same time as the ACL reconstruction (ACLR) if necessary, but there are still questions surrounding the indications for abstention or surgery of the medial plan, especially for grade 2 MCL injuries of the Fetto and Marshall classification. Indications: The purpose is to come back to a simple test, the “Rotatory Instability Test” as described by Slocum and Larson in 1968 for systematic clinical examination of the knee to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of the deep MCL (dMCL) and superficial MCL (sMCL) examination and to propose a decision-making algorithm for the treatment of the chronic combined ACL/MCL injuries based on the assessment of anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI). Technique Description: Examination of the ACL with Lachman test, anterior drawer in neutral rotation, and pivot shift test confirm the ACL injury. Valgus laxity is tested in extension and at 20° of flexion. Then, an anterior drawer test at 90° of flexion with external rotation is done (the anterior drawer in external rotation [ADER] test) allowing to identify isolated dMCL, dMCL + sMCL, or MCL + posterior oblique ligament (POL) injuries. Discussion: As persistent medial laxity is a risk factor for ACL graft failure and there is no reliable method of instrumented laxity assessment, careful clinical examination remains essential. Systematic examination of the medial side with valgus laxity testing at 0° and 20° flexion combined with the ADER test assessment of AMRI can guide treatment of the MCL injury component. Where there is no valgus laxity and the ADER test is negative, isolated ACLR is indicated. If there is significant medial laxity at 0°, this suggests combining sMCL and POL reconstruction with ACLR. Where the knee is stable at 0° but there is valgus laxity at 20° and a positive ADER test, the dMCL can be reconstructed using a gracilis graft or a combined sMCL and dMCL reconstruction can be added to the ACLR depending on the degree of laxity. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":485913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Video journal of sports medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Video journal of sports medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254231204385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video journal of sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254231204385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性联合内侧副韧带(MCL)和前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤是常见的。内侧残余松弛是前交叉韧带再破裂的危险因素。如有必要,应与ACL重建(ACLR)同时进行治疗,但关于放弃或手术治疗的适应症仍然存在疑问,特别是对于Fetto和Marshall分级的2级MCL损伤。适应症:目的是回到Slocum和Larson在1968年描述的一种简单的试验,即“旋转不稳定性试验”,用于膝关节的系统临床检查,以提高深MCL (dMCL)和浅MCL (sMCL)检查的敏感性和准确性,并提出一种基于前medial rotation Instability (AMRI)评估的慢性合并ACL/MCL损伤的治疗决策算法。技术描述:通过Lachman试验、前抽屉中立旋转和枢轴移位试验检查前交叉韧带,确认前交叉韧带损伤。外翻松弛度在伸展和20°屈曲时进行测试。然后,在屈曲90°并外旋时进行前抽屉试验(外旋前抽屉[ADER]试验),以确定孤立性dMCL、dMCL + sMCL或MCL +后斜韧带(POL)损伤。讨论:由于持续的内侧松弛是前交叉韧带移植失败的危险因素,并且没有可靠的方法来评估松弛程度,仔细的临床检查仍然是必要的。系统检查内侧,在0°和20°屈曲时进行外翻松弛测试,并结合AMRI的ADER测试评估,可以指导MCL损伤部件的治疗。如果没有外翻松弛,ADER试验阴性,则提示孤立ACLR。如果在0°处有明显的内侧松弛,则建议将sMCL和POL重建与ACLR联合使用。如果膝关节在0°处稳定,但在20°处存在外翻松弛,并且ADER测试呈阳性,则可以使用薄板移植物重建dMCL,或者根据松弛程度将sMCL和dMCL联合重建添加到ACLR中。患者同意披露声明:作者证明已获得本出版物中出现的任何患者的同意。如果患者的身份是可识别的,作者必须在提交的文件中附上患者的免责声明或其他书面批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A New Algorithm to Treat Chronic Combined ACL/MCL Injuries: Let's Come Back to the “Rotatory Instability Test”
Background: Chronic combined medial collateral ligament (MCL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are frequent. Medial residual laxity is a risk factor for ACL rerupture. It should be treated at the same time as the ACL reconstruction (ACLR) if necessary, but there are still questions surrounding the indications for abstention or surgery of the medial plan, especially for grade 2 MCL injuries of the Fetto and Marshall classification. Indications: The purpose is to come back to a simple test, the “Rotatory Instability Test” as described by Slocum and Larson in 1968 for systematic clinical examination of the knee to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of the deep MCL (dMCL) and superficial MCL (sMCL) examination and to propose a decision-making algorithm for the treatment of the chronic combined ACL/MCL injuries based on the assessment of anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI). Technique Description: Examination of the ACL with Lachman test, anterior drawer in neutral rotation, and pivot shift test confirm the ACL injury. Valgus laxity is tested in extension and at 20° of flexion. Then, an anterior drawer test at 90° of flexion with external rotation is done (the anterior drawer in external rotation [ADER] test) allowing to identify isolated dMCL, dMCL + sMCL, or MCL + posterior oblique ligament (POL) injuries. Discussion: As persistent medial laxity is a risk factor for ACL graft failure and there is no reliable method of instrumented laxity assessment, careful clinical examination remains essential. Systematic examination of the medial side with valgus laxity testing at 0° and 20° flexion combined with the ADER test assessment of AMRI can guide treatment of the MCL injury component. Where there is no valgus laxity and the ADER test is negative, isolated ACLR is indicated. If there is significant medial laxity at 0°, this suggests combining sMCL and POL reconstruction with ACLR. Where the knee is stable at 0° but there is valgus laxity at 20° and a positive ADER test, the dMCL can be reconstructed using a gracilis graft or a combined sMCL and dMCL reconstruction can be added to the ACLR depending on the degree of laxity. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Arthroscopic Decompression of Calcific Tendinitis of the Shoulder and Repair of Residual Rotator Cuff Defect Open Approach for Repair of Tibial PCL Avulsion Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Restoration: Surgical Technique Fibrin Clot–Augmented Meniscal Repair Anterior Opening-Wedge Proximal Tibial Osteotomy for Slope Correction of Genu Recurvatum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1