{"title":"数据驱动尾流模型参数估计,分析尾流叠加效应","authors":"M. J. LoCascio, C. Gorlé, M. F. Howland","doi":"10.1063/5.0163896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low-fidelity wake models are used for wind farm design and control optimization. To generalize to a wind farm model, individually modeled wakes are commonly superimposed using approximate superposition models. Wake models parameterize atmospheric and wake turbulence, introducing unknown model parameters that historically are tuned with idealized simulation or experimental data and neglect uncertainty. We calibrate and estimate the uncertainty of the parameters in a Gaussian wake model using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for various wake superposition methods. Posterior distributions of the uncertain parameters are generated using power production data from large eddy simulations and a utility-scale wake steering field experiment. The posteriors for the wake expansion coefficient are sensitive to the choice of superposition method, with relative differences in the means and standard deviations on the order of 100%. This sensitivity illustrates the role of superposition methods in wake modeling error. We compare these data-driven parameter estimates to estimates derived from a standard turbulence-intensity based model as a baseline. To assess predictive accuracy, we calibrate the data-driven parameter estimates with a training dataset for yaw-aligned operation. Using a Monte Carlo approach, we then generate predicted distributions of turbine power production and evaluate against a hold-out test dataset for yaw-misaligned operation. For the cases tested, the MCMC-calibrated parameters reduce the total error of the power predictions by roughly 50% compared to the deterministic empirical model predictions. An additional benefit of the data-driven parameter estimation is the quantification of uncertainty, which enables physically quantified confidence intervals of wake model predictions.","PeriodicalId":16953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data-driven wake model parameter estimation to analyze effects of wake superposition\",\"authors\":\"M. J. LoCascio, C. Gorlé, M. F. Howland\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0163896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Low-fidelity wake models are used for wind farm design and control optimization. To generalize to a wind farm model, individually modeled wakes are commonly superimposed using approximate superposition models. Wake models parameterize atmospheric and wake turbulence, introducing unknown model parameters that historically are tuned with idealized simulation or experimental data and neglect uncertainty. We calibrate and estimate the uncertainty of the parameters in a Gaussian wake model using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for various wake superposition methods. Posterior distributions of the uncertain parameters are generated using power production data from large eddy simulations and a utility-scale wake steering field experiment. The posteriors for the wake expansion coefficient are sensitive to the choice of superposition method, with relative differences in the means and standard deviations on the order of 100%. This sensitivity illustrates the role of superposition methods in wake modeling error. We compare these data-driven parameter estimates to estimates derived from a standard turbulence-intensity based model as a baseline. To assess predictive accuracy, we calibrate the data-driven parameter estimates with a training dataset for yaw-aligned operation. Using a Monte Carlo approach, we then generate predicted distributions of turbine power production and evaluate against a hold-out test dataset for yaw-misaligned operation. For the cases tested, the MCMC-calibrated parameters reduce the total error of the power predictions by roughly 50% compared to the deterministic empirical model predictions. An additional benefit of the data-driven parameter estimation is the quantification of uncertainty, which enables physically quantified confidence intervals of wake model predictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0163896\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0163896","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Data-driven wake model parameter estimation to analyze effects of wake superposition
Low-fidelity wake models are used for wind farm design and control optimization. To generalize to a wind farm model, individually modeled wakes are commonly superimposed using approximate superposition models. Wake models parameterize atmospheric and wake turbulence, introducing unknown model parameters that historically are tuned with idealized simulation or experimental data and neglect uncertainty. We calibrate and estimate the uncertainty of the parameters in a Gaussian wake model using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for various wake superposition methods. Posterior distributions of the uncertain parameters are generated using power production data from large eddy simulations and a utility-scale wake steering field experiment. The posteriors for the wake expansion coefficient are sensitive to the choice of superposition method, with relative differences in the means and standard deviations on the order of 100%. This sensitivity illustrates the role of superposition methods in wake modeling error. We compare these data-driven parameter estimates to estimates derived from a standard turbulence-intensity based model as a baseline. To assess predictive accuracy, we calibrate the data-driven parameter estimates with a training dataset for yaw-aligned operation. Using a Monte Carlo approach, we then generate predicted distributions of turbine power production and evaluate against a hold-out test dataset for yaw-misaligned operation. For the cases tested, the MCMC-calibrated parameters reduce the total error of the power predictions by roughly 50% compared to the deterministic empirical model predictions. An additional benefit of the data-driven parameter estimation is the quantification of uncertainty, which enables physically quantified confidence intervals of wake model predictions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy (JRSE) is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal covering all areas of renewable and sustainable energy relevant to the physical science and engineering communities. The interdisciplinary approach of the publication ensures that the editors draw from researchers worldwide in a diverse range of fields.
Topics covered include:
Renewable energy economics and policy
Renewable energy resource assessment
Solar energy: photovoltaics, solar thermal energy, solar energy for fuels
Wind energy: wind farms, rotors and blades, on- and offshore wind conditions, aerodynamics, fluid dynamics
Bioenergy: biofuels, biomass conversion, artificial photosynthesis
Distributed energy generation: rooftop PV, distributed fuel cells, distributed wind, micro-hydrogen power generation
Power distribution & systems modeling: power electronics and controls, smart grid
Energy efficient buildings: smart windows, PV, wind, power management
Energy conversion: flexoelectric, piezoelectric, thermoelectric, other technologies
Energy storage: batteries, supercapacitors, hydrogen storage, other fuels
Fuel cells: proton exchange membrane cells, solid oxide cells, hybrid fuel cells, other
Marine and hydroelectric energy: dams, tides, waves, other
Transportation: alternative vehicle technologies, plug-in technologies, other
Geothermal energy