控制影响前后的现场实验表明,防捕食者网提高了受威胁的匈牙利草甸蝰蛇(Vipera ursinii rakosiensis)的占用率。

IF 1.7 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY Wildlife Biology Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1002/wlb3.01147
Edvárd Mizsei, Mátyás Budai, Bálint Wenner, Gergő Rák, Dávid Radovics, Barnabás Bancsik, Gergő Kovács, Ádám Tisza, János Simics, Márton Szabolcs, Csaba Vadász, Attila Móré
{"title":"控制影响前后的现场实验表明,防捕食者网提高了受威胁的匈牙利草甸蝰蛇(Vipera ursinii rakosiensis)的占用率。","authors":"Edvárd Mizsei, Mátyás Budai, Bálint Wenner, Gergő Rák, Dávid Radovics, Barnabás Bancsik, Gergő Kovács, Ádám Tisza, János Simics, Márton Szabolcs, Csaba Vadász, Attila Móré","doi":"10.1002/wlb3.01147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Hungarian meadow viper is an endangered grassland‐dwelling species, which faces high predation pressure, partially due to avian species that forage in its habitat. Predation pressure by avian predators is caused not only by abundant game species (e.g. hooded crow, Corvus cornix ) but also by protected and threatened species (e.g. short‐toed eagle, Cricaetus gallicus ; common buzzard, Buteo buteo ; roller, Coracias garrulus ) in the project area (Felső‐kiskunsági turjánvidék, Hungary). Mark–recapture data of a reintroduced viper population showed a very low, 42% yearly average apparent survival rate. To establish a strong sub‐population we applied anti‐predator netting (APN) by building a 200 × 200 × 3 m (4 ha) totally closed exclusion site with a mesh net, lateral sides boosted with a 1 m high steel field fence to exclude mammals as well as birds. To test the effect of APN we monitored viper occupancy at 50 × 50 m sampling plots in a before–after/control–intervention (BACI) design, where we randomly placed quadrats 0.25 ha (50 × 50 m) to be surveyed, n = 26 at control habitats and n = 4 below the APN enclosure. We collected data across four years (2020–2023), in each year during the spring by 10 surveys replicates in each plot resulting in 1200 surveys to record viper detection/non‐detection data. We applied a multi‐season occupancy model to estimate site occupancy changes to test the effects of the BACI design. Occupancy probabilities were increasing during the four consecutive survey years in both the control and the intervention sites, however except for the initial occupancy, the occupancy probability became significantly higher at APN sites, and the APN intervention had a significant positive effect on viper occupancy, while the distance to APN showed negative effect. Predator exclusion is an effective method to minimise predation pressure and potentially has a deterministic positive demographic outcome, however, due to the high logistical and maintenance costs, this measure can be applied at only a few sites.","PeriodicalId":54405,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Before‐after‐control‐impact field experiment shows anti‐predator netting enhances occupancy of the threatened Hungarian meadow viper (<i>Vipera ursinii rakosiensis</i>)\",\"authors\":\"Edvárd Mizsei, Mátyás Budai, Bálint Wenner, Gergő Rák, Dávid Radovics, Barnabás Bancsik, Gergő Kovács, Ádám Tisza, János Simics, Márton Szabolcs, Csaba Vadász, Attila Móré\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wlb3.01147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Hungarian meadow viper is an endangered grassland‐dwelling species, which faces high predation pressure, partially due to avian species that forage in its habitat. Predation pressure by avian predators is caused not only by abundant game species (e.g. hooded crow, Corvus cornix ) but also by protected and threatened species (e.g. short‐toed eagle, Cricaetus gallicus ; common buzzard, Buteo buteo ; roller, Coracias garrulus ) in the project area (Felső‐kiskunsági turjánvidék, Hungary). Mark–recapture data of a reintroduced viper population showed a very low, 42% yearly average apparent survival rate. To establish a strong sub‐population we applied anti‐predator netting (APN) by building a 200 × 200 × 3 m (4 ha) totally closed exclusion site with a mesh net, lateral sides boosted with a 1 m high steel field fence to exclude mammals as well as birds. To test the effect of APN we monitored viper occupancy at 50 × 50 m sampling plots in a before–after/control–intervention (BACI) design, where we randomly placed quadrats 0.25 ha (50 × 50 m) to be surveyed, n = 26 at control habitats and n = 4 below the APN enclosure. We collected data across four years (2020–2023), in each year during the spring by 10 surveys replicates in each plot resulting in 1200 surveys to record viper detection/non‐detection data. We applied a multi‐season occupancy model to estimate site occupancy changes to test the effects of the BACI design. Occupancy probabilities were increasing during the four consecutive survey years in both the control and the intervention sites, however except for the initial occupancy, the occupancy probability became significantly higher at APN sites, and the APN intervention had a significant positive effect on viper occupancy, while the distance to APN showed negative effect. Predator exclusion is an effective method to minimise predation pressure and potentially has a deterministic positive demographic outcome, however, due to the high logistical and maintenance costs, this measure can be applied at only a few sites.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wildlife Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wildlife Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01147\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

匈牙利草地蝰蛇是一种濒临灭绝的草原栖息物种,它面临着很高的捕食压力,部分原因是鸟类在其栖息地觅食。鸟类捕食者的捕食压力不仅是由丰富的狩猎物种(如冠鸦,Corvus cornix)引起的,也由受保护和受威胁的物种(如短趾鹰,Cricaetus gallicus;兀鹰,兀鹰;项目区域(felsser‐kiskunsági turjánvidék,匈牙利)。重新引入的毒蛇种群的标记重新捕获数据显示,年平均表观存活率非常低,为42%。为了建立强大的亚种群,我们采用了防捕食者网(APN),建立了一个200 × 200 × 3米(4公顷)的完全封闭的隔离区,用网状网,侧面用1米高的钢栅栏加强,以排除哺乳动物和鸟类。为了检验APN的效果,我们采用前-后/对照-干预(BACI)设计,在50 × 50 m的采样地块上监测毒蛇的占用情况。我们随机放置0.25 ha (50 × 50 m)的样方进行调查,在对照栖息地n = 26,在APN围栏下方n = 4。我们收集了四年(2020-2023)的数据,每年春季通过10次调查,在每个地块重复进行1200次调查,记录毒蛇检测/未检测数据。我们采用多季节入住率模型来估计场地入住率的变化,以测试BACI设计的效果。在连续4年的调查中,对照组和干预点的毒蛇占用概率均呈上升趋势,但除初始占用外,APN点的毒蛇占用概率显著升高,且APN干预对毒蛇占用有显著的正向影响,而与APN的距离对毒蛇占用有显著的负向影响。排除捕食者是一种有效的方法,可以最大限度地减少捕食者的压力,并且可能具有确定的积极的人口统计结果,然而,由于高后勤和维护成本,这种措施只能在少数地点应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Before‐after‐control‐impact field experiment shows anti‐predator netting enhances occupancy of the threatened Hungarian meadow viper (Vipera ursinii rakosiensis)
The Hungarian meadow viper is an endangered grassland‐dwelling species, which faces high predation pressure, partially due to avian species that forage in its habitat. Predation pressure by avian predators is caused not only by abundant game species (e.g. hooded crow, Corvus cornix ) but also by protected and threatened species (e.g. short‐toed eagle, Cricaetus gallicus ; common buzzard, Buteo buteo ; roller, Coracias garrulus ) in the project area (Felső‐kiskunsági turjánvidék, Hungary). Mark–recapture data of a reintroduced viper population showed a very low, 42% yearly average apparent survival rate. To establish a strong sub‐population we applied anti‐predator netting (APN) by building a 200 × 200 × 3 m (4 ha) totally closed exclusion site with a mesh net, lateral sides boosted with a 1 m high steel field fence to exclude mammals as well as birds. To test the effect of APN we monitored viper occupancy at 50 × 50 m sampling plots in a before–after/control–intervention (BACI) design, where we randomly placed quadrats 0.25 ha (50 × 50 m) to be surveyed, n = 26 at control habitats and n = 4 below the APN enclosure. We collected data across four years (2020–2023), in each year during the spring by 10 surveys replicates in each plot resulting in 1200 surveys to record viper detection/non‐detection data. We applied a multi‐season occupancy model to estimate site occupancy changes to test the effects of the BACI design. Occupancy probabilities were increasing during the four consecutive survey years in both the control and the intervention sites, however except for the initial occupancy, the occupancy probability became significantly higher at APN sites, and the APN intervention had a significant positive effect on viper occupancy, while the distance to APN showed negative effect. Predator exclusion is an effective method to minimise predation pressure and potentially has a deterministic positive demographic outcome, however, due to the high logistical and maintenance costs, this measure can be applied at only a few sites.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wildlife Biology
Wildlife Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: WILDLIFE BIOLOGY is a high-quality scientific forum directing concise and up-to-date information to scientists, administrators, wildlife managers and conservationists. The journal encourages and welcomes original papers, short communications and reviews written in English from throughout the world. The journal accepts theoretical, empirical, and practical articles of high standard from all areas of wildlife science with the primary task of creating the scientific basis for the enhancement of wildlife management practices. Our concept of ''wildlife'' mainly includes mammal and bird species, but studies on other species or phenomena relevant to wildlife management are also of great interest. We adopt a broad concept of wildlife management, including all structures and actions with the purpose of conservation, sustainable use, and/or control of wildlife and its habitats, in order to safeguard sustainable relationships between wildlife and other human interests.
期刊最新文献
Red deer grazing pressure on agricultural grass meadows from broad to local scale Wolf diet in the Notecka Forest, western Poland Where is the wolf? A multi‐method comparison of social values and perceptions in a Swiss park The effects of variability in catch effort on the precision of statistical population reconstruction Reaching and implementing the best available knowledge in wildlife biology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1