超越标签:细分Z世代市场,进行更有效的营销

IF 3.5 Q2 BUSINESS Young Consumers Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1108/yc-03-2023-1707
Joeri Van den Bergh, Patrick De Pelsmacker, Ben Worsley
{"title":"超越标签:细分Z世代市场,进行更有效的营销","authors":"Joeri Van den Bergh, Patrick De Pelsmacker, Ben Worsley","doi":"10.1108/yc-03-2023-1707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify segments in the Gen Z population (born between 1996 and 2010) in Europe, the USA and Australia, based on brand- and lifestyle-related variables and perceptions about their online activities. This study explores how these segments differ and provide insights into cross-country similarities and differences. Design/methodology/approach An online survey was conducted with 4,304 participants, and cluster analysis and analysis of variance were used to identify and profile Gen Z segments in each of three geographical areas. Findings Five segments in Europe and four segments in the USA and in Australia were identified. Segments differ in terms of the importance they attach to exclusivity, inclusivity and sustainability of brands, how Gen Z members perceive money issues and stand in life and how they perceive their online activities. Similar segments are found in the three geographical areas. Research limitations/implications This study proposes a conceptual and analytical approach for exploring intra-cohort diversity. Future research can apply this approach to different generational cohorts and use it to study intra-cohort diversity in other parts of the world. Practical implications This study provides input for marketing practitioners to create better focused and more effective campaigns. Originality/value Cross-country generational cohort research is scarce, and especially intra-cohort diversity is under-researched. This study offers a deep and fine-grained insight into the diversity of the Gen Z cohort across three geographical areas, based on representative samples in these areas.","PeriodicalId":46660,"journal":{"name":"Young Consumers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond labels: segmenting the Gen Z market for more effective marketing\",\"authors\":\"Joeri Van den Bergh, Patrick De Pelsmacker, Ben Worsley\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/yc-03-2023-1707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify segments in the Gen Z population (born between 1996 and 2010) in Europe, the USA and Australia, based on brand- and lifestyle-related variables and perceptions about their online activities. This study explores how these segments differ and provide insights into cross-country similarities and differences. Design/methodology/approach An online survey was conducted with 4,304 participants, and cluster analysis and analysis of variance were used to identify and profile Gen Z segments in each of three geographical areas. Findings Five segments in Europe and four segments in the USA and in Australia were identified. Segments differ in terms of the importance they attach to exclusivity, inclusivity and sustainability of brands, how Gen Z members perceive money issues and stand in life and how they perceive their online activities. Similar segments are found in the three geographical areas. Research limitations/implications This study proposes a conceptual and analytical approach for exploring intra-cohort diversity. Future research can apply this approach to different generational cohorts and use it to study intra-cohort diversity in other parts of the world. Practical implications This study provides input for marketing practitioners to create better focused and more effective campaigns. Originality/value Cross-country generational cohort research is scarce, and especially intra-cohort diversity is under-researched. This study offers a deep and fine-grained insight into the diversity of the Gen Z cohort across three geographical areas, based on representative samples in these areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Young Consumers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Young Consumers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-03-2023-1707\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Young Consumers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-03-2023-1707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是根据品牌和生活方式相关的变量以及对他们在线活动的看法,确定欧洲、美国和澳大利亚Z世代人口(1996年至2010年出生)的细分市场。这项研究探讨了这些细分市场的不同之处,并提供了跨国异同的见解。设计/方法/方法对4304名参与者进行了在线调查,并使用聚类分析和方差分析来识别和描述三个地理区域的Z世代人群。发现在欧洲有5个节段,在美国和澳大利亚有4个节段。不同群体对品牌的排他性、包容性和可持续性的重视程度不同,Z世代成员如何看待金钱问题和生活中的地位,以及他们如何看待自己的在线活动。在这三个地理区域也发现了类似的片段。本研究提出了一种概念和分析方法来探索队列内多样性。未来的研究可以将这种方法应用于不同世代的队列,并将其用于研究世界其他地区的队列内多样性。实践启示本研究为市场营销从业者创造更有针对性和更有效的营销活动提供了输入。跨国家代际队列研究很少,尤其是对内部队列多样性的研究不足。这项研究基于三个地理区域的代表性样本,对Z世代群体的多样性提供了深入而细致的洞察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond labels: segmenting the Gen Z market for more effective marketing
Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify segments in the Gen Z population (born between 1996 and 2010) in Europe, the USA and Australia, based on brand- and lifestyle-related variables and perceptions about their online activities. This study explores how these segments differ and provide insights into cross-country similarities and differences. Design/methodology/approach An online survey was conducted with 4,304 participants, and cluster analysis and analysis of variance were used to identify and profile Gen Z segments in each of three geographical areas. Findings Five segments in Europe and four segments in the USA and in Australia were identified. Segments differ in terms of the importance they attach to exclusivity, inclusivity and sustainability of brands, how Gen Z members perceive money issues and stand in life and how they perceive their online activities. Similar segments are found in the three geographical areas. Research limitations/implications This study proposes a conceptual and analytical approach for exploring intra-cohort diversity. Future research can apply this approach to different generational cohorts and use it to study intra-cohort diversity in other parts of the world. Practical implications This study provides input for marketing practitioners to create better focused and more effective campaigns. Originality/value Cross-country generational cohort research is scarce, and especially intra-cohort diversity is under-researched. This study offers a deep and fine-grained insight into the diversity of the Gen Z cohort across three geographical areas, based on representative samples in these areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Young Consumers
Young Consumers BUSINESS-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
“Do you practice what you preach?” The effects of celebrities’ pro-environmental messages on social media on young adults’ pro-environmental behavior Environmental sustainability in the digital age: unraveling the effect of social media on green purchase intention Drivers of consumer trust in mHealth apps among young consumers: a socio-technical approach Do business-wide sustainability labels boost consumer trust and enhance perceptions of sustainability information quality? An experiment among Z-generation members How does the influencers' country of origin affect online brand advocacy among young consumers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1