Khanh Bui, Maurizio Tomaiolo, Kaylene Carter, Codrin Iacob, Vamsee Neerukonda, Anna Stagner, Zaynab Sajjadi, Katherine V. Escobar, Paula Ordoñez Armijos, Ralph C. Eagle, Sonia Mehta, James P. Dunn, Leslie Hyman, Tatyana Milman
{"title":"眼球摘除或内脏切除患者的交感性眼炎:病理实验室和IRIS®注册经验","authors":"Khanh Bui, Maurizio Tomaiolo, Kaylene Carter, Codrin Iacob, Vamsee Neerukonda, Anna Stagner, Zaynab Sajjadi, Katherine V. Escobar, Paula Ordoñez Armijos, Ralph C. Eagle, Sonia Mehta, James P. Dunn, Leslie Hyman, Tatyana Milman","doi":"10.1159/000533310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) is a rare bilateral granulomatous panuveitis that can follow surgical or non-surgical ocular trauma in one eye. Because its diagnosis requires clinical-pathologic correlation, the true incidence of SO is unknown, and there is a need to understand the recent trends in risk factors and frequency of this condition. Methods: Pathology records of all enucleated or eviscerated (ENEV) eyes at three pathology laboratories were reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, procedure indication, pathology diagnosis, and clinical history of trauma and uveitis. IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) was searched for all patients with SO, acquired absence of eye (AAE), and/or ENEV. Data obtained included patient demographics, ocular procedures, and preoperative diagnoses within 30 days of AAE/ENEV. Results: In the pathology laboratory setting, the incidence of SO over a 36-year period in patients who underwent ENEV was 0.2% (20/9,092); the 5-year incidence ranged from 0.0-0.3%. Among the 20 eyes with SO, the inciting event was surgical trauma in 50% (10/20), non-surgical trauma in 45% (9/20), and missing/undetermined in 5% (1/20). SO was suspected pre-operatively in 7/20 (35%) patients. Clinical concern for SO and ruptured globe were indications for ENEV in 50/9,092 (0.5%) and 872/9,092 (10%) patients, respectively. In the IRIS Registry, 0.7% (199/27,830) of patients with AAE/ENEV had diagnosis of SO. The frequency of SO between 2015-2020 was 0.01% (7,371/62,318,249); of these 7,371 cases, 199 (3%) had AAE/ENEV. In 25,975 patients with available data, injury and SO were listed as diagnoses less than 30 days prior to AAE/ENEV in 909 (4%) and 63 (0.2%) cases, respectively. Discussion/Conclusion: The frequency of SO in recent decades is low. Most cases of SO are not managed with eye removal. In histopathology-confirmed SO, surgical trauma is as frequent as non-surgical trauma as an inciting etiology of disease.","PeriodicalId":19434,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sympathetic ophthalmia in patients with enucleation or evisceration: pathology laboratory and IRIS® Registry experience\",\"authors\":\"Khanh Bui, Maurizio Tomaiolo, Kaylene Carter, Codrin Iacob, Vamsee Neerukonda, Anna Stagner, Zaynab Sajjadi, Katherine V. Escobar, Paula Ordoñez Armijos, Ralph C. Eagle, Sonia Mehta, James P. Dunn, Leslie Hyman, Tatyana Milman\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000533310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) is a rare bilateral granulomatous panuveitis that can follow surgical or non-surgical ocular trauma in one eye. Because its diagnosis requires clinical-pathologic correlation, the true incidence of SO is unknown, and there is a need to understand the recent trends in risk factors and frequency of this condition. Methods: Pathology records of all enucleated or eviscerated (ENEV) eyes at three pathology laboratories were reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, procedure indication, pathology diagnosis, and clinical history of trauma and uveitis. IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) was searched for all patients with SO, acquired absence of eye (AAE), and/or ENEV. Data obtained included patient demographics, ocular procedures, and preoperative diagnoses within 30 days of AAE/ENEV. Results: In the pathology laboratory setting, the incidence of SO over a 36-year period in patients who underwent ENEV was 0.2% (20/9,092); the 5-year incidence ranged from 0.0-0.3%. Among the 20 eyes with SO, the inciting event was surgical trauma in 50% (10/20), non-surgical trauma in 45% (9/20), and missing/undetermined in 5% (1/20). SO was suspected pre-operatively in 7/20 (35%) patients. Clinical concern for SO and ruptured globe were indications for ENEV in 50/9,092 (0.5%) and 872/9,092 (10%) patients, respectively. In the IRIS Registry, 0.7% (199/27,830) of patients with AAE/ENEV had diagnosis of SO. The frequency of SO between 2015-2020 was 0.01% (7,371/62,318,249); of these 7,371 cases, 199 (3%) had AAE/ENEV. In 25,975 patients with available data, injury and SO were listed as diagnoses less than 30 days prior to AAE/ENEV in 909 (4%) and 63 (0.2%) cases, respectively. Discussion/Conclusion: The frequency of SO in recent decades is low. Most cases of SO are not managed with eye removal. In histopathology-confirmed SO, surgical trauma is as frequent as non-surgical trauma as an inciting etiology of disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocular Oncology and Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocular Oncology and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
交感性眼炎(SO)是一种罕见的双侧肉芽肿性全葡萄膜炎,可在单眼手术或非手术眼外伤后发生。由于其诊断需要临床病理相关性,SO的真实发病率尚不清楚,因此有必要了解这种疾病的危险因素和频率的最新趋势。方法:回顾三个病理实验室对所有去核或去内脏(ENEV)眼的病理记录。收集的资料包括患者人口统计、手术指征、病理诊断、创伤和葡萄膜炎的临床病史。IRIS®Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight)检索所有SO、获得性缺眼(AAE)和/或ENEV患者。获得的数据包括患者人口统计学、眼科手术和AAE/ENEV 30天内的术前诊断。结果:在病理实验室环境中,接受ENEV的患者36年期间SO的发生率为0.2% (20/9,092);5年发病率为0.0-0.3%。在20只眼SO中,50%(10/20)为手术损伤,45%(9/20)为非手术损伤,5%(1/20)为缺失/不确定。7/20(35%)患者术前怀疑有SO。在50/9,092(0.5%)和872/9,092(10%)患者中,临床对SO和球破裂的关注分别是ENEV的适应症。在IRIS注册中,0.7%(199/27,830)的AAE/ENEV患者被诊断为SO。2015-2020年SO发生率为0.01% (7371 / 62318249);7371例中,AAE/ENEV 199例(3%)。在25,975例可获得数据的患者中,909例(4%)和63例(0.2%)分别在AAE/ENEV发生前不到30天被诊断为损伤和SO。讨论/结论:近几十年来,SO的发生率较低。大多数SO病例不能通过摘除眼睛来治疗。在组织病理学证实的SO中,手术创伤与非手术创伤一样常见,是疾病的诱因。
Sympathetic ophthalmia in patients with enucleation or evisceration: pathology laboratory and IRIS® Registry experience
Introduction: Sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) is a rare bilateral granulomatous panuveitis that can follow surgical or non-surgical ocular trauma in one eye. Because its diagnosis requires clinical-pathologic correlation, the true incidence of SO is unknown, and there is a need to understand the recent trends in risk factors and frequency of this condition. Methods: Pathology records of all enucleated or eviscerated (ENEV) eyes at three pathology laboratories were reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, procedure indication, pathology diagnosis, and clinical history of trauma and uveitis. IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) was searched for all patients with SO, acquired absence of eye (AAE), and/or ENEV. Data obtained included patient demographics, ocular procedures, and preoperative diagnoses within 30 days of AAE/ENEV. Results: In the pathology laboratory setting, the incidence of SO over a 36-year period in patients who underwent ENEV was 0.2% (20/9,092); the 5-year incidence ranged from 0.0-0.3%. Among the 20 eyes with SO, the inciting event was surgical trauma in 50% (10/20), non-surgical trauma in 45% (9/20), and missing/undetermined in 5% (1/20). SO was suspected pre-operatively in 7/20 (35%) patients. Clinical concern for SO and ruptured globe were indications for ENEV in 50/9,092 (0.5%) and 872/9,092 (10%) patients, respectively. In the IRIS Registry, 0.7% (199/27,830) of patients with AAE/ENEV had diagnosis of SO. The frequency of SO between 2015-2020 was 0.01% (7,371/62,318,249); of these 7,371 cases, 199 (3%) had AAE/ENEV. In 25,975 patients with available data, injury and SO were listed as diagnoses less than 30 days prior to AAE/ENEV in 909 (4%) and 63 (0.2%) cases, respectively. Discussion/Conclusion: The frequency of SO in recent decades is low. Most cases of SO are not managed with eye removal. In histopathology-confirmed SO, surgical trauma is as frequent as non-surgical trauma as an inciting etiology of disease.