注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)与特殊学习障碍-阅读亚型(阅读障碍):在写作任务中的表现

Patrícia Aparecida Zuanetti, Angela Cristina Pontes-Fernandes, Náthali Maganha de Moraes, Ana Paula Andrade Hamad, Marisa Tomoe Hebihara Fukuda
{"title":"注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)与特殊学习障碍-阅读亚型(阅读障碍):在写作任务中的表现","authors":"Patrícia Aparecida Zuanetti, Angela Cristina Pontes-Fernandes, Náthali Maganha de Moraes, Ana Paula Andrade Hamad, Marisa Tomoe Hebihara Fukuda","doi":"10.1590/1982-0216/20232567723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze and compare the writing performance between students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and students with dyslexia. Methods: altogether, 27 children participated in the study, divided into the groups G-ADHD and G-Dyslexia. Their writing was assessed with a test that uses word and pseudoword dictation. The analysis addressed their writing level, word/pseudoword writing performance, and misspelling types. The groups were compared with the two-proportion z-test between two samples and the Mann-Whitney test (α = 0.05). Results: only one child in G-Dyslexia out of the 27 participating children was classified at the syllabic-alphabetical level. The others were classified at the alphabetical level, with no statistical difference between the groups in this item. The analysis of word/pseudoword writing performance revealed a difference between mean total scores, in which G-ADHD performed better. This group also had a higher percentage of children whose performance was classified as adequate for their age. There was a difference in misspellings between the groups in the omission of syllables, omission/addition of letters in complex syllables, and total performance - G-dyslexia made such errors more often. Conclusion: children with ADHD performed better in writing than the ones with dyslexia. However, writing cannot be used as a diagnostic marker between these conditions.","PeriodicalId":53238,"journal":{"name":"Revista CEFAC","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) versus Specific Learning Disorder-Reading Subtype (Dyslexia): performance in writing tasks\",\"authors\":\"Patrícia Aparecida Zuanetti, Angela Cristina Pontes-Fernandes, Náthali Maganha de Moraes, Ana Paula Andrade Hamad, Marisa Tomoe Hebihara Fukuda\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1982-0216/20232567723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze and compare the writing performance between students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and students with dyslexia. Methods: altogether, 27 children participated in the study, divided into the groups G-ADHD and G-Dyslexia. Their writing was assessed with a test that uses word and pseudoword dictation. The analysis addressed their writing level, word/pseudoword writing performance, and misspelling types. The groups were compared with the two-proportion z-test between two samples and the Mann-Whitney test (α = 0.05). Results: only one child in G-Dyslexia out of the 27 participating children was classified at the syllabic-alphabetical level. The others were classified at the alphabetical level, with no statistical difference between the groups in this item. The analysis of word/pseudoword writing performance revealed a difference between mean total scores, in which G-ADHD performed better. This group also had a higher percentage of children whose performance was classified as adequate for their age. There was a difference in misspellings between the groups in the omission of syllables, omission/addition of letters in complex syllables, and total performance - G-dyslexia made such errors more often. Conclusion: children with ADHD performed better in writing than the ones with dyslexia. However, writing cannot be used as a diagnostic marker between these conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista CEFAC\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista CEFAC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20232567723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista CEFAC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20232567723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:分析比较注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)学生与阅读障碍学生的写作表现。方法:将27例儿童分为adhd组和阅读障碍组。他们的写作通过一个使用单词和假词听写的测试来评估。分析了他们的写作水平、单词/假词写作表现和拼写错误类型。各组间比较采用两样本间双比例z检验和Mann-Whitney检验(α = 0.05)。结果:27名参与调查的儿童中,只有1名g -失读症儿童在音节-字母水平上被分类。其他的按字母顺序分类,在这个项目中各组之间没有统计差异。对单词/假词写作表现的分析揭示了平均总分的差异,其中G-ADHD表现更好。这一组的孩子中,表现被认为符合其年龄的比例也更高。两组学生在遗漏音节、遗漏/添加复杂音节中的字母以及整体表现方面的拼写错误有所不同——g型失读症更容易出现这类错误。结论:ADHD患儿在写作方面的表现优于阅读障碍患儿。然而,书写不能作为这些条件之间的诊断标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) versus Specific Learning Disorder-Reading Subtype (Dyslexia): performance in writing tasks
ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze and compare the writing performance between students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and students with dyslexia. Methods: altogether, 27 children participated in the study, divided into the groups G-ADHD and G-Dyslexia. Their writing was assessed with a test that uses word and pseudoword dictation. The analysis addressed their writing level, word/pseudoword writing performance, and misspelling types. The groups were compared with the two-proportion z-test between two samples and the Mann-Whitney test (α = 0.05). Results: only one child in G-Dyslexia out of the 27 participating children was classified at the syllabic-alphabetical level. The others were classified at the alphabetical level, with no statistical difference between the groups in this item. The analysis of word/pseudoword writing performance revealed a difference between mean total scores, in which G-ADHD performed better. This group also had a higher percentage of children whose performance was classified as adequate for their age. There was a difference in misspellings between the groups in the omission of syllables, omission/addition of letters in complex syllables, and total performance - G-dyslexia made such errors more often. Conclusion: children with ADHD performed better in writing than the ones with dyslexia. However, writing cannot be used as a diagnostic marker between these conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Contributions of urban planning for more food security in German cities]. Galvanic vestibular stimulation to improve postural instability, voluntary attention, and quality of life in Parkinson's disease patients Construction and validation of an informative handbook on speech-language-hearing therapy in primary health care Auditory middle latency responses and hearing skills in adults Electromyographic analysis of suprahyoid musculature before and after therapy taping in young women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1