理解国际商务中的社会政治风险:拥抱复杂性的配置方法

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of International Management Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1016/j.intman.2023.101066
Thomas C. Lawton , Maria Andrea De Villa , Sandra Milena Santamaria-Alvarez
{"title":"理解国际商务中的社会政治风险:拥抱复杂性的配置方法","authors":"Thomas C. Lawton ,&nbsp;Maria Andrea De Villa ,&nbsp;Sandra Milena Santamaria-Alvarez","doi":"10.1016/j.intman.2023.101066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As social and political contexts have become major sources of uncertainty for international business, we have witnessed renewed efforts to study the impact of socio-political risks on multinational enterprises. However, predominant methods in the field of international business are, for the most part, limited in their capacity to directly address the complexity intrinsic to socio-political risks. We propose overcoming this limitation by adopting a configurational approach that enables researchers to embrace the complexity of socio-political risks in international business. We explain the fundamental principles of a configurational approach and the typical stages for using its methodological tool, Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). We then outline how scholars can use QCA to pursue future research avenues that identify the configurations of conditions that constitute socio-political risks or the effects of socio-political risks on diverse outcomes of interest. We also clarify how the international business field can benefit from the use of QCA in the study of socio-political risks by advancing knowledge of international business in emerging and informal markets, where data access is limited. These efforts aim to motivate international business and management scholars to broaden their empirical toolbox for the study of socio-political risks by engaging in configurational thinking and theorizing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Management","volume":"30 2","pages":"Article 101066"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making Sense of Socio-Political Risks in International Business: A Configurational Approach to Embracing Complexity\",\"authors\":\"Thomas C. Lawton ,&nbsp;Maria Andrea De Villa ,&nbsp;Sandra Milena Santamaria-Alvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intman.2023.101066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As social and political contexts have become major sources of uncertainty for international business, we have witnessed renewed efforts to study the impact of socio-political risks on multinational enterprises. However, predominant methods in the field of international business are, for the most part, limited in their capacity to directly address the complexity intrinsic to socio-political risks. We propose overcoming this limitation by adopting a configurational approach that enables researchers to embrace the complexity of socio-political risks in international business. We explain the fundamental principles of a configurational approach and the typical stages for using its methodological tool, Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). We then outline how scholars can use QCA to pursue future research avenues that identify the configurations of conditions that constitute socio-political risks or the effects of socio-political risks on diverse outcomes of interest. We also clarify how the international business field can benefit from the use of QCA in the study of socio-political risks by advancing knowledge of international business in emerging and informal markets, where data access is limited. These efforts aim to motivate international business and management scholars to broaden their empirical toolbox for the study of socio-political risks by engaging in configurational thinking and theorizing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Management\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101066\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425323000637\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425323000637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着社会和政治环境成为国际商业不确定性的主要来源,我们目睹了研究社会政治风险对跨国企业影响的新努力。然而,国际商务领域的主流方法大多在直接应对社会政治风险内在复杂性方面能力有限。我们建议采用一种配置方法来克服这一局限性,使研究人员能够把握国际商务中社会政治风险的复杂性。我们解释了配置法的基本原则以及使用其方法工具--定性比较分析(QCA)的典型阶段。然后,我们概述了学者们如何利用定性比较分析来寻求未来的研究途径,以确定构成社会政治风险的条件组合或社会政治风险对各种相关结果的影响。我们还阐明了国际商务领域如何从社会政治风险研究中使用 QCA 中获益,推进对新兴市场和非正规市场国际商务的了解,因为这些市场的数据获取途径有限。这些努力旨在激励国际商务和管理学者通过参与构型思考和理论研究,拓宽他们研究社会政治风险的经验工具箱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making Sense of Socio-Political Risks in International Business: A Configurational Approach to Embracing Complexity

As social and political contexts have become major sources of uncertainty for international business, we have witnessed renewed efforts to study the impact of socio-political risks on multinational enterprises. However, predominant methods in the field of international business are, for the most part, limited in their capacity to directly address the complexity intrinsic to socio-political risks. We propose overcoming this limitation by adopting a configurational approach that enables researchers to embrace the complexity of socio-political risks in international business. We explain the fundamental principles of a configurational approach and the typical stages for using its methodological tool, Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). We then outline how scholars can use QCA to pursue future research avenues that identify the configurations of conditions that constitute socio-political risks or the effects of socio-political risks on diverse outcomes of interest. We also clarify how the international business field can benefit from the use of QCA in the study of socio-political risks by advancing knowledge of international business in emerging and informal markets, where data access is limited. These efforts aim to motivate international business and management scholars to broaden their empirical toolbox for the study of socio-political risks by engaging in configurational thinking and theorizing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.80%
发文量
67
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Management is devoted to advancing an understanding of issues in the management of global enterprises, global management theory, and practice; and providing theoretical and managerial implications useful for the further development of research. It is designed to serve an audience of academic researchers and educators, as well as business professionals, by publishing both theoretical and empirical research relating to international management and strategy issues. JIM publishes theoretical and empirical research addressing international business strategy, comparative and cross-cultural management, risk management, organizational behavior, and human resource management, among others.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial on Doing business in Africa: Navigating opportunities and challenges in Africa's emerging markets Global strategy evolution, devolution or revolution: Disruptions to globalization and international business introversion When Global is Not Enough: Applying a Paradox Lens to Sustainability Transitions in Interorganizational Systems The joint effects of institutional logic multiplicity and distance on within-MNE CSR performance differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1