#35885“直接进入”门诊病人通道——一项服务审查。一条安全、可持续的通往手术室的通道,包括经由座湾

Gerard Kavanagh, John McDonnell, Brian Kinirons
{"title":"#35885“直接进入”门诊病人通道——一项服务审查。一条安全、可持续的通往手术室的通道,包括经由座湾","authors":"Gerard Kavanagh, John McDonnell, Brian Kinirons","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-esra.392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3></h3> <b>Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted:</b> Not relevant (see information at the bottom of this page) <h3>Background and Aims</h3> Galway University Hospital has an established ambulatory patient pathway governed by a ‘Direct Access’ policy. This was designed to minimise in- hospital time, maximise patient safety and facilitate Trauma and Plastic Surgery procedures. We conducted a review of this service to quantify volume of use, determine adherence to policy guidance and establish the level of Regional Anaesthesia involvement. Our aims are to promote the policy as a safe sustainable model for ambulatory care that maximises patient safety while increasing local Block Bay throughput. <h3>Methods</h3> Operating Theatre records were interrogated to derive the patients recorded as ‘Direct Access’. This was cross-referenced with our Block Bay log to establish patients who were administered a regional block. Electronic records and bed management systems were reviewed to establish adherence to policy in relation to sedation use, conversion to general anaesthesia and length-of-stay. Data was stored within the hospitals network, password protected with vetted select access. Windows Excel was used to process the data. <h3>Results</h3> Of the 261 cases recorded as ‘Direct Access’; 233 were confirmed and included for analysis. Full results are included in attached image of Tables 1-5. Direct Access Pathway Review Abstract: Results Tables <h3>Conclusions</h3> Our review reflects a pathway that minimises in-hospital time as 91% cases admitted and discharged on the same day. Policy adherence is high with very low sedation, GA and Overnight-Admission rates. The overall number of ‘Direct Access’ cases highlights the need for promotion of this pathway locally to increase traffic through our Block Bay which will benefit both patients and Anaesthesia trainees alike. Direct Access service review Results Tables 1-5","PeriodicalId":80519,"journal":{"name":"Archaeologia aeliana, or, Miscellaneous tracts relating to antiquity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"#35885 ‘Direct access’ patient pathway for ambulatory care – a service review. A safe sustainable access route to the operating theatre including via the block bay\",\"authors\":\"Gerard Kavanagh, John McDonnell, Brian Kinirons\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2023-esra.392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3></h3> <b>Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted:</b> Not relevant (see information at the bottom of this page) <h3>Background and Aims</h3> Galway University Hospital has an established ambulatory patient pathway governed by a ‘Direct Access’ policy. This was designed to minimise in- hospital time, maximise patient safety and facilitate Trauma and Plastic Surgery procedures. We conducted a review of this service to quantify volume of use, determine adherence to policy guidance and establish the level of Regional Anaesthesia involvement. Our aims are to promote the policy as a safe sustainable model for ambulatory care that maximises patient safety while increasing local Block Bay throughput. <h3>Methods</h3> Operating Theatre records were interrogated to derive the patients recorded as ‘Direct Access’. This was cross-referenced with our Block Bay log to establish patients who were administered a regional block. Electronic records and bed management systems were reviewed to establish adherence to policy in relation to sedation use, conversion to general anaesthesia and length-of-stay. Data was stored within the hospitals network, password protected with vetted select access. Windows Excel was used to process the data. <h3>Results</h3> Of the 261 cases recorded as ‘Direct Access’; 233 were confirmed and included for analysis. Full results are included in attached image of Tables 1-5. Direct Access Pathway Review Abstract: Results Tables <h3>Conclusions</h3> Our review reflects a pathway that minimises in-hospital time as 91% cases admitted and discharged on the same day. Policy adherence is high with very low sedation, GA and Overnight-Admission rates. The overall number of ‘Direct Access’ cases highlights the need for promotion of this pathway locally to increase traffic through our Block Bay which will benefit both patients and Anaesthesia trainees alike. Direct Access service review Results Tables 1-5\",\"PeriodicalId\":80519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeologia aeliana, or, Miscellaneous tracts relating to antiquity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeologia aeliana, or, Miscellaneous tracts relating to antiquity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-esra.392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeologia aeliana, or, Miscellaneous tracts relating to antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-esra.392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

请确认已申请或批准伦理委员会的批准:不相关(见本页底部的信息)背景和目的高威大学医院建立了一个由“直接访问”政策管理的门诊患者通道。这是为了尽量减少住院时间,最大限度地提高病人的安全,并促进创伤和整形手术程序。我们对这项服务进行了审查,以量化使用量,确定对政策指导的遵守程度,并确定区域麻醉的参与程度。我们的目标是推广这项政策,使其成为一种安全、可持续的门诊护理模式,既能最大限度地保障病人的安全,又能提高Block Bay的吞吐量。方法查阅手术室记录,得出“直接就诊”的患者。这与我们Block Bay的日志进行了交叉比对以确定哪些患者接受了区域阻断治疗。对电子记录和床位管理系统进行了审查,以确定是否遵守有关镇静使用、转全麻和住院时间的政策。数据存储在医院的网络中,密码保护,通过审查选择访问。使用Windows Excel进行数据处理。结果261例记录为“直接访问”的病例;其中233例得到确认并纳入分析。完整结果包含在表1-5的附图中。摘要:结果表结论:我们的综述反映了一种最小化住院时间的途径,91%的病例在同一天入院和出院。政策依从性高,镇静、GA和过夜住院率非常低。“直接通道”的个案总数显示,我们有需要在本地推广这条通道,以增加我们Block Bay的交通量,这对病人和麻醉师学员都有好处。直接访问服务评审结果表1-5
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
#35885 ‘Direct access’ patient pathway for ambulatory care – a service review. A safe sustainable access route to the operating theatre including via the block bay

Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted: Not relevant (see information at the bottom of this page)

Background and Aims

Galway University Hospital has an established ambulatory patient pathway governed by a ‘Direct Access’ policy. This was designed to minimise in- hospital time, maximise patient safety and facilitate Trauma and Plastic Surgery procedures. We conducted a review of this service to quantify volume of use, determine adherence to policy guidance and establish the level of Regional Anaesthesia involvement. Our aims are to promote the policy as a safe sustainable model for ambulatory care that maximises patient safety while increasing local Block Bay throughput.

Methods

Operating Theatre records were interrogated to derive the patients recorded as ‘Direct Access’. This was cross-referenced with our Block Bay log to establish patients who were administered a regional block. Electronic records and bed management systems were reviewed to establish adherence to policy in relation to sedation use, conversion to general anaesthesia and length-of-stay. Data was stored within the hospitals network, password protected with vetted select access. Windows Excel was used to process the data.

Results

Of the 261 cases recorded as ‘Direct Access’; 233 were confirmed and included for analysis. Full results are included in attached image of Tables 1-5. Direct Access Pathway Review Abstract: Results Tables

Conclusions

Our review reflects a pathway that minimises in-hospital time as 91% cases admitted and discharged on the same day. Policy adherence is high with very low sedation, GA and Overnight-Admission rates. The overall number of ‘Direct Access’ cases highlights the need for promotion of this pathway locally to increase traffic through our Block Bay which will benefit both patients and Anaesthesia trainees alike. Direct Access service review Results Tables 1-5
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
#35807 Erector spinae block for percutaneous kyphoplasty anesthetic management in high-risk patients: a case report #35918 A randomized control trial to evaluate the effects of Ketofol versus propofol on cerebral oxygenation in patients undergoing Trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery under total intravenous anesthesia #35931 Regional anaesthesia for intubation and maintenance in myasthenia gravis patient with bilateral renal calculi #34666 Case report: Ablation of renal tumour in high bmi patient under single shot paravertebral and remifentanil #35938 Venovenous ECMO in near fatal ashtma: case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1