教育技术研究中的因果图推理

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Etr&d-Educational Technology Research and Development Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1007/s11423-023-10241-0
Joshua Weidlich, Ben Hicks, Hendrik Drachsler
{"title":"教育技术研究中的因果图推理","authors":"Joshua Weidlich, Ben Hicks, Hendrik Drachsler","doi":"10.1007/s11423-023-10241-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Researchers tasked with understanding the effects of educational technology innovations face the challenge of providing evidence of causality. Given the complexities of studying learning in authentic contexts interwoven with technological affordances, conducting tightly-controlled randomized experiments is not always feasible nor desirable. Today, a set of tools is available that can help researchers reason about cause-and-effect, irrespective of the particular research design or approach. This theoretical paper introduces such a tool, a simple graphical formalism that can be used to reason about potential sources of bias. We further explain how causal graphs differ from structural equation models and highlight the value of explicit causal inference. The final section shows how causal graphs can be used in several stages of the research process, whether researchers plan to conduct observational or experimental research.","PeriodicalId":48170,"journal":{"name":"Etr&d-Educational Technology Research and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal reasoning with causal graphs in educational technology research\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Weidlich, Ben Hicks, Hendrik Drachsler\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11423-023-10241-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Researchers tasked with understanding the effects of educational technology innovations face the challenge of providing evidence of causality. Given the complexities of studying learning in authentic contexts interwoven with technological affordances, conducting tightly-controlled randomized experiments is not always feasible nor desirable. Today, a set of tools is available that can help researchers reason about cause-and-effect, irrespective of the particular research design or approach. This theoretical paper introduces such a tool, a simple graphical formalism that can be used to reason about potential sources of bias. We further explain how causal graphs differ from structural equation models and highlight the value of explicit causal inference. The final section shows how causal graphs can be used in several stages of the research process, whether researchers plan to conduct observational or experimental research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Etr&d-Educational Technology Research and Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Etr&d-Educational Technology Research and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10241-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etr&d-Educational Technology Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10241-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以理解教育技术创新影响为任务的研究人员面临着提供因果关系证据的挑战。考虑到在真实环境中研究与技术支持交织在一起的学习的复杂性,进行严格控制的随机实验并不总是可行或可取的。今天,有一套工具可以帮助研究人员推理因果关系,而不考虑特定的研究设计或方法。这篇理论论文介绍了这样一个工具,一个简单的图形形式,可以用来推断潜在的偏差来源。我们进一步解释了因果图与结构方程模型的不同之处,并强调了显式因果推理的价值。最后一节展示了因果图如何在研究过程的几个阶段中使用,无论研究人员计划进行观察性研究还是实验性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causal reasoning with causal graphs in educational technology research
Abstract Researchers tasked with understanding the effects of educational technology innovations face the challenge of providing evidence of causality. Given the complexities of studying learning in authentic contexts interwoven with technological affordances, conducting tightly-controlled randomized experiments is not always feasible nor desirable. Today, a set of tools is available that can help researchers reason about cause-and-effect, irrespective of the particular research design or approach. This theoretical paper introduces such a tool, a simple graphical formalism that can be used to reason about potential sources of bias. We further explain how causal graphs differ from structural equation models and highlight the value of explicit causal inference. The final section shows how causal graphs can be used in several stages of the research process, whether researchers plan to conduct observational or experimental research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Etr&d-Educational Technology Research and Development
Etr&d-Educational Technology Research and Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Educational Technology Research and Development is the only scholarly journal in the field focusing entirely on research and development in educational technology. The Research Section assigns highest priority in reviewing manuscripts to rigorous original quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods studies on topics relating to applications of technology or instructional design in educational settings. Such contexts include K-12, higher education, and adult learning (e.g., in corporate training settings). Analytical papers that evaluate important research issues related to educational technology research and reviews of the literature on similar topics are also published. This section features well-documented articles on the practical aspects of research as well as applied theory in educational practice and provides a comprehensive source of current research information in instructional technology. The Development Section publishes research on planning, implementation, evaluation and management of a variety of instructional technologies and learning environments. Empirically based formative evaluations and theoretically based instructional design research papers are welcome, as are papers that report outcomes of innovative approaches in applying technology to instructional development. Papers for the Development section may involve a variety of research methods and should focus on one aspect of the instructional development process or more; when relevant and possible, papers should discuss the implications of instructional design decisions and provide evidence linking outcomes to those decisions. The Cultural and Regional Perspectives Section (formerly International Review) welcome s innovative research about how technologies are being used to enhance learning, instruction, and performance specific to a culture or region. Educational technology studies submitted to this section should be situated in cultural contexts that critically examine issues and ideologies prevalent in the culture or region or by individuals or groups in the culture or region. Theoretical perspectives can be broadly based and inclusive of research, such as critical race theory, cultural-historical activity theory, and cultural models. Papers published in this section include quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods articles and reviews drawing on relevant theories, empirical evidence, and critical analyses of the findings, implications, and conclusions within a cultural context. Educational Technology Research and Development publishes special issues on timely topics of interest to the community, in addition to regular papers.
期刊最新文献
Exploring online authentic learning environment (OnALE) for inferential statistics: its efficacy and benefits to statistics learners Transforming teachers’ self-narratives about game-based learning Learning experience design (LXD) professional competencies: an exploratory job announcement analysis Conceptual and theoretical frameworks for leveraging makerspaces to encourage and retain underrepresented populations in STEM through learning by design Design principles to develop digital innovation skills: a design-based research approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1