T-557/20单分辨率板v EDPB:关于可识别性的解释

Q3 Social Sciences European Data Protection Law Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.21552/edpl/2023/3/16
S. Reddy Degalahal
{"title":"T-557/20单分辨率板v EDPB:关于可识别性的解释","authors":"S. Reddy Degalahal","doi":"10.21552/edpl/2023/3/16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Case T-557/20 Single Resolution Board v European Data Protection Supervisor (ECLI:EU:T:2023:219) Based on existing case law, the General Court provides guidance on the examination of the concept of identifiability for the definition of personal data under Article 3(1) of Regulation 2018/17251. The Court has provided clarity with respect to determining the possibility of re-identification of pseudonymised data that has been transferred to a third party with no access to the code key. The possibility of re-identification has to be determined from the perspective of the party that doesn’t have the code key and to whom the data has been transferred to by the data controller.","PeriodicalId":36819,"journal":{"name":"European Data Protection Law Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"T-557/20 Single Resolution Board v EDPB: On the Interpretation of Identifiability\",\"authors\":\"S. Reddy Degalahal\",\"doi\":\"10.21552/edpl/2023/3/16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Case T-557/20 Single Resolution Board v European Data Protection Supervisor (ECLI:EU:T:2023:219) Based on existing case law, the General Court provides guidance on the examination of the concept of identifiability for the definition of personal data under Article 3(1) of Regulation 2018/17251. The Court has provided clarity with respect to determining the possibility of re-identification of pseudonymised data that has been transferred to a third party with no access to the code key. The possibility of re-identification has to be determined from the perspective of the party that doesn’t have the code key and to whom the data has been transferred to by the data controller.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Data Protection Law Review\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Data Protection Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2023/3/16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Data Protection Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2023/3/16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

案例T-557/20单一决议委员会诉欧洲数据保护监督者(ECLI:EU:T: 2013:219)基于现有判例法,普通法院就2018/17251号法规第3(1)条下个人数据定义的可识别性概念的审查提供了指导。法院在确定重新识别已转移给无法获得代码密钥的第三方的假名数据的可能性方面提供了明确的说明。重新识别的可能性必须从没有代码密钥的一方的角度来确定,数据控制器将数据传输给了谁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
T-557/20 Single Resolution Board v EDPB: On the Interpretation of Identifiability
Case T-557/20 Single Resolution Board v European Data Protection Supervisor (ECLI:EU:T:2023:219) Based on existing case law, the General Court provides guidance on the examination of the concept of identifiability for the definition of personal data under Article 3(1) of Regulation 2018/17251. The Court has provided clarity with respect to determining the possibility of re-identification of pseudonymised data that has been transferred to a third party with no access to the code key. The possibility of re-identification has to be determined from the perspective of the party that doesn’t have the code key and to whom the data has been transferred to by the data controller.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Data Brokers and European Digital Legislation Data Protection Rights for Legal Persons European Union ∙ The E-Evidence Package is Adopted: End of a Saga or Beginning of a New One? Data Governance Act: On International Transfers of Non-Personal Data and GDPR Mimesis Decision-Making Practices in Transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1