《蛇怪与贝奥武夫:盎格鲁-撒克逊世界的怪物》作者:Tim Flight

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/cjm.2023.a912689
Scott Royle
{"title":"《蛇怪与贝奥武夫:盎格鲁-撒克逊世界的怪物》作者:Tim Flight","authors":"Scott Royle","doi":"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World by Tim Flight Scott Royle Tim Flight, Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World (London: Reaktion, 2021), 262 pp., 20 ills. The first book by author Tim Flight, Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World, is a look into the various diabolic creatures that shared the land with the Anglo-Saxon peoples of medieval Britain. Flight presents a clear investigation of the origins, social utility, and Christian adoption of the various creatures that were said to plague the lands of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, including wolves, dragons, demons, and humanoids. The author takes special care to evidence how these monsters, and their homes, still influence our misunderstandings of the “other” and an ongoing weariness of the wild. After a very concise introduction, which includes pertinent historical remarks on Anglo-Saxon history, Flight’s first chapter, “The Map of Monsters,” geographically situates the coming chapters by providing an overview of the locations and habitations of monsters through both Graeco-Roman and Old English textual references, notably from The Wonders of the East, The Letters of Alexander to Aristotle, and the Liber monstrorum. It is in this section that the author demonstrates that a clear division between a civilized and uncivilized world existed in the cultures that influenced the Anglo-Saxons and that they readily adopted this division. As evidenced in their own writings, monsters were as much a part of the scenery for the Anglo-Saxons as any other natural wonder with “monsters [forming] part of the natural fauna of uncivilized places at the edge of the world” (61). In chapter 2, “Of Wolf and Man,” and chapter 3, “Hic Sunt Dracones,” Flight considers two of the most persistent monsters in the Anglo-Saxon world: the wolf and the dragon. Of the wolf, the author attests that the obvious nuisance of its preying upon the livestock of Anglo-Saxon farmers, combined with the viciousness of its attack, produced a supernatural fear of the animal. Despite the wolf’s acting within its own nature, the specimen was not only deemed a monster in the natural sense but one in opposition to that which is holy, with Flight saying that for this reason, “the wolf is both a monster and a diabolic creature” (73), one that dares defy the sanctity of God’s most innocent creations. While there is no evidence that dragons ever existed, Flight demonstrates in the next chapter that in the Anglo-Saxon world they were a very real fear and cited in numerous Old English texts. The author proposes that the perplexity of the dragon lends to its use as a device of otherness that encouraged a continued division between civilized and uncivilized lands, saying that “the dragon is able to fulfil [its] symbolic role because it is a monster of the pagan wilderness” (102). Ingrained into the mythology of the dragon is its greed, with many stories commenting on its lust for attaining and retaining gold in hidden underground lairs; Flight sees the Christian application in these stories as a means to thwart the sins of greed and lust with the threat of danger from a dragon being the deterrent warning, the dragon acting as a “monstrous symbol of avarice and warning to men about the consequences of committing the sin” (110). As the Anglo-Saxons rapidly converted to Christianity in the latter half of the first millennia, it comes as no surprise that another monster entered the psyche of that period: demons. In chapter 4, “Saints and Satanas,” Flight delves into how demons as monsters further demonstrate the division of the civilized and uncivilized worlds and how the dangers of the wilderness were interpreted as [End Page 228] malicious opposition from diabolical forces against the plight of the holy man. The author utilizes the examples of two famous Anglo-Saxon holy men who took flight to the wilds in search of contemplation and prayer but were met instead by demons; Guthlac of Crowland and Cuthbert of Lindisfarne. Guthlac, having chosen a home in the marshy fens of the woods, is accosted by demons in the wild; the afront isn’t physical, but...","PeriodicalId":53903,"journal":{"name":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World by Tim Flight (review)\",\"authors\":\"Scott Royle\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cjm.2023.a912689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World by Tim Flight Scott Royle Tim Flight, Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World (London: Reaktion, 2021), 262 pp., 20 ills. The first book by author Tim Flight, Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World, is a look into the various diabolic creatures that shared the land with the Anglo-Saxon peoples of medieval Britain. Flight presents a clear investigation of the origins, social utility, and Christian adoption of the various creatures that were said to plague the lands of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, including wolves, dragons, demons, and humanoids. The author takes special care to evidence how these monsters, and their homes, still influence our misunderstandings of the “other” and an ongoing weariness of the wild. After a very concise introduction, which includes pertinent historical remarks on Anglo-Saxon history, Flight’s first chapter, “The Map of Monsters,” geographically situates the coming chapters by providing an overview of the locations and habitations of monsters through both Graeco-Roman and Old English textual references, notably from The Wonders of the East, The Letters of Alexander to Aristotle, and the Liber monstrorum. It is in this section that the author demonstrates that a clear division between a civilized and uncivilized world existed in the cultures that influenced the Anglo-Saxons and that they readily adopted this division. As evidenced in their own writings, monsters were as much a part of the scenery for the Anglo-Saxons as any other natural wonder with “monsters [forming] part of the natural fauna of uncivilized places at the edge of the world” (61). In chapter 2, “Of Wolf and Man,” and chapter 3, “Hic Sunt Dracones,” Flight considers two of the most persistent monsters in the Anglo-Saxon world: the wolf and the dragon. Of the wolf, the author attests that the obvious nuisance of its preying upon the livestock of Anglo-Saxon farmers, combined with the viciousness of its attack, produced a supernatural fear of the animal. Despite the wolf’s acting within its own nature, the specimen was not only deemed a monster in the natural sense but one in opposition to that which is holy, with Flight saying that for this reason, “the wolf is both a monster and a diabolic creature” (73), one that dares defy the sanctity of God’s most innocent creations. While there is no evidence that dragons ever existed, Flight demonstrates in the next chapter that in the Anglo-Saxon world they were a very real fear and cited in numerous Old English texts. The author proposes that the perplexity of the dragon lends to its use as a device of otherness that encouraged a continued division between civilized and uncivilized lands, saying that “the dragon is able to fulfil [its] symbolic role because it is a monster of the pagan wilderness” (102). Ingrained into the mythology of the dragon is its greed, with many stories commenting on its lust for attaining and retaining gold in hidden underground lairs; Flight sees the Christian application in these stories as a means to thwart the sins of greed and lust with the threat of danger from a dragon being the deterrent warning, the dragon acting as a “monstrous symbol of avarice and warning to men about the consequences of committing the sin” (110). As the Anglo-Saxons rapidly converted to Christianity in the latter half of the first millennia, it comes as no surprise that another monster entered the psyche of that period: demons. In chapter 4, “Saints and Satanas,” Flight delves into how demons as monsters further demonstrate the division of the civilized and uncivilized worlds and how the dangers of the wilderness were interpreted as [End Page 228] malicious opposition from diabolical forces against the plight of the holy man. The author utilizes the examples of two famous Anglo-Saxon holy men who took flight to the wilds in search of contemplation and prayer but were met instead by demons; Guthlac of Crowland and Cuthbert of Lindisfarne. Guthlac, having chosen a home in the marshy fens of the woods, is accosted by demons in the wild; the afront isn’t physical, but...\",\"PeriodicalId\":53903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912689\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMITATUS-A JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cjm.2023.a912689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由:蛇怪和贝奥武夫:怪物在盎格鲁-撒克逊世界由蒂姆飞行斯科特罗伊蒂姆飞行,蛇怪和贝奥武夫:怪物在盎格鲁-撒克逊世界(伦敦:反应,2021年),262页,20病。作者Tim Flight的第一本书,《蛇怪和贝奥武夫:盎格鲁-撒克逊世界的怪物》,是对中世纪英国盎格鲁-撒克逊人共享土地的各种恶魔生物的研究。《飞行》一书清晰地探究了盎格鲁-撒克逊王国的起源、社会效用和基督教对各种生物的收养,这些生物据说是祸害盎格鲁-撒克逊王国的土地,包括狼、龙、恶魔和类人生物。作者特别用心地证明了这些怪物和它们的家园如何仍然影响着我们对“他者”的误解,以及对荒野的持续厌倦。在一个非常简洁的介绍之后,其中包括对盎格鲁-撒克逊历史的相关历史评论,Flight的第一章,“怪物地图”,通过希腊罗马和古英语的文本参考,特别是从东方的奇迹,亚历山大给亚里士多德的信件,和《怪物文集》中,提供了一个关于怪物位置和居住地的概述,从而在地理上定位了接下来的章节。正是在这一节中,作者证明了在影响盎格鲁-撒克逊人的文化中存在着文明和不文明世界之间的明确划分,并且他们欣然接受了这种划分。正如他们自己的著作所证明的那样,怪物和其他自然奇观一样,是盎格鲁-撒克逊人风景的一部分,“怪物[构成]世界边缘未开化地区自然动物群的一部分”(61)。在第二章“狼与人”和第三章“Hic Sunt Dracones”中,Flight考虑了盎格鲁-撒克逊世界中最顽固的两种怪物:狼和龙。关于狼,作者证明了它对盎格鲁-撒克逊农民的牲畜的捕食明显令人讨厌,加上它的攻击的恶毒,产生了对这种动物的超自然恐惧。尽管狼的行为符合自己的本性,但这种动物不仅被认为是自然意义上的怪物,而且被认为是与神圣对立的怪物,Flight说,正因为如此,“狼既是怪物又是恶魔”(73),它敢于挑战上帝最无辜的创造物的神圣性。虽然没有证据表明龙曾经存在过,但Flight在下一章中表明,在盎格鲁-撒克逊世界,龙是一种非常真实的恐惧,并在许多古英语文本中被引用。作者提出,龙的困惑使其成为一种他者性的工具,鼓励文明和不文明土地之间的持续分裂,他说“龙能够履行它的象征性角色,因为它是异教荒野的怪物”(102)。在龙的神话中根深蒂固的是它的贪婪,许多故事都评论了它在隐藏的地下巢穴中获得和保存黄金的欲望;Flight认为基督教在这些故事中的应用是阻止贪婪和欲望之罪的一种手段,龙的危险威胁是一种威慑警告,龙作为“贪婪的可怕象征,警告人们犯罪的后果”(110)。当盎格鲁-撒克逊人在第一个千年的后半叶迅速皈依基督教时,另一个怪物进入那个时期的心灵也就不足为奇了:恶魔。在第四章“圣徒和撒旦”中,Flight深入研究了恶魔作为怪物如何进一步证明文明和不文明世界的分裂,以及荒野的危险如何被解释为恶魔力量对圣人困境的恶意反对。作者引用了两个著名的盎格鲁-撒克逊圣人的例子,他们飞到野外寻找沉思和祈祷,但却遇到了恶魔;克兰的古斯拉克和林迪斯法恩的卡斯伯特。古斯拉克在森林沼泽的沼泽中选择了一个家,在野外被恶魔搭讪;正面不是身体上的,但是……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World by Tim Flight (review)
Reviewed by: Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World by Tim Flight Scott Royle Tim Flight, Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World (London: Reaktion, 2021), 262 pp., 20 ills. The first book by author Tim Flight, Basilisks and Beowulf: Monsters in the Anglo-Saxon World, is a look into the various diabolic creatures that shared the land with the Anglo-Saxon peoples of medieval Britain. Flight presents a clear investigation of the origins, social utility, and Christian adoption of the various creatures that were said to plague the lands of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, including wolves, dragons, demons, and humanoids. The author takes special care to evidence how these monsters, and their homes, still influence our misunderstandings of the “other” and an ongoing weariness of the wild. After a very concise introduction, which includes pertinent historical remarks on Anglo-Saxon history, Flight’s first chapter, “The Map of Monsters,” geographically situates the coming chapters by providing an overview of the locations and habitations of monsters through both Graeco-Roman and Old English textual references, notably from The Wonders of the East, The Letters of Alexander to Aristotle, and the Liber monstrorum. It is in this section that the author demonstrates that a clear division between a civilized and uncivilized world existed in the cultures that influenced the Anglo-Saxons and that they readily adopted this division. As evidenced in their own writings, monsters were as much a part of the scenery for the Anglo-Saxons as any other natural wonder with “monsters [forming] part of the natural fauna of uncivilized places at the edge of the world” (61). In chapter 2, “Of Wolf and Man,” and chapter 3, “Hic Sunt Dracones,” Flight considers two of the most persistent monsters in the Anglo-Saxon world: the wolf and the dragon. Of the wolf, the author attests that the obvious nuisance of its preying upon the livestock of Anglo-Saxon farmers, combined with the viciousness of its attack, produced a supernatural fear of the animal. Despite the wolf’s acting within its own nature, the specimen was not only deemed a monster in the natural sense but one in opposition to that which is holy, with Flight saying that for this reason, “the wolf is both a monster and a diabolic creature” (73), one that dares defy the sanctity of God’s most innocent creations. While there is no evidence that dragons ever existed, Flight demonstrates in the next chapter that in the Anglo-Saxon world they were a very real fear and cited in numerous Old English texts. The author proposes that the perplexity of the dragon lends to its use as a device of otherness that encouraged a continued division between civilized and uncivilized lands, saying that “the dragon is able to fulfil [its] symbolic role because it is a monster of the pagan wilderness” (102). Ingrained into the mythology of the dragon is its greed, with many stories commenting on its lust for attaining and retaining gold in hidden underground lairs; Flight sees the Christian application in these stories as a means to thwart the sins of greed and lust with the threat of danger from a dragon being the deterrent warning, the dragon acting as a “monstrous symbol of avarice and warning to men about the consequences of committing the sin” (110). As the Anglo-Saxons rapidly converted to Christianity in the latter half of the first millennia, it comes as no surprise that another monster entered the psyche of that period: demons. In chapter 4, “Saints and Satanas,” Flight delves into how demons as monsters further demonstrate the division of the civilized and uncivilized worlds and how the dangers of the wilderness were interpreted as [End Page 228] malicious opposition from diabolical forces against the plight of the holy man. The author utilizes the examples of two famous Anglo-Saxon holy men who took flight to the wilds in search of contemplation and prayer but were met instead by demons; Guthlac of Crowland and Cuthbert of Lindisfarne. Guthlac, having chosen a home in the marshy fens of the woods, is accosted by demons in the wild; the afront isn’t physical, but...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies publishes articles by graduate students and recent PhDs in any field of medieval and Renaissance studies. The journal maintains a tradition of gathering work from across disciplines, with a special interest in articles that have an interdisciplinary or cross-cultural scope.
期刊最新文献
Women’s Lives: Self-Representation, Reception and Appropriation in the Middle Ages ed. by Daniel Armenti and Nahir I. Otaño Gracia (review) The Complete History of the Black Death by Ole J. Benedictow (review) Art and Curiosity Cabinets of the Late Renaissance: A Contribution to the History of Collecting by Julius von Schlosser, and: Kunstkammer: Early Modern Art and Curiosity Cabinets in the Holy Roman Empire by Jeffrey Chipps Smith (review) Bishop Æthelwold, His Followers, and Saints’ Cults in Early Medieval England: Power, Belief, and Religious Reform by Alison Hudson (review) Writing Old Age and Impairment in Late Medieval England by Will Rogers (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1