谦虚的君子为何冷酷无情?谦逊领导的负面效应研究——基于低地位补偿理论的视角

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION International Journal of Conflict Management Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1108/ijcma-05-2023-0099
Hao Chen, Jianming Jiang, Liang Wang, Zihan Zhang, Jiaying Bao
{"title":"谦虚的君子为何冷酷无情?谦逊领导的负面效应研究——基于低地位补偿理论的视角","authors":"Hao Chen, Jianming Jiang, Liang Wang, Zihan Zhang, Jiaying Bao","doi":"10.1108/ijcma-05-2023-0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this study is to reveal the mechanism of humble leadership inducing abusive supervision from the low-status compensation perspective, examining the mediation role of leader perceived thread to status. Besides, the moderation effect of regulatory focus on the mediation path is discussed. Design/methodology/approach This study conducted a three-wave longitudinal survey. The data was collected from 438 leaders and their employees in five Chinese enterprises. This study used Mplus 7.4 and adopted a bootstrapping technique for data analysis. Findings Humble leadership has a positive effect on leader perceived threat to status. Leader perceived threat to status plays a mediation role between humble leadership and leader abusive supervision. Leader regulatory focus is the “gate valve” that humble leadership fosters leader abusive supervision. That is, when the leader promotion focus is high, leader perceived threat to status bred by humble leadership is low, resulting in less abusive supervision. When the leader prevention focus is high, humble leadership brings relatively more abusive supervision through perceived threat to status. Originality/value This study explores why humble leadership breeds abusive supervision behaviors and reveals the mechanism behind the negative effect of humble leadership based on low-status compensation theory. This study not only promotes the continuous development of the field of humble leadership research through empirical research but also provides guidance for effectively suppressing the negative effects of humble leadership, promoting strengths and avoiding weaknesses and suppressing inappropriate management behaviors in management practice.","PeriodicalId":47382,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Conflict Management","volume":"189 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why is a modest gentleman cruel and ruthless? A study on the dark side effect of humble leadership – from the perspective of low-status compensation theory\",\"authors\":\"Hao Chen, Jianming Jiang, Liang Wang, Zihan Zhang, Jiaying Bao\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijcma-05-2023-0099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose The purpose of this study is to reveal the mechanism of humble leadership inducing abusive supervision from the low-status compensation perspective, examining the mediation role of leader perceived thread to status. Besides, the moderation effect of regulatory focus on the mediation path is discussed. Design/methodology/approach This study conducted a three-wave longitudinal survey. The data was collected from 438 leaders and their employees in five Chinese enterprises. This study used Mplus 7.4 and adopted a bootstrapping technique for data analysis. Findings Humble leadership has a positive effect on leader perceived threat to status. Leader perceived threat to status plays a mediation role between humble leadership and leader abusive supervision. Leader regulatory focus is the “gate valve” that humble leadership fosters leader abusive supervision. That is, when the leader promotion focus is high, leader perceived threat to status bred by humble leadership is low, resulting in less abusive supervision. When the leader prevention focus is high, humble leadership brings relatively more abusive supervision through perceived threat to status. Originality/value This study explores why humble leadership breeds abusive supervision behaviors and reveals the mechanism behind the negative effect of humble leadership based on low-status compensation theory. This study not only promotes the continuous development of the field of humble leadership research through empirical research but also provides guidance for effectively suppressing the negative effects of humble leadership, promoting strengths and avoiding weaknesses and suppressing inappropriate management behaviors in management practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Conflict Management\",\"volume\":\"189 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Conflict Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-05-2023-0099\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Conflict Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-05-2023-0099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在从低地位补偿视角揭示谦逊领导诱导虐待监督的机制,考察领导者感知线索对地位的中介作用。此外,本文还探讨了监管焦点对中介路径的调节作用。设计/方法/方法本研究进行了三波纵向调查。调查数据来自5家中国企业的438名领导及其员工。本研究使用Mplus 7.4,采用bootstrapping技术进行数据分析。发现谦逊型领导对领导者感知到的地位威胁有正向影响。领导者地位威胁感知在谦卑型领导与领导者滥用型监督之间起中介作用。领导者监管焦点是“闸阀”,谦卑的领导助长了领导者滥用监管。也就是说,当领导者对晋升的关注程度高时,谦逊型领导所产生的地位威胁感知程度就低,从而导致滥用性监督的减少。当领导预防焦点高时,谦逊型领导通过感知到的地位威胁带来的虐待性监督相对较多。本研究以低地位补偿理论为基础,探讨了谦逊型领导滋生滥用监督行为的原因,揭示了谦逊型领导负面效应背后的机制。本研究不仅通过实证研究促进了谦逊领导研究领域的不断发展,而且对管理实践中有效抑制谦逊领导的负面影响、扬长避短、抑制不当管理行为具有指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why is a modest gentleman cruel and ruthless? A study on the dark side effect of humble leadership – from the perspective of low-status compensation theory
Purpose The purpose of this study is to reveal the mechanism of humble leadership inducing abusive supervision from the low-status compensation perspective, examining the mediation role of leader perceived thread to status. Besides, the moderation effect of regulatory focus on the mediation path is discussed. Design/methodology/approach This study conducted a three-wave longitudinal survey. The data was collected from 438 leaders and their employees in five Chinese enterprises. This study used Mplus 7.4 and adopted a bootstrapping technique for data analysis. Findings Humble leadership has a positive effect on leader perceived threat to status. Leader perceived threat to status plays a mediation role between humble leadership and leader abusive supervision. Leader regulatory focus is the “gate valve” that humble leadership fosters leader abusive supervision. That is, when the leader promotion focus is high, leader perceived threat to status bred by humble leadership is low, resulting in less abusive supervision. When the leader prevention focus is high, humble leadership brings relatively more abusive supervision through perceived threat to status. Originality/value This study explores why humble leadership breeds abusive supervision behaviors and reveals the mechanism behind the negative effect of humble leadership based on low-status compensation theory. This study not only promotes the continuous development of the field of humble leadership research through empirical research but also provides guidance for effectively suppressing the negative effects of humble leadership, promoting strengths and avoiding weaknesses and suppressing inappropriate management behaviors in management practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Conflict management 101: how emotional intelligence can make or break a manager The relationship between management vs nonmanagement status and women employees’ dissent expression in US organizations Social strife at work: unravelling the link between workplace relationship conflict and employee ostracism behavior Does the conflict between work and family hinder thriving? Role of depersonalization and intrinsic motivation Workplace bullying and employee silence: the role of affect-based trust and climate for conflict management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1