高维篮子期权的有效定价与校准

IF 1.7 4区 数学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED International Journal of Computer Mathematics Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1080/00207160.2023.2266051
Lech A. Grzelak, Juliusz Jablecki, Dariusz Gatarek
{"title":"高维篮子期权的有效定价与校准","authors":"Lech A. Grzelak, Juliusz Jablecki, Dariusz Gatarek","doi":"10.1080/00207160.2023.2266051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis paper studies equity basket options – i.e. multi-dimensional derivatives whose payoffs depend on the value of a weighted sum of the underlying stocks – and develops a new and innovative approach to ensure consistency between options on individual stocks and on the index comprising them. Specifically, we show how to resolve a well-known problem that when individual constituent distributions of an equity index are inferred from the single-stock option markets and combined in a multi-dimensional local/stochastic volatility model, the resulting basket option prices will not generate a skew matching that of the options on the equity index corresponding to the basket. To address this “insufficient skewness”, we proceed in two steps. First, we propose an “effective” local volatility model by mapping the general multi-dimensional basket onto a collection of marginal distributions. Second, we build a multivariate dependence structure between all the marginal distributions assuming a jump-diffusion model for the effective projection parameters, and show how to calibrate the basket to the index smile. Numerical tests and calibration exercises demonstrate an excellent fit for a basket of as many as 30 stocks with fast calculation time.Keywords: Basket OptionsIndex SkewMonte CarloLocal VolatilityStochastic VolatilityCollocation MethodsDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. Notes1 Cf. the prospectus availible in the online records of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000089109221003578/e13291-424b2.htm2 For example, in the Bloomberg basket options pricing template correlations are, by default, estimated over a 5 year period, whereby to eliminate noise, a given percentile of rolling 6-month cross-correlation estimates is chosen in the parameterization of the full correlation matrix.3 We define the skew here loosely as the difference in implied volatilities between the 85-120% ATM levels.4 As an alternative to [27] one could consider Kou's jump-diffusion model [18] which has the additional benefit of separating the upside and downside skew. However, in this case, we opt for the simplicity and parsimony of Merton's approach5 Without loss of generality, we shall henceforth think of the underlying assets as stocks, however the method developed below is obviously general and, mutatis mutandis, applies to other instruments as well.6 The proposed framework can also be extended with a stochastic volatility process. Such an extension is trivial and will, for simplicity, be omitted.7 The respective dynamics are given by (j=1,2): dSj(t)=rSj(t)dt+vj1/2(t)Sj(t)dWj,1(t), dvj(t)=κj(v¯j−vj(t))dt+γjvj1/2(t)dWj,2(t) with correlations dWj,1(t)dWj,2(t)=ρjdt, dW1,1(t)dW2,1(t)=ρ1,2dt and dWj,2(t)dWk,2(t)=0⋅dt. For reference, we set S1(t0)=1, S2(t0)=2.5, r=0, κ1=1, κ2=0.5, γ1=1, γ2=0.6, ρS1,v1=−0.5, ρS2,v2=−0.7, v1,0=0.1, v2,0=0.05, v¯1=0.1 and v¯2=0.05.8 The Feller's condition is a direct consequence of the so-called Fichera [11] condition for the uniqueness of solutions to elliptic and parabolic equations having diffusion coefficients vanishing on the boundary of the computational domain. It gives necessary and sufficient conditions for advection terms guaranteeing the unicity of solutions.9 The reason why we choose a standard normal distribution in the alternative approach is twofold. First, even for a fundamental distribution as the standard normal results are highly accurate – this is also the case in e.g. [12]. By choosing a different distribution, results may be further enhanced. Secondly, as mentioned in [14], choosing the normal distribution is also motivated by the Cameron-Martin Theorem [30], which states that polynomial chaos approximations based on the normal distribution converge to any distribution.10 The strategy proposed in this part does not require “re-calibration” of αi,j,k coefficients, but only neglects the coefficients of higher order.11 1) UnitedHealth; 2) Home Depot; 3) Goldman Sachs; 4) Microsoft Corp; 5) salesforce.com Inc12 Results for σ are not presented here as they resembled the impacts of ξp and σJ","PeriodicalId":13911,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient Pricing and Calibration of High-Dimensional Basket Options\",\"authors\":\"Lech A. Grzelak, Juliusz Jablecki, Dariusz Gatarek\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00207160.2023.2266051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThis paper studies equity basket options – i.e. multi-dimensional derivatives whose payoffs depend on the value of a weighted sum of the underlying stocks – and develops a new and innovative approach to ensure consistency between options on individual stocks and on the index comprising them. Specifically, we show how to resolve a well-known problem that when individual constituent distributions of an equity index are inferred from the single-stock option markets and combined in a multi-dimensional local/stochastic volatility model, the resulting basket option prices will not generate a skew matching that of the options on the equity index corresponding to the basket. To address this “insufficient skewness”, we proceed in two steps. First, we propose an “effective” local volatility model by mapping the general multi-dimensional basket onto a collection of marginal distributions. Second, we build a multivariate dependence structure between all the marginal distributions assuming a jump-diffusion model for the effective projection parameters, and show how to calibrate the basket to the index smile. Numerical tests and calibration exercises demonstrate an excellent fit for a basket of as many as 30 stocks with fast calculation time.Keywords: Basket OptionsIndex SkewMonte CarloLocal VolatilityStochastic VolatilityCollocation MethodsDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. Notes1 Cf. the prospectus availible in the online records of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000089109221003578/e13291-424b2.htm2 For example, in the Bloomberg basket options pricing template correlations are, by default, estimated over a 5 year period, whereby to eliminate noise, a given percentile of rolling 6-month cross-correlation estimates is chosen in the parameterization of the full correlation matrix.3 We define the skew here loosely as the difference in implied volatilities between the 85-120% ATM levels.4 As an alternative to [27] one could consider Kou's jump-diffusion model [18] which has the additional benefit of separating the upside and downside skew. However, in this case, we opt for the simplicity and parsimony of Merton's approach5 Without loss of generality, we shall henceforth think of the underlying assets as stocks, however the method developed below is obviously general and, mutatis mutandis, applies to other instruments as well.6 The proposed framework can also be extended with a stochastic volatility process. Such an extension is trivial and will, for simplicity, be omitted.7 The respective dynamics are given by (j=1,2): dSj(t)=rSj(t)dt+vj1/2(t)Sj(t)dWj,1(t), dvj(t)=κj(v¯j−vj(t))dt+γjvj1/2(t)dWj,2(t) with correlations dWj,1(t)dWj,2(t)=ρjdt, dW1,1(t)dW2,1(t)=ρ1,2dt and dWj,2(t)dWk,2(t)=0⋅dt. For reference, we set S1(t0)=1, S2(t0)=2.5, r=0, κ1=1, κ2=0.5, γ1=1, γ2=0.6, ρS1,v1=−0.5, ρS2,v2=−0.7, v1,0=0.1, v2,0=0.05, v¯1=0.1 and v¯2=0.05.8 The Feller's condition is a direct consequence of the so-called Fichera [11] condition for the uniqueness of solutions to elliptic and parabolic equations having diffusion coefficients vanishing on the boundary of the computational domain. It gives necessary and sufficient conditions for advection terms guaranteeing the unicity of solutions.9 The reason why we choose a standard normal distribution in the alternative approach is twofold. First, even for a fundamental distribution as the standard normal results are highly accurate – this is also the case in e.g. [12]. By choosing a different distribution, results may be further enhanced. Secondly, as mentioned in [14], choosing the normal distribution is also motivated by the Cameron-Martin Theorem [30], which states that polynomial chaos approximations based on the normal distribution converge to any distribution.10 The strategy proposed in this part does not require “re-calibration” of αi,j,k coefficients, but only neglects the coefficients of higher order.11 1) UnitedHealth; 2) Home Depot; 3) Goldman Sachs; 4) Microsoft Corp; 5) salesforce.com Inc12 Results for σ are not presented here as they resembled the impacts of ξp and σJ\",\"PeriodicalId\":13911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computer Mathematics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computer Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2023.2266051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2023.2266051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文研究了股票篮子期权,即其收益取决于标的股票加权和价值的多维衍生品,并提出了一种新的创新方法来确保个股期权与构成个股期权的指数之间的一致性。具体来说,我们展示了如何解决一个众所周知的问题,即当从单一股票期权市场推断出股票指数的各个成分分布并将其组合在多维局部/随机波动率模型中时,所得的一篮子期权价格不会产生与该篮子对应的股票指数期权价格相匹配的偏态。为了解决这个“不充分的偏度”,我们分两个步骤进行。首先,我们提出了一个“有效”的局部波动率模型,将一般多维篮子映射到边际分布的集合上。其次,假设有效投影参数为跳跃-扩散模型,建立了所有边缘分布之间的多元依赖结构,并展示了如何将篮子校准到指数微笑。数值测试和校准练习证明了一个非常适合的篮子多达30股与快速计算时间。关键词:篮子期权指数偏差蒙特卡罗局部波动随机波动搭配方法免责声明作为对作者和研究人员的服务,我们提供此版本的接受稿件(AM)。在最终出版版本记录(VoR)之前,将对该手稿进行编辑、排版和审查。在制作和印前,可能会发现可能影响内容的错误,所有适用于期刊的法律免责声明也与这些版本有关。注1参见美国证券交易委员会在线记录的招股说明书:https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000089109221003578/e13291-424b2.htm2例如,在彭博一篮子期权定价模板中,默认情况下,相关性是在5年期间估计的,因此为了消除噪声,在完整相关矩阵的参数化中选择滚动6个月交叉相关估计的给定百分位数我们将这里的倾斜定义为85-120% ATM水平之间隐含波动率的差异作为[27]的替代方案,可以考虑Kou的跳跃-扩散模型[18],该模型具有分离上下倾斜的额外好处。然而,在这种情况下,我们选择默顿方法的简单性和简洁性。5在不失一般性的情况下,我们今后将把标的资产视为股票,然而,下面开发的方法显然是一般性的,而且在必要时也适用于其他金融工具所提出的框架也可以扩展为随机波动过程。这样的扩展是微不足道的,为了简单起见,将被省略各自的动力学由(j=1,2)给出:dSj(t)=rSj(t)dt+vj1/2(t)Sj(t)dWj,1(t), dvj(t)=κj(v¯j−vj(t))dt+γjvj1/2(t)dWj,2(t)关联dWj,1(t)dWj,2(t)=ρjdt, dW1,1(t) dWj,2(t)= 0·dt。作为参考,我们设S1(t0)=1, S2(t0)=2.5, r=0, κ1=1, κ2=0.5, γ1=1, γ2=0.6, ρS1,v1= - 0.5, ρS2,v2= - 0.7, v1,0=0.1, v2,0=0.05, v¯1=0.1和v¯2=0.05.8。Feller条件是所谓的Fichera[11]条件的直接结果,用于计算域边界上扩散系数消失的椭圆型和抛物型方程解的唯一性。给出了平流项保证解唯一性的充分必要条件我们选择标准正态分布的原因有两个。首先,即使是作为标准正态分布的基本分布,其结果也是高度准确的——例如[12]中的情况也是如此。通过选择不同的分布,结果可能会进一步增强。其次,如[14]所述,选择正态分布也是受到Cameron-Martin定理[30]的启发,该定理指出基于正态分布的多项式混沌近似收敛于任何分布10本部分提出的策略不需要对αi,j,k系数进行“重新校准”,只忽略高阶系数。11)联合健康;2)家得宝;3)高盛(Goldman Sachs);4)微软公司;5) salesforce.com Inc12的结果在这里没有给出,因为它们类似于ξp和σ j的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficient Pricing and Calibration of High-Dimensional Basket Options
AbstractThis paper studies equity basket options – i.e. multi-dimensional derivatives whose payoffs depend on the value of a weighted sum of the underlying stocks – and develops a new and innovative approach to ensure consistency between options on individual stocks and on the index comprising them. Specifically, we show how to resolve a well-known problem that when individual constituent distributions of an equity index are inferred from the single-stock option markets and combined in a multi-dimensional local/stochastic volatility model, the resulting basket option prices will not generate a skew matching that of the options on the equity index corresponding to the basket. To address this “insufficient skewness”, we proceed in two steps. First, we propose an “effective” local volatility model by mapping the general multi-dimensional basket onto a collection of marginal distributions. Second, we build a multivariate dependence structure between all the marginal distributions assuming a jump-diffusion model for the effective projection parameters, and show how to calibrate the basket to the index smile. Numerical tests and calibration exercises demonstrate an excellent fit for a basket of as many as 30 stocks with fast calculation time.Keywords: Basket OptionsIndex SkewMonte CarloLocal VolatilityStochastic VolatilityCollocation MethodsDisclaimerAs a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also. Notes1 Cf. the prospectus availible in the online records of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/19617/000089109221003578/e13291-424b2.htm2 For example, in the Bloomberg basket options pricing template correlations are, by default, estimated over a 5 year period, whereby to eliminate noise, a given percentile of rolling 6-month cross-correlation estimates is chosen in the parameterization of the full correlation matrix.3 We define the skew here loosely as the difference in implied volatilities between the 85-120% ATM levels.4 As an alternative to [27] one could consider Kou's jump-diffusion model [18] which has the additional benefit of separating the upside and downside skew. However, in this case, we opt for the simplicity and parsimony of Merton's approach5 Without loss of generality, we shall henceforth think of the underlying assets as stocks, however the method developed below is obviously general and, mutatis mutandis, applies to other instruments as well.6 The proposed framework can also be extended with a stochastic volatility process. Such an extension is trivial and will, for simplicity, be omitted.7 The respective dynamics are given by (j=1,2): dSj(t)=rSj(t)dt+vj1/2(t)Sj(t)dWj,1(t), dvj(t)=κj(v¯j−vj(t))dt+γjvj1/2(t)dWj,2(t) with correlations dWj,1(t)dWj,2(t)=ρjdt, dW1,1(t)dW2,1(t)=ρ1,2dt and dWj,2(t)dWk,2(t)=0⋅dt. For reference, we set S1(t0)=1, S2(t0)=2.5, r=0, κ1=1, κ2=0.5, γ1=1, γ2=0.6, ρS1,v1=−0.5, ρS2,v2=−0.7, v1,0=0.1, v2,0=0.05, v¯1=0.1 and v¯2=0.05.8 The Feller's condition is a direct consequence of the so-called Fichera [11] condition for the uniqueness of solutions to elliptic and parabolic equations having diffusion coefficients vanishing on the boundary of the computational domain. It gives necessary and sufficient conditions for advection terms guaranteeing the unicity of solutions.9 The reason why we choose a standard normal distribution in the alternative approach is twofold. First, even for a fundamental distribution as the standard normal results are highly accurate – this is also the case in e.g. [12]. By choosing a different distribution, results may be further enhanced. Secondly, as mentioned in [14], choosing the normal distribution is also motivated by the Cameron-Martin Theorem [30], which states that polynomial chaos approximations based on the normal distribution converge to any distribution.10 The strategy proposed in this part does not require “re-calibration” of αi,j,k coefficients, but only neglects the coefficients of higher order.11 1) UnitedHealth; 2) Home Depot; 3) Goldman Sachs; 4) Microsoft Corp; 5) salesforce.com Inc12 Results for σ are not presented here as they resembled the impacts of ξp and σJ
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Computer Mathematics (IJCM) is a world-leading journal serving the community of researchers in numerical analysis and scientific computing from academia to industry. IJCM publishes original research papers of high scientific value in fields of computational mathematics with profound applications to science and engineering. IJCM welcomes papers on the analysis and applications of innovative computational strategies as well as those with rigorous explorations of cutting-edge techniques and concerns in computational mathematics. Topics IJCM considers include: • Numerical solutions of systems of partial differential equations • Numerical solution of systems or of multi-dimensional partial differential equations • Theory and computations of nonlocal modelling and fractional partial differential equations • Novel multi-scale modelling and computational strategies • Parallel computations • Numerical optimization and controls • Imaging algorithms and vision configurations • Computational stochastic processes and inverse problems • Stochastic partial differential equations, Monte Carlo simulations and uncertainty quantification • Computational finance and applications • Highly vibrant and robust algorithms, and applications in modern industries, including but not limited to multi-physics, economics and biomedicine. Papers discussing only variations or combinations of existing methods without significant new computational properties or analysis are not of interest to IJCM. Please note that research in the development of computer systems and theory of computing are not suitable for submission to IJCM. Please instead consider International Journal of Computer Mathematics: Computer Systems Theory (IJCM: CST) for your manuscript. Please note that any papers submitted relating to these fields will be transferred to IJCM:CST. Please ensure you submit your paper to the correct journal to save time reviewing and processing your work. Papers developed from Conference Proceedings Please note that papers developed from conference proceedings or previously published work must contain at least 40% new material and significantly extend or improve upon earlier research in order to be considered for IJCM.
期刊最新文献
On frame diagonalization of square matrices Convergence of Runge–Kutta-based convolution quadrature for semilinear fractional differential equations Numerical investigation of the mesh-free collocation approach for solving third kind VIEs with nonlinear vanishing delays A novel coupled p(x) and fractional PDE denoising model with theoretical results Projection and modified projection methods for nonlinear Hammerstein integral equations on the real line using Hermite polynomials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1