Davíd G. Martínez, David Osworth, David S. Knight, Julian Vasquez Heilig
{"title":"南方好客:种族主义美国的民主与学校财政政策实践","authors":"Davíd G. Martínez, David Osworth, David S. Knight, Julian Vasquez Heilig","doi":"10.1080/0161956x.2023.2261308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recent evidence suggests school resources are continually segregated from minoritized communities. This funding disparity impacts students’ long-term outcomes in school and in their community. Political discourse has prioritized school defunding, privatization through vouchers and related policies, and tax relief and at the same time greater regulation of curriculum, content, and pedagogy in schools. Southern states in particular have moved to restrict access to a discourse of liberation and are threatening sanctions if schools implement specific content (e.g., race, and oppression). We explore the potential for school finance to create spaces that decrease democratic participation through school funding disparity. We use district-level panel data that combines National Center for Education Statistics and Census data from 2000 to 2018 to explore the patterns of school funding disparity in nine southern states; Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. We find racial/ethnic make-up interacts with specific funding variables so that districts with higher percentages of minoritized students are at a disadvantage financially. We also find that states may over rely on local and federal funds to maintain funding levels despite increases in cost pressures.","PeriodicalId":39777,"journal":{"name":"Peabody Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Southern Hospitality: Democracy and School Finance Policy Praxis in Racist America\",\"authors\":\"Davíd G. Martínez, David Osworth, David S. Knight, Julian Vasquez Heilig\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0161956x.2023.2261308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Recent evidence suggests school resources are continually segregated from minoritized communities. This funding disparity impacts students’ long-term outcomes in school and in their community. Political discourse has prioritized school defunding, privatization through vouchers and related policies, and tax relief and at the same time greater regulation of curriculum, content, and pedagogy in schools. Southern states in particular have moved to restrict access to a discourse of liberation and are threatening sanctions if schools implement specific content (e.g., race, and oppression). We explore the potential for school finance to create spaces that decrease democratic participation through school funding disparity. We use district-level panel data that combines National Center for Education Statistics and Census data from 2000 to 2018 to explore the patterns of school funding disparity in nine southern states; Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. We find racial/ethnic make-up interacts with specific funding variables so that districts with higher percentages of minoritized students are at a disadvantage financially. We also find that states may over rely on local and federal funds to maintain funding levels despite increases in cost pressures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peabody Journal of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peabody Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.2023.2261308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peabody Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.2023.2261308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要最近的证据表明,学校资源不断地从少数群体中分离出来。这种资金差距影响了学生在学校和社区的长期成果。政治话语优先考虑的是取消对学校的资助,通过代金券和相关政策实现私有化,以及减税,同时加强对学校课程、内容和教学方法的监管。特别是南方各州已经采取行动,限制对解放话语的访问,并威胁如果学校实施特定内容(例如,种族和压迫)将受到制裁。我们探索了学校财政的潜力,通过学校资金差距创造减少民主参与的空间。我们使用了地区层面的面板数据,结合了2000年至2018年的国家教育统计中心和人口普查数据,探索了南方九个州的学校资金差距模式;阿拉巴马州、乔治亚州、肯塔基州、密西西比州、北卡罗来纳州、南卡罗来纳州、田纳西州、弗吉尼亚州和西弗吉尼亚州。我们发现种族/民族构成与特定的资金变量相互作用,因此少数民族学生比例较高的地区在经济上处于不利地位。我们还发现,尽管成本压力增加,但各州可能过度依赖地方和联邦基金来维持资金水平。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。关于contributorsDavíd G. MartínezDavíd G. Martínez,博士,南卡罗来纳大学教育学院教育领导与政策系助理教授。Davíd是一位千变万化的批判性学校财政政策学者,通过多方法调查将政策知识与实践联系起来。他的研究主要集中在教育财政政策、批判理论/批判种族理论和教育机会公平的交叉领域。通过罗尔斯的社会正义和亚里士多德的公平,Davíd试图了解学校财政政策如何影响低收入,种族和语言多样化,少数群体社区的资金可用性和支出。David Osworth是南卡罗来纳大学领导、学习设计和探究系的博士候选人和研究生研究助理。他拥有医学博士学位。获得罗格斯大学学士学位。David使用批判性的研究方法,通过对教育政策和领导力的研究来质疑公平和机会。他目前的研究主要集中在学校接管,学校纪律和地区-大学的合作伙伴关系。David S. Knight,华盛顿大学教育财政与政策副教授。他的研究考察了学校财政政策,重点关注资金公平、教育工作者劳动力市场和成本效益分析。他从经济理论和方法论的角度研究教育系统。他的工作重点是分配正义、种族/民族和社会经济金融公平,以及旨在减少不平等、改善资源分配策略和解决长期存在的种族和收入基础的教育机会差异的政策。他的作品发表在领先的学术期刊上,并被全国媒体报道,如EdWeek, NPR和西雅图时报。Julian Vasquez Heilig是西密歇根大学教务长兼学术事务副总裁,他在提高全国排名、促进多样性和入学率方面发挥了重要作用。他专注于K-12教育、公平和创新,撰写了75多篇出版物,并跻身EdWeek美国前200名教育学者之列。Heilig在立法机构作证,为政治竞选提供建议,并为许多教育组织做志愿者。他的名字获得了30多个奖项,包括加利福尼亚州议会的荣誉,教育杂志的多样性,并被委任为肯塔基上校,他的影响是全国公认的。他拥有斯坦福大学的博士学位和密歇根大学的其他学位。他的作品也出现在《纽约时报》和《华盛顿邮报》等主要媒体上。完整简历:bit.ly/ProfJVHcv。
Southern Hospitality: Democracy and School Finance Policy Praxis in Racist America
ABSTRACT Recent evidence suggests school resources are continually segregated from minoritized communities. This funding disparity impacts students’ long-term outcomes in school and in their community. Political discourse has prioritized school defunding, privatization through vouchers and related policies, and tax relief and at the same time greater regulation of curriculum, content, and pedagogy in schools. Southern states in particular have moved to restrict access to a discourse of liberation and are threatening sanctions if schools implement specific content (e.g., race, and oppression). We explore the potential for school finance to create spaces that decrease democratic participation through school funding disparity. We use district-level panel data that combines National Center for Education Statistics and Census data from 2000 to 2018 to explore the patterns of school funding disparity in nine southern states; Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. We find racial/ethnic make-up interacts with specific funding variables so that districts with higher percentages of minoritized students are at a disadvantage financially. We also find that states may over rely on local and federal funds to maintain funding levels despite increases in cost pressures.
期刊介绍:
Peabody Journal of Education (PJE) publishes quarterly symposia in the broad area of education, including but not limited to topics related to formal institutions serving students in early childhood, pre-school, primary, elementary, intermediate, secondary, post-secondary, and tertiary education. The scope of the journal includes special kinds of educational institutions, such as those providing vocational training or the schooling for students with disabilities. PJE also welcomes manuscript submissions that concentrate on informal education dynamics, those outside the immediate framework of institutions, and education matters that are important to nations outside the United States.