二等公民还是自由人?全球离岸外包安排中承包商公平观念的社会建构

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of International Management Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.intman.2023.101092
Jennifer L. Gibbs , Julia Eisenberg , Dina Nekrassova
{"title":"二等公民还是自由人?全球离岸外包安排中承包商公平观念的社会建构","authors":"Jennifer L. Gibbs ,&nbsp;Julia Eisenberg ,&nbsp;Dina Nekrassova","doi":"10.1016/j.intman.2023.101092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the ways in which perceptions of equity are socially constructed among contractors involved in global offshoring arrangements. A comparative case study of two global software organizations involved in offshore outsourcing reveals that global contractors across sites constructed different equity perceptions of similar foreign assignments due to a number of contextual factors. These contextual differences combined to produce social comparison processes that led to the construction of different equity perceptions. Drawing on a perceptual model of equity theory, we find that global contractors from one case felt stigmatized and treated inequitably as “second-class citizens”, while those from the other case felt empowered as “free agents.” Our findings contribute a context-sensitive explanation for the construction of different equity perceptions in global offshoring arrangements, with implications for global work design more broadly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Management","volume":"29 6","pages":"Article 101092"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425323000893/pdfft?md5=4dfa176352345af77681c0abce59ebdc&pid=1-s2.0-S1075425323000893-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second-Class Citizens or Free Agents? Social Construction of Equity Perceptions of Contractors in Global Offshoring Arrangements\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer L. Gibbs ,&nbsp;Julia Eisenberg ,&nbsp;Dina Nekrassova\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intman.2023.101092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examines the ways in which perceptions of equity are socially constructed among contractors involved in global offshoring arrangements. A comparative case study of two global software organizations involved in offshore outsourcing reveals that global contractors across sites constructed different equity perceptions of similar foreign assignments due to a number of contextual factors. These contextual differences combined to produce social comparison processes that led to the construction of different equity perceptions. Drawing on a perceptual model of equity theory, we find that global contractors from one case felt stigmatized and treated inequitably as “second-class citizens”, while those from the other case felt empowered as “free agents.” Our findings contribute a context-sensitive explanation for the construction of different equity perceptions in global offshoring arrangements, with implications for global work design more broadly.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Management\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 101092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425323000893/pdfft?md5=4dfa176352345af77681c0abce59ebdc&pid=1-s2.0-S1075425323000893-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425323000893\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425323000893","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了参与全球离岸外包安排的承包商对公平观念的社会建构方式。对涉及离岸外包的两个全球软件组织的比较案例研究表明,由于许多背景因素,不同地点的全球承包商对类似的外国任务构建了不同的公平观念。这些背景差异结合在一起产生了社会比较过程,导致了不同公平观念的构建。利用公平理论的感知模型,我们发现来自一个案例的全球承包商感到被污名化,并被不公平地对待为“二等公民”,而来自另一个案例的承包商则感到被赋予了“自由代理人”的权力。我们的研究结果为全球离岸外包安排中不同公平观念的构建提供了上下文敏感的解释,对更广泛的全球工作设计具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Second-Class Citizens or Free Agents? Social Construction of Equity Perceptions of Contractors in Global Offshoring Arrangements

This study examines the ways in which perceptions of equity are socially constructed among contractors involved in global offshoring arrangements. A comparative case study of two global software organizations involved in offshore outsourcing reveals that global contractors across sites constructed different equity perceptions of similar foreign assignments due to a number of contextual factors. These contextual differences combined to produce social comparison processes that led to the construction of different equity perceptions. Drawing on a perceptual model of equity theory, we find that global contractors from one case felt stigmatized and treated inequitably as “second-class citizens”, while those from the other case felt empowered as “free agents.” Our findings contribute a context-sensitive explanation for the construction of different equity perceptions in global offshoring arrangements, with implications for global work design more broadly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.80%
发文量
67
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Management is devoted to advancing an understanding of issues in the management of global enterprises, global management theory, and practice; and providing theoretical and managerial implications useful for the further development of research. It is designed to serve an audience of academic researchers and educators, as well as business professionals, by publishing both theoretical and empirical research relating to international management and strategy issues. JIM publishes theoretical and empirical research addressing international business strategy, comparative and cross-cultural management, risk management, organizational behavior, and human resource management, among others.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial on Doing business in Africa: Navigating opportunities and challenges in Africa's emerging markets Global strategy evolution, devolution or revolution: Disruptions to globalization and international business introversion When Global is Not Enough: Applying a Paradox Lens to Sustainability Transitions in Interorganizational Systems The joint effects of institutional logic multiplicity and distance on within-MNE CSR performance differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1