感染性休克患者静脉注射扑热息痛引起的低血压:一项单中心安慰剂对照随机研究

Ayah Khalil, Ahmed Mukhtar, Ahmed Lotfy, Karima Abu EL-Fotuh, Zeinab Zalat
{"title":"感染性休克患者静脉注射扑热息痛引起的低血压:一项单中心安慰剂对照随机研究","authors":"Ayah Khalil, Ahmed Mukhtar, Ahmed Lotfy, Karima Abu EL-Fotuh, Zeinab Zalat","doi":"10.21608/aijpms.2023.221239.1223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": According to the product information for parenteral paracetamol, fewer than 1% of patients will have more severe adverse effects like hypotension. However, a number of studies suggest that the prevalence of hypotension caused by parenteral paracetamol may be higher than actually thought by the drug's producers. We carried out prospective, controlled, randomized research to compare the clinical implications of intravenous paracetamol bolus versus intravenous paracetamol extended infusion. The 61 adult septic shock patients were divided into three groups by randomization: Bolus group who received paracetamol 1g/100ml infused over 15 minutes, while the extended infusion group who received paracetamol 1g/100ml infused over three hours. The control group who received normal saline 100ml infused over 15 minutes. The main outcome was the incidence and prevalence of reduced blood pressure, which was detected by a systolic blood pressure drop of ≥ 20 ٪ from baseline. Mean arterial pressure, vasopressor infusion flow rate, and both diastolic and systolic blood pressure did not change significantly according to statistical analysis between the three groups at baseline, one, three, or six hours after the intervention. The incidence of hypotension was 19% (4 of 21 patients) within the control or normal saline group, 50% (10 of 20 patients) within the bolus group, and 35% (7 of 20) within the extended infusion group. The prevalence of hypotensive episodes was greater in the bolus group, even though there was no clinically meaningful difference between intravenous paracetamol prolonged infusion and bolus. We do not need to administer paracetamol as a prolonged infusion to prevent the hemodynamics parameter from being negatively impacted.","PeriodicalId":481938,"journal":{"name":"Azhar International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Sciences (Print)","volume":"136 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The hypotension caused by intravenous paracetamol in septic shock patients: A single center placebo controlled randomized study\",\"authors\":\"Ayah Khalil, Ahmed Mukhtar, Ahmed Lotfy, Karima Abu EL-Fotuh, Zeinab Zalat\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/aijpms.2023.221239.1223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": According to the product information for parenteral paracetamol, fewer than 1% of patients will have more severe adverse effects like hypotension. However, a number of studies suggest that the prevalence of hypotension caused by parenteral paracetamol may be higher than actually thought by the drug's producers. We carried out prospective, controlled, randomized research to compare the clinical implications of intravenous paracetamol bolus versus intravenous paracetamol extended infusion. The 61 adult septic shock patients were divided into three groups by randomization: Bolus group who received paracetamol 1g/100ml infused over 15 minutes, while the extended infusion group who received paracetamol 1g/100ml infused over three hours. The control group who received normal saline 100ml infused over 15 minutes. The main outcome was the incidence and prevalence of reduced blood pressure, which was detected by a systolic blood pressure drop of ≥ 20 ٪ from baseline. Mean arterial pressure, vasopressor infusion flow rate, and both diastolic and systolic blood pressure did not change significantly according to statistical analysis between the three groups at baseline, one, three, or six hours after the intervention. The incidence of hypotension was 19% (4 of 21 patients) within the control or normal saline group, 50% (10 of 20 patients) within the bolus group, and 35% (7 of 20) within the extended infusion group. The prevalence of hypotensive episodes was greater in the bolus group, even though there was no clinically meaningful difference between intravenous paracetamol prolonged infusion and bolus. We do not need to administer paracetamol as a prolonged infusion to prevent the hemodynamics parameter from being negatively impacted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":481938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Azhar International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Sciences (Print)\",\"volume\":\"136 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Azhar International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Sciences (Print)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/aijpms.2023.221239.1223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Azhar International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Sciences (Print)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aijpms.2023.221239.1223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The hypotension caused by intravenous paracetamol in septic shock patients: A single center placebo controlled randomized study
: According to the product information for parenteral paracetamol, fewer than 1% of patients will have more severe adverse effects like hypotension. However, a number of studies suggest that the prevalence of hypotension caused by parenteral paracetamol may be higher than actually thought by the drug's producers. We carried out prospective, controlled, randomized research to compare the clinical implications of intravenous paracetamol bolus versus intravenous paracetamol extended infusion. The 61 adult septic shock patients were divided into three groups by randomization: Bolus group who received paracetamol 1g/100ml infused over 15 minutes, while the extended infusion group who received paracetamol 1g/100ml infused over three hours. The control group who received normal saline 100ml infused over 15 minutes. The main outcome was the incidence and prevalence of reduced blood pressure, which was detected by a systolic blood pressure drop of ≥ 20 ٪ from baseline. Mean arterial pressure, vasopressor infusion flow rate, and both diastolic and systolic blood pressure did not change significantly according to statistical analysis between the three groups at baseline, one, three, or six hours after the intervention. The incidence of hypotension was 19% (4 of 21 patients) within the control or normal saline group, 50% (10 of 20 patients) within the bolus group, and 35% (7 of 20) within the extended infusion group. The prevalence of hypotensive episodes was greater in the bolus group, even though there was no clinically meaningful difference between intravenous paracetamol prolonged infusion and bolus. We do not need to administer paracetamol as a prolonged infusion to prevent the hemodynamics parameter from being negatively impacted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The hypotension caused by intravenous paracetamol in septic shock patients: A single center placebo controlled randomized study Development of pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine derivatives: Synthesis, anticancer activity and docking study Brain Targeted Delivery of Levetiracetam Loaded Nanosphere
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1