模块化建设项目风险管理的多准则决策模型

IF 3.4 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY International Journal of Construction Management Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1080/15623599.2023.2276649
Sabah Khodabocus, Senem Seyis
{"title":"模块化建设项目风险管理的多准则决策模型","authors":"Sabah Khodabocus, Senem Seyis","doi":"10.1080/15623599.2023.2276649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe modular sector needs a precise guide to determine the most efficient risk management approaches. The main research objective of this study is to develop a multi-criteria decision-making model to find the most efficient risk management approach according to the relevant risk criteria. The risk criteria and risk management approaches for modular construction projects were also identified and classified within this scope. A systematic literature review, semi-structured interviews, and open-ended questionnaires were performed for identification and classification purposes. For ranking and quantifying the identified risks and risk approaches, as well as developing the decision-making model, the Delphi method and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) were conducted. A two-round Delphi method, with eleven experts, was conducted to achieve efficient performance scores of the identified risk management approaches. The percentage standard deviation decreased, Relative Importance Index (RII), Cronbach’s alpha, and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (Kendall’s W) were calculated to ensure the outputs’ reliability, validity, and agreement level. The AHP method opted to quantify the Delphi method outputs, solve the multi-criteria decision-making process, and develop the multi-criteria decision-making model for risk management of modular construction projects. Triangulation results show that the critical risk categories are supply chain, health and safety, stakeholders, and governmental support. Lean principles such as the Last Planner System, Value Stream Mapping, Just in Time, and Kaizen are top-rated risk management approaches. This research’s novelty is identifying and analyzing crucial risk categories, providing the relevant risk management approaches ranked according to efficiency performance, and presenting a decision-making model as a guideline for risk management of modular construction projects.Keywords: Modular constructionrisk managementmulti-criteria decision-makingoff-site constructiondelphi methodconstruction management; analytic hierarchy process Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data used in this study with unique DOIs for the qualitative and quantitative analysis spreadsheets are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":47375,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Construction Management","volume":"33 20","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-criteria decision-making model for risk management in modular construction projects\",\"authors\":\"Sabah Khodabocus, Senem Seyis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15623599.2023.2276649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe modular sector needs a precise guide to determine the most efficient risk management approaches. The main research objective of this study is to develop a multi-criteria decision-making model to find the most efficient risk management approach according to the relevant risk criteria. The risk criteria and risk management approaches for modular construction projects were also identified and classified within this scope. A systematic literature review, semi-structured interviews, and open-ended questionnaires were performed for identification and classification purposes. For ranking and quantifying the identified risks and risk approaches, as well as developing the decision-making model, the Delphi method and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) were conducted. A two-round Delphi method, with eleven experts, was conducted to achieve efficient performance scores of the identified risk management approaches. The percentage standard deviation decreased, Relative Importance Index (RII), Cronbach’s alpha, and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (Kendall’s W) were calculated to ensure the outputs’ reliability, validity, and agreement level. The AHP method opted to quantify the Delphi method outputs, solve the multi-criteria decision-making process, and develop the multi-criteria decision-making model for risk management of modular construction projects. Triangulation results show that the critical risk categories are supply chain, health and safety, stakeholders, and governmental support. Lean principles such as the Last Planner System, Value Stream Mapping, Just in Time, and Kaizen are top-rated risk management approaches. This research’s novelty is identifying and analyzing crucial risk categories, providing the relevant risk management approaches ranked according to efficiency performance, and presenting a decision-making model as a guideline for risk management of modular construction projects.Keywords: Modular constructionrisk managementmulti-criteria decision-makingoff-site constructiondelphi methodconstruction management; analytic hierarchy process Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data used in this study with unique DOIs for the qualitative and quantitative analysis spreadsheets are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Construction Management\",\"volume\":\"33 20\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Construction Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2023.2276649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Construction Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2023.2276649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要模块化领域需要一个精确的指南来确定最有效的风险管理方法。本研究的主要研究目标是建立一个多准则决策模型,根据相关的风险准则寻找最有效的风险管理方法。在此范围内,对模块化建设项目的风险标准和风险管理方法进行了识别和分类。系统的文献回顾,半结构化访谈和开放式问卷调查进行了识别和分类的目的。采用德尔菲法和层次分析法(AHP)对已识别的风险和风险途径进行排序和量化,并建立决策模型。采用由11位专家组成的两轮德尔菲法,对确定的风险管理方法进行了有效的绩效评分。降低百分比标准差,计算相对重要指数(RII)、Cronbach’s alpha和Kendall’s consistency coefficient (Kendall’s W),以保证输出的信度、效度和一致性水平。层次分析法选择对德尔菲法的结果进行量化,解决多准则决策过程,建立模块化建设项目风险管理的多准则决策模型。三角测量结果显示,关键风险类别为供应链、健康与安全、利益相关者和政府支持。精益原则,如最后的计划系统,价值流映射,及时,和改善是最高评级的风险管理方法。本研究的新颖之处在于识别和分析关键风险类别,根据效率绩效提供相应的风险管理方法,并提出决策模型作为模块化建设项目风险管理的指导。关键词:模块化施工;风险管理;多准则决策;披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明本研究中使用的数据具有独特的DOIs用于定性和定量分析电子表格,应合理要求从相应作者处获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-criteria decision-making model for risk management in modular construction projects
AbstractThe modular sector needs a precise guide to determine the most efficient risk management approaches. The main research objective of this study is to develop a multi-criteria decision-making model to find the most efficient risk management approach according to the relevant risk criteria. The risk criteria and risk management approaches for modular construction projects were also identified and classified within this scope. A systematic literature review, semi-structured interviews, and open-ended questionnaires were performed for identification and classification purposes. For ranking and quantifying the identified risks and risk approaches, as well as developing the decision-making model, the Delphi method and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) were conducted. A two-round Delphi method, with eleven experts, was conducted to achieve efficient performance scores of the identified risk management approaches. The percentage standard deviation decreased, Relative Importance Index (RII), Cronbach’s alpha, and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (Kendall’s W) were calculated to ensure the outputs’ reliability, validity, and agreement level. The AHP method opted to quantify the Delphi method outputs, solve the multi-criteria decision-making process, and develop the multi-criteria decision-making model for risk management of modular construction projects. Triangulation results show that the critical risk categories are supply chain, health and safety, stakeholders, and governmental support. Lean principles such as the Last Planner System, Value Stream Mapping, Just in Time, and Kaizen are top-rated risk management approaches. This research’s novelty is identifying and analyzing crucial risk categories, providing the relevant risk management approaches ranked according to efficiency performance, and presenting a decision-making model as a guideline for risk management of modular construction projects.Keywords: Modular constructionrisk managementmulti-criteria decision-makingoff-site constructiondelphi methodconstruction management; analytic hierarchy process Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data used in this study with unique DOIs for the qualitative and quantitative analysis spreadsheets are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
17.90%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Construction Management publishes quality papers aiming to advance the knowledge of construction management. The Journal is devoted to the publication of original research including, but not limited to the following: Sustainable Construction (Green building; Carbon emission; Waste management; Energy saving) Construction life cycle management Construction informatics (Building information modelling; Information communication technology; Virtual design and construction) Smart construction (Robotics; Artificial intelligence; 3D printing) Big data for construction Legal issues in construction Public policies for construction Building and Infrastructures Health, safety and well-being in construction Risk management in construction Disaster management and resilience Construction procurement Construction management education
期刊最新文献
Claims management: a review of challenges faced Limitations of the conventional project delivery (CPD) approach in producing quality design documentation: insights from the Ghanaian construction industry Integrating creating shared value into competitive strategies: case studies of Chinese international construction companies Analysing multifaceted barriers to modular construction in sustainable building projects: a comprehensive evaluation using multi-criteria decision making Determinants of the integrity climate of public organizations – a procurement perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1