走向主权领土之路:从中国现代领土宪法想象中解读中国的(反)联邦思想

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1093/icon/moad047
Ming-Sung Kuo
{"title":"走向主权领土之路:从中国现代领土宪法想象中解读中国的(反)联邦思想","authors":"Ming-Sung Kuo","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article aims to shed light on how China has (re)imagined the geographical distribution of authority on its path towards modern statehood by unpacking the debate surrounding the constitutional status of Hong Kong in China’s territorial constitution. Challenging the conventional wisdom that China is constitutionally impervious to the federal idea, it makes a threefold argument. First, elements of federalism do exist in China, as intimated in its territorial constitution regarding Hong Kong, but have become nearly invisible as the relationship between mainland China and Hong Kong is traveling in the opposite direction. Second, the opposite development is attributable to the antifederal idea embedded in China’s modern constitutional imaginary, which has been shaped by its multifaceted experience with federalism in history. Under the antifederal idea, intimations of federalism in China’s territorial constitution are far from the bridge to a full-fledged Chinese federation, but only meant to be instrumental and transitional. Third, the antifederal idea reflects China’s modern territorial constitutional imaginary under which variegated imperial frontiers are reimagined as homogenized state territory. In conclusion, China’s encounter with Western legal concepts is formative of the Chinese modern constitutional imaginary and thus further influences its attitude towards federalism in framing the territorial constitution.","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":"13 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The path towards sovereign territory: Reading China’s (anti)federal idea against its modern territorial constitutional imaginary\",\"authors\":\"Ming-Sung Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icon/moad047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article aims to shed light on how China has (re)imagined the geographical distribution of authority on its path towards modern statehood by unpacking the debate surrounding the constitutional status of Hong Kong in China’s territorial constitution. Challenging the conventional wisdom that China is constitutionally impervious to the federal idea, it makes a threefold argument. First, elements of federalism do exist in China, as intimated in its territorial constitution regarding Hong Kong, but have become nearly invisible as the relationship between mainland China and Hong Kong is traveling in the opposite direction. Second, the opposite development is attributable to the antifederal idea embedded in China’s modern constitutional imaginary, which has been shaped by its multifaceted experience with federalism in history. Under the antifederal idea, intimations of federalism in China’s territorial constitution are far from the bridge to a full-fledged Chinese federation, but only meant to be instrumental and transitional. Third, the antifederal idea reflects China’s modern territorial constitutional imaginary under which variegated imperial frontiers are reimagined as homogenized state territory. In conclusion, China’s encounter with Western legal concepts is formative of the Chinese modern constitutional imaginary and thus further influences its attitude towards federalism in framing the territorial constitution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law\",\"volume\":\"13 8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad047\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在通过解析围绕香港在中国领土宪法中的宪法地位的辩论,揭示中国在走向现代国家的道路上如何(重新)想象权力的地理分布。它挑战了传统观念,即中国在宪法上不受联邦制理念的影响,并提出了三个论点。首先,联邦制的元素在中国确实存在,正如其领土宪法中对香港的暗示,但随着中国大陆和香港之间的关系朝着相反的方向发展,联邦制的元素已经变得几乎看不见了。其次,相反的发展可归因于中国现代宪法想象中嵌入的反联邦思想,这是由其历史上多方面的联邦制经验形成的。在反联邦制的思想下,中国领土宪法中的联邦制暗示远不是通往成熟的中国联邦的桥梁,而只是工具性和过渡性的。第三,反联邦思想反映了中国现代领土宪法的想象,在这种想象下,各种各样的帝国边界被重新想象为同质化的国家领土。总之,中国与西方法律概念的相遇形成了中国现代宪法想象,从而进一步影响了中国在制定领土宪法时对联邦制的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The path towards sovereign territory: Reading China’s (anti)federal idea against its modern territorial constitutional imaginary
Abstract This article aims to shed light on how China has (re)imagined the geographical distribution of authority on its path towards modern statehood by unpacking the debate surrounding the constitutional status of Hong Kong in China’s territorial constitution. Challenging the conventional wisdom that China is constitutionally impervious to the federal idea, it makes a threefold argument. First, elements of federalism do exist in China, as intimated in its territorial constitution regarding Hong Kong, but have become nearly invisible as the relationship between mainland China and Hong Kong is traveling in the opposite direction. Second, the opposite development is attributable to the antifederal idea embedded in China’s modern constitutional imaginary, which has been shaped by its multifaceted experience with federalism in history. Under the antifederal idea, intimations of federalism in China’s territorial constitution are far from the bridge to a full-fledged Chinese federation, but only meant to be instrumental and transitional. Third, the antifederal idea reflects China’s modern territorial constitutional imaginary under which variegated imperial frontiers are reimagined as homogenized state territory. In conclusion, China’s encounter with Western legal concepts is formative of the Chinese modern constitutional imaginary and thus further influences its attitude towards federalism in framing the territorial constitution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
Julie C. Suk. After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do about It Comparative judicial federalism Control and paralysis? A context-sensitive analysis of objections to supermajorities in constitutional adjudication Constituent power: From Schmitt to Kantorowicz—Afterword to the Foreword by Sergio Verdugo Can the people exercise constituent power?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1