33年<em> /em>:展望未来

Q3 Social Sciences Journal of Technology Education Pub Date : 2023-06-16 DOI:10.21061/jte.v34i2.a.2
John Wells
{"title":"33年&lt;em&gt; /em&gt;:展望未来","authors":"John Wells","doi":"10.21061/jte.v34i2.a.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic standards in the United States advocate for the integration of science, and technology and engineering (T&amp;E) content and practices within the elementary grades (ITEEA, 2020; NGSS Lead States, 2013). However, elementary educators often receive limited preparation for developing and facilitating safer hands-on science and T&amp;E learning experiences (Love, 2017a), which can contribute to their reluctance to integrate science and T&amp;E instruction. This study addresses the issue by examining changes in elementary pre-service teachers’ (PSTs) views toward safety and perceived preparation to safely infuse design-based science and T&amp;E instruction following participation in an integrative science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education (Wells &amp; Ernst, 2015) methods course. A cohort of 27 elementary PSTs were split into two class sections. The control group participated in a safety jigsaw lesson the first day of classes, whereas the experiment group participated in a safety warm-up activity at the beginning of every class throughout the 15-week semester. Findings indicate all participants reported significant gains in self-efficacy and expected outcomes toward safety, views about the percentage of time elementary integrative STEM lessons should include hands-on learning experiences, perceived knowledge of integrative STEM safety concepts, and perceived ability to safely teach integrative STEM lessons. Further analyses revealed no significant differences between the two class sections. Results suggest that, in addition to emphasizing and demonstrating required safety protocols before any activity, varying strategies used to embed safety instruction in methods courses can significantly increase elementary PSTs’ views toward safety in integrative STEM education.","PeriodicalId":39755,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology Education","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"33 Years of the &lt;em&gt;JTE&lt;/em&gt;: Visioning Forward\",\"authors\":\"John Wells\",\"doi\":\"10.21061/jte.v34i2.a.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Academic standards in the United States advocate for the integration of science, and technology and engineering (T&amp;E) content and practices within the elementary grades (ITEEA, 2020; NGSS Lead States, 2013). However, elementary educators often receive limited preparation for developing and facilitating safer hands-on science and T&amp;E learning experiences (Love, 2017a), which can contribute to their reluctance to integrate science and T&amp;E instruction. This study addresses the issue by examining changes in elementary pre-service teachers’ (PSTs) views toward safety and perceived preparation to safely infuse design-based science and T&amp;E instruction following participation in an integrative science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education (Wells &amp; Ernst, 2015) methods course. A cohort of 27 elementary PSTs were split into two class sections. The control group participated in a safety jigsaw lesson the first day of classes, whereas the experiment group participated in a safety warm-up activity at the beginning of every class throughout the 15-week semester. Findings indicate all participants reported significant gains in self-efficacy and expected outcomes toward safety, views about the percentage of time elementary integrative STEM lessons should include hands-on learning experiences, perceived knowledge of integrative STEM safety concepts, and perceived ability to safely teach integrative STEM lessons. Further analyses revealed no significant differences between the two class sections. Results suggest that, in addition to emphasizing and demonstrating required safety protocols before any activity, varying strategies used to embed safety instruction in methods courses can significantly increase elementary PSTs’ views toward safety in integrative STEM education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Technology Education\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Technology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v34i2.a.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v34i2.a.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国的学术标准提倡在小学年级中整合科学、技术和工程(T&E)的内容和实践(ITEEA, 2020;NGSS领导国家,2013年)。然而,小学教育工作者在开发和促进更安全的动手科学和电子教学体验方面所做的准备往往有限(Love, 2017a),这可能导致他们不愿将科学和电子教学结合起来。本研究通过调查小学职前教师(pst)在参与综合科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育后,对安全注入基于设计的科学和技术教学的安全性和感知准备的看法的变化来解决这个问题。Ernst, 2015)方法课程。一组27名初级pst被分成两个班。对照组在第一天上课时参加安全拼图课程,而实验组在15周的学期中每堂课开始时都参加安全热身活动。研究结果表明,所有参与者都报告了自我效能感和对安全性的预期结果的显着提高,对基础综合STEM课程的时间百分比的看法应包括实践学习经验,对综合STEM安全概念的感知知识,以及安全教授综合STEM课程的感知能力。进一步的分析显示,两个类别之间没有显著差异。结果表明,除了在任何活动之前强调和展示所需的安全协议外,在方法课程中嵌入安全教学的不同策略可以显著提高初级pst对综合STEM教育中的安全性的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
33 Years of the <em>JTE</em>: Visioning Forward
Academic standards in the United States advocate for the integration of science, and technology and engineering (T&E) content and practices within the elementary grades (ITEEA, 2020; NGSS Lead States, 2013). However, elementary educators often receive limited preparation for developing and facilitating safer hands-on science and T&E learning experiences (Love, 2017a), which can contribute to their reluctance to integrate science and T&E instruction. This study addresses the issue by examining changes in elementary pre-service teachers’ (PSTs) views toward safety and perceived preparation to safely infuse design-based science and T&E instruction following participation in an integrative science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education (Wells & Ernst, 2015) methods course. A cohort of 27 elementary PSTs were split into two class sections. The control group participated in a safety jigsaw lesson the first day of classes, whereas the experiment group participated in a safety warm-up activity at the beginning of every class throughout the 15-week semester. Findings indicate all participants reported significant gains in self-efficacy and expected outcomes toward safety, views about the percentage of time elementary integrative STEM lessons should include hands-on learning experiences, perceived knowledge of integrative STEM safety concepts, and perceived ability to safely teach integrative STEM lessons. Further analyses revealed no significant differences between the two class sections. Results suggest that, in addition to emphasizing and demonstrating required safety protocols before any activity, varying strategies used to embed safety instruction in methods courses can significantly increase elementary PSTs’ views toward safety in integrative STEM education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Technology Education
Journal of Technology Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Technology Education provides a forum for scholarly discussion on topics relating to technology education. Manuscripts should focus on technology education research, philosophy, and theory. In addition, the Journal publishes book reviews, editorials, guest articles, comprehensive literature reviews, and reactions to previously published articles.
期刊最新文献
Changes in Students’ Design-Thinking Mindsets after Design-Based Learning with Respect to Gender and Prior Experiences in Design&nbsp; 33 Years of the <em>JTE</em>: Visioning Forward Embracing Computational Thinking as an Impetus for Artificial Intelligence in Integrated STEM Disciplines through Engineering and Technology Education&nbsp; Miscellany Embedding Safety in Integrative STEM Teaching Methods Courses for Pre-Service Elementary Teachers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1