游乐场环境的通用设计:基于场所的设施、使用和体育活动的评估

IF 1.3 0 ARCHITECTURE Landscape Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.3368/lj.42.2.55
Kenneth Hurst, Chanam Lee, Forster Ndubisi
{"title":"游乐场环境的通用设计:基于场所的设施、使用和体育活动的评估","authors":"Kenneth Hurst, Chanam Lee, Forster Ndubisi","doi":"10.3368/lj.42.2.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> This study compares three playground environments for the impact of Universal Design on playground use and the physical activity levels of users. While Universal Design principles are increasingly used in playground design, most prior work has focused on their roles for people with disabilities. This study explores Universal Design impacts on all users regardless of their age or disability status, applying a case‐comparison methodology with one case playground (built with Universal Design principles) and two comparison playgrounds (built without Universal Design principles) that are comparable in other conditions. Using a modified System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities tool that enables location‐specific recordings of momentary environmental observation data, this study compares use and physical activity in playground environments. User location and characteristics were recorded on a plan map of the park and the playground. The data were collected from 70 randomized observation periods per park (210 total for the three parks) recording 12,520 total users. Results showed that while the total user counts were similar across the three parks, the Universal Design playground showed 82% more users than in the mean of the comparison playgrounds. The study also applied methodologies serving to evaluate the place‐based effects of park elements on the intensity of park use and physical activity. The playground areas produced 46% of park use, with the highest percentages of active use (29.2%) in the parks as a whole demonstrating the contribution playground environments make to overall park use and physical activity.","PeriodicalId":54062,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Journal","volume":"53 3-4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Universal Design in Playground Environments: A Place‐Based Evaluation of Amenities, Use, and Physical Activity\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Hurst, Chanam Lee, Forster Ndubisi\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/lj.42.2.55\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> This study compares three playground environments for the impact of Universal Design on playground use and the physical activity levels of users. While Universal Design principles are increasingly used in playground design, most prior work has focused on their roles for people with disabilities. This study explores Universal Design impacts on all users regardless of their age or disability status, applying a case‐comparison methodology with one case playground (built with Universal Design principles) and two comparison playgrounds (built without Universal Design principles) that are comparable in other conditions. Using a modified System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities tool that enables location‐specific recordings of momentary environmental observation data, this study compares use and physical activity in playground environments. User location and characteristics were recorded on a plan map of the park and the playground. The data were collected from 70 randomized observation periods per park (210 total for the three parks) recording 12,520 total users. Results showed that while the total user counts were similar across the three parks, the Universal Design playground showed 82% more users than in the mean of the comparison playgrounds. The study also applied methodologies serving to evaluate the place‐based effects of park elements on the intensity of park use and physical activity. The playground areas produced 46% of park use, with the highest percentages of active use (29.2%) in the parks as a whole demonstrating the contribution playground environments make to overall park use and physical activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape Journal\",\"volume\":\"53 3-4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.42.2.55\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.42.2.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究比较了三种操场环境对通用设计对操场使用和用户身体活动水平的影响。虽然通用设计原则越来越多地应用于游乐场设计,但大多数先前的工作都集中在残疾人的角色上。本研究探讨了通用设计对所有用户的影响,而不考虑他们的年龄或残疾状况,采用案例比较方法,其中一个案例游乐场(按照通用设计原则建造)和两个比较游乐场(没有按照通用设计原则建造)在其他条件下具有可比性。本研究使用一个改进的社区游戏和娱乐观察系统工具,该工具能够记录特定位置的瞬间环境观察数据,比较了游乐场环境中的使用和身体活动。用户的位置和特征被记录在公园和操场的平面图上。数据收集自每个公园70个随机观察期(三个公园共210个观察期),记录了12,520名用户。结果显示,虽然三个公园的总用户数相似,但通用设计游乐场的用户数比比较游乐场的平均值多82%。该研究还应用了用于评估公园要素对公园使用强度和身体活动强度的基于地点的影响的方法。游乐场区域产生了46%的公园使用,在整个公园中活跃使用的比例最高(29.2%),这表明游乐场环境对整体公园使用和身体活动的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Universal Design in Playground Environments: A Place‐Based Evaluation of Amenities, Use, and Physical Activity

Abstract

This study compares three playground environments for the impact of Universal Design on playground use and the physical activity levels of users. While Universal Design principles are increasingly used in playground design, most prior work has focused on their roles for people with disabilities. This study explores Universal Design impacts on all users regardless of their age or disability status, applying a case‐comparison methodology with one case playground (built with Universal Design principles) and two comparison playgrounds (built without Universal Design principles) that are comparable in other conditions. Using a modified System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities tool that enables location‐specific recordings of momentary environmental observation data, this study compares use and physical activity in playground environments. User location and characteristics were recorded on a plan map of the park and the playground. The data were collected from 70 randomized observation periods per park (210 total for the three parks) recording 12,520 total users. Results showed that while the total user counts were similar across the three parks, the Universal Design playground showed 82% more users than in the mean of the comparison playgrounds. The study also applied methodologies serving to evaluate the place‐based effects of park elements on the intensity of park use and physical activity. The playground areas produced 46% of park use, with the highest percentages of active use (29.2%) in the parks as a whole demonstrating the contribution playground environments make to overall park use and physical activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape Journal
Landscape Journal ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The mission of landscape architecture is supported by research and theory in many fields. Landscape Journal offers in-depth exploration of ideas and challenges that are central to contemporary design, planning, and teaching. Besides scholarly features, Landscape Journal also includes editorial columns, creative work, reviews of books, conferences, technology, and exhibitions. Landscape Journal digs deeper into the field by providing articles from: • landscape architects • geographers • architects • planners • artists • historians • ecologists • poets
期刊最新文献
Binocular Horizontal Diplopia Following mRNA-1273 Vaccine. Assessment of Nasal Obstruction in Patients Undergoing Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Statements on Landscape Architecture Programs Worldwide: Case Studies across the Globe American Urbanist: How William H. Whyte’s Unconventional Wisdom Reshaped Public Life Research in Landscape Architecture Design Firms: Lessons from Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1