智慧城市——个人重要吗?

IF 4.6 3区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Journal of Urban Technology Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1080/10630732.2023.2194844
Sandra Breux, Jérémy Diaz, Hugo Loiseau
{"title":"智慧城市——个人重要吗?","authors":"Sandra Breux, Jérémy Diaz, Hugo Loiseau","doi":"10.1080/10630732.2023.2194844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTEarly smart city projects tended to be technology-driven, conceiving of the citizen as a data provider. New citizen-centered projects have emerged that challenge the role of the individual in these second-generation smart cities. While some works describe the political role that individuals play in these cities, they only indirectly address the place of technology in determining the participation of the individual in these projects. In this article, we draw on the work done on another technical system—cyberspace—to address the relationship between individuals and technology in the smart city and its consequences. Adapting a typology initially developed for cyberspace and using examples of the City of Montréal, we identify three potential categories of the individual’s role within the smart city: (1) Active role (involved individual), (2) Passive role (synchronized individual), and (3) Victim (disadvantaged individual). We show that the individual is a misinformed figure, despite attempts to focus smart development on citizens. Moreover, we posit that the individual cannot have a real political role as long as the political vision of the city does not precede the technical dimension.KEYWORDS: smart cityindividual’s rolecyberspace Notes1 Our goal is not to criticize the Montreal experience or its genealogy but rather to use this experience as an illustration and springboard for our reflection. Furthermore, our analysis of Montreal stops after the Smart City Challenge is awarded in Citation2019. Starting in 2019, a new step—funded by the award of the Smart City Challenge—has begun: Montréal en commun, a program structured around three components (mobilities, food, and data) involving a large community of actors, most of which are NPOs or university laboratories.2 When we refer to a document in French, we write Montréal in its French form. When we refer to Montreal in the English text, we write Montreal in English.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSandra BreuxSandra Breux is a professor at the Institut National de Recherche Scientifique, Centre Urbanisation Culture et Société, Montréal, Québec, H2X 1E3, Canada.Jérémy DiazJérémy Diaz was previously a PhD student at the Université du Québec à Montréal, Département d’Études Urbaines et Touristiques, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3P8, Canada.Hugo LoiseauHugo Loiseau is Professeur titulaire, École de politique appliquée, Faculté des lettres et sciences humaines, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1K 2R1, Canada.","PeriodicalId":47593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Smart City – Does the Individual Matter?\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Breux, Jérémy Diaz, Hugo Loiseau\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10630732.2023.2194844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTEarly smart city projects tended to be technology-driven, conceiving of the citizen as a data provider. New citizen-centered projects have emerged that challenge the role of the individual in these second-generation smart cities. While some works describe the political role that individuals play in these cities, they only indirectly address the place of technology in determining the participation of the individual in these projects. In this article, we draw on the work done on another technical system—cyberspace—to address the relationship between individuals and technology in the smart city and its consequences. Adapting a typology initially developed for cyberspace and using examples of the City of Montréal, we identify three potential categories of the individual’s role within the smart city: (1) Active role (involved individual), (2) Passive role (synchronized individual), and (3) Victim (disadvantaged individual). We show that the individual is a misinformed figure, despite attempts to focus smart development on citizens. Moreover, we posit that the individual cannot have a real political role as long as the political vision of the city does not precede the technical dimension.KEYWORDS: smart cityindividual’s rolecyberspace Notes1 Our goal is not to criticize the Montreal experience or its genealogy but rather to use this experience as an illustration and springboard for our reflection. Furthermore, our analysis of Montreal stops after the Smart City Challenge is awarded in Citation2019. Starting in 2019, a new step—funded by the award of the Smart City Challenge—has begun: Montréal en commun, a program structured around three components (mobilities, food, and data) involving a large community of actors, most of which are NPOs or university laboratories.2 When we refer to a document in French, we write Montréal in its French form. When we refer to Montreal in the English text, we write Montreal in English.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSandra BreuxSandra Breux is a professor at the Institut National de Recherche Scientifique, Centre Urbanisation Culture et Société, Montréal, Québec, H2X 1E3, Canada.Jérémy DiazJérémy Diaz was previously a PhD student at the Université du Québec à Montréal, Département d’Études Urbaines et Touristiques, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3P8, Canada.Hugo LoiseauHugo Loiseau is Professeur titulaire, École de politique appliquée, Faculté des lettres et sciences humaines, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1K 2R1, Canada.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2023.2194844\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2023.2194844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

早期的智慧城市项目往往是技术驱动的,将市民视为数据提供者。新的以公民为中心的项目已经出现,挑战了个人在这些第二代智慧城市中的作用。虽然有些作品描述了个人在这些城市中扮演的政治角色,但它们只是间接地解决了技术在决定个人参与这些项目中的地位。在本文中,我们借鉴了在另一个技术系统——网络空间上所做的工作,以解决智慧城市中个人与技术之间的关系及其后果。采用最初为网络空间开发的类型学,并以montracimal市为例,我们确定了智慧城市中个人角色的三种潜在类别:(1)主动角色(参与个人),(2)被动角色(同步个人),(3)受害者(弱势个人)。我们表明,尽管试图将智慧发展的重点放在公民身上,但个人是一个被误导的人物。此外,我们认为,只要城市的政治愿景没有先于技术层面,个人就不可能发挥真正的政治作用。注1我们的目的不是批评蒙特利尔的经验或其谱系,而是利用这一经验作为我们反思的例证和跳板。此外,我们对蒙特利尔的分析在Citation2019颁发智慧城市挑战赛之后就停止了。从2019年开始,由智慧城市挑战赛(Smart City challenge)奖项资助的一个新步骤已经开始:montrsamal en commons,这是一个围绕三个组成部分(移动性、食物和数据)构建的项目,涉及大量参与者,其中大多数是非营利组织或大学实验室当我们用法语提到一份文件时,我们用法文的montracimal。当我们在英语文本中提到蒙特利尔时,我们用英语写蒙特利尔。作者简介:sandra Breux,加拿大H2X 1E3,城市化、文化和社会中心国家科学研究所教授。贾姆·贾姆·迪亚兹以前是加拿大蒙特利尔大学的一名博士生,他曾就读于加拿大蒙特利尔大学。雨果·卢瓦索,加拿大舍布鲁克大学人文科学与文学学院,舍布鲁克,舍姆萨,j1k2r1,加拿大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Smart City – Does the Individual Matter?
ABSTRACTEarly smart city projects tended to be technology-driven, conceiving of the citizen as a data provider. New citizen-centered projects have emerged that challenge the role of the individual in these second-generation smart cities. While some works describe the political role that individuals play in these cities, they only indirectly address the place of technology in determining the participation of the individual in these projects. In this article, we draw on the work done on another technical system—cyberspace—to address the relationship between individuals and technology in the smart city and its consequences. Adapting a typology initially developed for cyberspace and using examples of the City of Montréal, we identify three potential categories of the individual’s role within the smart city: (1) Active role (involved individual), (2) Passive role (synchronized individual), and (3) Victim (disadvantaged individual). We show that the individual is a misinformed figure, despite attempts to focus smart development on citizens. Moreover, we posit that the individual cannot have a real political role as long as the political vision of the city does not precede the technical dimension.KEYWORDS: smart cityindividual’s rolecyberspace Notes1 Our goal is not to criticize the Montreal experience or its genealogy but rather to use this experience as an illustration and springboard for our reflection. Furthermore, our analysis of Montreal stops after the Smart City Challenge is awarded in Citation2019. Starting in 2019, a new step—funded by the award of the Smart City Challenge—has begun: Montréal en commun, a program structured around three components (mobilities, food, and data) involving a large community of actors, most of which are NPOs or university laboratories.2 When we refer to a document in French, we write Montréal in its French form. When we refer to Montreal in the English text, we write Montreal in English.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSandra BreuxSandra Breux is a professor at the Institut National de Recherche Scientifique, Centre Urbanisation Culture et Société, Montréal, Québec, H2X 1E3, Canada.Jérémy DiazJérémy Diaz was previously a PhD student at the Université du Québec à Montréal, Département d’Études Urbaines et Touristiques, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3P8, Canada.Hugo LoiseauHugo Loiseau is Professeur titulaire, École de politique appliquée, Faculté des lettres et sciences humaines, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1K 2R1, Canada.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Journal of Urban Technology publishes articles that review and analyze developments in urban technologies as well as articles that study the history and the political, economic, environmental, social, esthetic, and ethical effects of those technologies. The goal of the journal is, through education and discussion, to maximize the positive and minimize the adverse effects of technology on cities. The journal"s mission is to open a conversation between specialists and non-specialists (or among practitioners of different specialities) and is designed for both scholars and a general audience whose businesses, occupations, professions, or studies require that they become aware of the effects of new technologies on urban environments.
期刊最新文献
Tweeting during the Pandemic in New York City: Unveiling the Evolving Sentiment Landscape of NYC through a Spatiotemporal Analysis of Geolocated Tweets Can Smart Cities Be Sustainable? An Emerging Field of Research Informational Modeling of Cities: Method and Challenges for Institutional Implementation Investigating Digitally Inflected Intercity Cycle Commuting The Role of Digital Management and Smart Technologies for Sports Education in a Dynamic Environment: Employment, Green Growth, and Tourism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1