Gordan M Vujanić, Laura Galluzzo Mutti, Sergey D Popov
{"title":"儿童肾肿瘤:分类、形态学、分子特征和预后的新进展","authors":"Gordan M Vujanić, Laura Galluzzo Mutti, Sergey D Popov","doi":"10.1016/j.mpdhp.2023.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Despite being one of the most frequent solid tumours in children, </span>renal tumours<span><span><span> are uncommon. Their accurate diagnosis and staging are essential for the appropriate treatment because they comprise a variety of entities with a broad spectrum of clinical, histological, molecular biology, and prognostic features. </span>Wilms tumour (WT) accounts for 80–85% of renal tumours of childhood, whereas other tumours including </span>mesoblastic nephroma, </span></span>clear cell sarcoma, </span>rhabdoid tumour<span><span><span>, renal cell carcinoma, and others are extremely uncommon (up to 2%–4% each), which explains why they pose a significant diagnostic challenge for </span>pathologists<span>. There are two major study groups with different treatment approaches but very comparable outcomes. The International Society of Paediatric Oncology<span> approach (followed in most of the world) is based on preoperative chemotherapy, followed by surgery and further therapy, whereas the Children's Oncology Group approach (followed mainly in the United States and Canada) is based on primary surgery, followed by postoperative treatment. In both study groups for WT the most important </span></span></span>prognostic factors<span> are histological type and stage. The criteria for subtyping and staging are similar but still differ between the study groups, making a direct comparison impossible, but nevertheless, the outcomes are remarkably similar. The chapter provides an update on pathology, recent molecular discoveries and prognosis in paediatric renal tumours.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":39961,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Histopathology","volume":"29 12","pages":"Pages 544-553"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renal tumours of childhood: what's new in classification, morphology, molecular findings and prognosis\",\"authors\":\"Gordan M Vujanić, Laura Galluzzo Mutti, Sergey D Popov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mpdhp.2023.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span><span>Despite being one of the most frequent solid tumours in children, </span>renal tumours<span><span><span> are uncommon. Their accurate diagnosis and staging are essential for the appropriate treatment because they comprise a variety of entities with a broad spectrum of clinical, histological, molecular biology, and prognostic features. </span>Wilms tumour (WT) accounts for 80–85% of renal tumours of childhood, whereas other tumours including </span>mesoblastic nephroma, </span></span>clear cell sarcoma, </span>rhabdoid tumour<span><span><span>, renal cell carcinoma, and others are extremely uncommon (up to 2%–4% each), which explains why they pose a significant diagnostic challenge for </span>pathologists<span>. There are two major study groups with different treatment approaches but very comparable outcomes. The International Society of Paediatric Oncology<span> approach (followed in most of the world) is based on preoperative chemotherapy, followed by surgery and further therapy, whereas the Children's Oncology Group approach (followed mainly in the United States and Canada) is based on primary surgery, followed by postoperative treatment. In both study groups for WT the most important </span></span></span>prognostic factors<span> are histological type and stage. The criteria for subtyping and staging are similar but still differ between the study groups, making a direct comparison impossible, but nevertheless, the outcomes are remarkably similar. The chapter provides an update on pathology, recent molecular discoveries and prognosis in paediatric renal tumours.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic Histopathology\",\"volume\":\"29 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 544-553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic Histopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756231723001470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756231723001470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Renal tumours of childhood: what's new in classification, morphology, molecular findings and prognosis
Despite being one of the most frequent solid tumours in children, renal tumours are uncommon. Their accurate diagnosis and staging are essential for the appropriate treatment because they comprise a variety of entities with a broad spectrum of clinical, histological, molecular biology, and prognostic features. Wilms tumour (WT) accounts for 80–85% of renal tumours of childhood, whereas other tumours including mesoblastic nephroma, clear cell sarcoma, rhabdoid tumour, renal cell carcinoma, and others are extremely uncommon (up to 2%–4% each), which explains why they pose a significant diagnostic challenge for pathologists. There are two major study groups with different treatment approaches but very comparable outcomes. The International Society of Paediatric Oncology approach (followed in most of the world) is based on preoperative chemotherapy, followed by surgery and further therapy, whereas the Children's Oncology Group approach (followed mainly in the United States and Canada) is based on primary surgery, followed by postoperative treatment. In both study groups for WT the most important prognostic factors are histological type and stage. The criteria for subtyping and staging are similar but still differ between the study groups, making a direct comparison impossible, but nevertheless, the outcomes are remarkably similar. The chapter provides an update on pathology, recent molecular discoveries and prognosis in paediatric renal tumours.
期刊介绍:
This monthly review journal aims to provide the practising diagnostic pathologist and trainee pathologist with up-to-date reviews on histopathology and cytology and related technical advances. Each issue contains invited articles on a variety of topics from experts in the field and includes a mini-symposium exploring one subject in greater depth. Articles consist of system-based, disease-based reviews and advances in technology. They update the readers on day-to-day diagnostic work and keep them informed of important new developments. An additional feature is the short section devoted to hypotheses; these have been refereed. There is also a correspondence section.